INVESTIGATION FOLLOWUP
Procedure
My science experiment was to test toilet paper, to find a good toilet paper brand to use. The goal was to find the toilet paper that broke apart the fastest in moving water, the toilet paper that held the most pennies when wet, and the toilet paper that held the most pennies when dry. For the deconstruction test, what toilet paper would break apart the fastest in moving water, I tested the toilet paper by placing a mixer in water and dropping a 2 by 2 inch piece of toilet paper in the spinning water. I repeated this twenty times for each brand of toilet paper. I hypothesized that Scott would break apart the fastest because it was the thinnest toilet paper and one-ply. For the wet test, how many pennies toilet paper could hold when wet, I put a piece of toilet paper on a plastic cup and
…show more content…
Then I dropped 5 drops of water onto the toilet paper and then added pennies until the paper broke. I repeated this 10 times for each brand. My hypothesis for this test was that Quilted Northern would hold the most pennies because it was one of the thickest toilet papers. For the dry test, what toilet paper would hold the most pennies when dry, I repeated what I did for the wet testing but did not put water onto the toilet paper. Instead, I placed a laundry cup taped to a Jenga block in the middle of the piece of toilet paper. I then proceeded to placed 100 pennies in the cup waited 20 seconds, placed a paper towel in the cup then added pennies until the toilet paper broke. I did this ten times for each brand. I hypothesized for the dry test that Member’s Mark would hold the most pennies because it was
Next, we determined the mass of the penny by placing it on a balance. The mass of the penny was 2.47 grams. Afterwards, we placed the penny in a beaker filled with 20 mL of 6 M HCl. In the end we put the beaker in the fume hood and allowed it to sit overnight. During day two of the penny lab, we removed the penny skin from the beaker using tweezers.
The Department of Defense recognized the uselessness of the penny so they abolished the use of pennies at overseas military bases more than 30 years ago. Now, instead of using the penny these bases use the round up and round down method. The reason these bases abolished the penny is because the penny is “too heavy and not cost-effective to ship.” (4) This is also true in the United States as well. The penny has become completely obsolete and is no longer cost-effective to ship across the country.
Everyone come back to the rug to talk about what you found.” 9. Ask each of the groups what they found, how many of each they found, and have them explain what shape they are like and why. 10. Wait for all groups for their findings.
The complete waste of time and money spent producing these pennies just to be forgotten in the couch cushions is astounding. If every penny is 1.8 cents to produce than the government is giving away 800 million USD every single year. The same article says, “...10 million new useless items punched out by government workers who could be more usefully employed tracking counterfeiters.” In other words, the government isn’t only wasting money on penny production but, also a working staff. U.S. currency could be more protected if it wasn’t for the pesky penny.
Another variable is how durable the clothespin is. If the clothespin is deformed before or during the experiment, it can affect how many times the clothespin is squeezed because it is not working correctly. Lastly, one more variable is the motivation and wanting to participate to squeeze the clothespin as many times as possible. If the person has more motivation, it is most likely the person will squeeze the clothespin more
Stated in Source 4 “The penny should stay” by Grace Harter. If the penny was so popular like source 4 states, why does it state otherwise in source 3 “Abolish the Penny” by William Safire, “Two-thirds of them immediately drop out of circulation, into piggy banks or—as The Times’s John Tierney noted five years ago—behind chair cushions or at the back of sock drawers next to your old tin-foil ball. Quarters and dimes circulated; pennies disappear because they are literally more trouble than they are worth.” summarizing that all up, the majority of the time people just toss pennies to the side, they are useless and should be abolished.
The purpose of this lab was to change pennies from copper to silver to gold, like alchemists have attempted to do in history. Through the data and observations gathered throughout this experiment, it can be concluded that the pennies were not changed into a different element. For example, the density of the penny from 2005; which was the penny that was experimented on to see whether or not it could turn into silver; was 4.62 g/cm3 before the experiment and 4.89 g/cm3 by the end of the experiment. If this copper penny really would have turned into silver, then the density of the penny would be 10.49 g/cm3; which is the density of silver; by the end of the experiment. The penny may have turned silver in color, but this was only because it was plated in the zinc that was added to the beaker of water in the experiment.
Off with the Head The penny is one of America 's most iconic coins, but yet people toss them once in their possession. Most thoughts about the penny are more negative than positive. Lewis, Mark’s passage (Source A) shows the reason is has not been banned yet. Kahn, Ric’s passage (Source B) explains the penny was only good in its prime, and now is wasting our time.
Pennies are rarely made of copper anymore, but instead, mainly zinc. In his “Ban the Penny” article, Mark Lewis recognizes the penny argument and states “But the penny has its fans, especially in Tennessee, which is rich in zinc.” (Source A). Tennessee makes
Pennies, for a majority of people, are just little worthless pieces of mass that are left basins collecting dust, being thrown into water fountains for luck, and at times are refused at supermarkets because of how little they are worth. Along with what the average American does with their pennies, the smallest United States currency is costing us more than seven million dollars a year, in the retail business alone. The Department of Defence doesn’t think that pennies are even worth it. As stated by Chris Ward in paragraph one of Source #2, “Pennies are too heavy and are not cost-effective to ship.” As well as, according to Source #2, “The U.S. Congress is considering eliminating the penny from the United States currency system.”
That just shows how I'm right about getting rid of the coin. I know taxpayers don't don't want to keep wasting their money on the penny. Pennies serve in today's
This shows that the penny is a part of U.S history and will cause many problems if they stop making them. Additionally in source 4, it is stated “This system would be extremely confusing
On our paper we predicted the amount of pennies that could fit in the boat before it sank. We tested the boat in the water and added pennies one by one. We then calculated the mass of pennies that fit in the boat and the density of it. The purpose of this Lab was to make a boat that holds as many pennies as possible and understand how to calculate
Soap’s Effect on The Surface Tension Of Water By: Lusinda Garcia Biology I - Pre-AP December 10, 2017 Introduction Surface tension is when the surface of a liquid that’s in contact with gas, acts like a thin elastic sheet. Water has a high level of surface tension, which means that when the molecules on the surface of water are not surrounded by similar molecules on all sides, they're being pulled by cohesion from other similar molecules deep inside. These molecules bind to each other strongly but stick to the other mediums weakly. It has been proven many times that soap decreases water’s surface tension; however, there is still a vast amount of people that believe soap increases the elasticity of water’s surface tension. Soap’s negative
An organ bath experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of agonist, histamine on guinea pig ileum (GPI) and how the antagonists, mepyramine and SIPBSDrug A affect the GPI’s response (smooth muscle contractions). A GPI simulation was conducted to compare the potencies and nature of antagonists against histamine. The control Rmax and EC50 of histamine without antagonist were 16.49gms and 2.093 x 10-7M respectively. The concentration-response curves were shifted to right parallelly and EC50 increased while Rmax remained constant when mepyramine or SIPBSDrug A was added. Besides, both antagonists showed linear graphs in Schild plot, indicating that they acted as reversible competitive antagonists.