We could’ve decided what our laws were instead of going to war over them and we could’ve taken over what states we wanted instead of fighting the North for them. The Civil War did not help our economy it only made it worse and brought our country down. If we were allowed to secede we could’ve picked our own laws. Another issue was the President, we could have appointed our own if we were our own
Madison believes that large republics are best able to avoid the dangers of faction. This is because at large republics, there are more experiences to share and unity is better valued. Also because the majority rules in republics, but the minorities ideas are still taken into consideration. In Federalist Paper 51, James Madison is explaining that the purpose of the essay is so that people have a better understanding on how the structure of the proposed government makes liberty possible. He is trying to justify that no one branch of government should have too much power in selecting confederates of the other branches and that the citizens should select their president.
The 17th Amendment changed that by allowing Senators to be elected by popular vote from the state that they are representing. One of the most important power is given to the judicial branch; this is the power of judicial review, where a judge can rule over any law that seems to be unconstitutional, even if it is signed by Congress and the President. Dahl feels that the judiciary branch has repeatedly used its power over authority to change the Constitution. Therefore, the judicial branch can be also interpreted as an independent branch due to their strong use of passing limitations by the government. Federal and State Power became a very controversial debate which was limited more than the other.
If the Anti-Federalists had not taken a stand, several important elements may have been left out of the Constitution such as the checks and balances that kept each of the divisions of government from obtaining too much control of the government. In addition, limiting terms of certain political offices kept a rotation of not only ideas, but a variety of leaders and representatives for the various states. Finally, without the intervention of the Anti-Federalists, the “Bill of Rights” may not have been added to the governing policies and the protection of individual rights may not have been put into place. The combination of Federalists and Anti-Federalists allowed the creation of a strong national government with a “personal” representation of the individuals it was created
The Anti-Federalists that opposed the constitution believed that the constitution would give too much power to the government. The Anti-Federalists argued that a powerful government would become tyrannical like the British monarchy that they worked so hard to escape from. This led them to create The Bill of Rights. Today’s government has similar problems. Nowadays some politicians believe that The Bill of Rights is a living document that can be changed or manipulated to “better fit” the era that we live in.
The electoral college is a process the founding fathers established in the constitution with the intent to create a safeguard between the population and the selection of a president, and to give extra power to smaller states. However, based on the information presented in the articles the electoral college should be abolished as it violates our right of political equality, and fails to represent a third, independent, party in any election. Although there are many reasons to abolish the electoral college, the principal reason to take action would be the result of an obvious violation of our right to be politically equal. As shown in the chart provided (Doc D) 12 of the lowest populated states and the District of Columbia have almost the
Is this the right way to vote for the president of the United States. Overall, should the Electoral College stay in place or should it be replaced? The Electoral College has many cons that must be heard before a decision can be made. A huge downside to the Electoral College is that it misperceives the general population into thinking that they
A common wish among Americans is if they were President they would change so much and do what is best for everyone. Now common sense suggest that this would most likely not happen. Because of the separation of powers created by the constitution the branches of government have the ability to keep each other in check. So this essay is going to be taken from the point of view that separation of powers gives the President a little more ability to pass what laws he wants without having to deal with the congress, senate, and the Supreme Court. With this in mind a controversial topic of today in our country is social services such as the welfare system and food stamps.
We also have a right to say what we think the government should do for our nation. People like to use the first amendment to their advantage. They make fun of people and say it was their opinion or their “constitutional right”. People should not use the first amendment as an excuse for being rude to another human. When people are about to make fun of religions or looks they should stop, and think about how they would feel if a person said the same to them.
We all have different opinions. Some people feel like their vote doesn’t matter, others show up to the polls to demonstrate their ideals, their are those who believe that one person can’t control the outcomes of ordinary life, and some may think new leaders bring new opportunities or challenges for an average person. In all reality anything can cause a change rather you vote or not , not voting can cause things that is unwanted to happen. The best solution is to =show up to the polls in every election to demonstrate their ideals. Demonstrating their ideals obviously means expressing their feelings and thoughts on who should be in charge of our country or community.
The Federalist system of our government requires there be a sharing of power between branches, which is very much enforced with the Electoral College. There are speculations that with the abolishment of the Electoral College, the Federalist system would be lost with it. The Electoral college also helps to promote the two party system, and while some people may take issue with this, it is a way of creating stability in our government. With the distribution of power the Electoral College promotes, this allows the minority to be represented. However, there is a big issue in that the majority vote is not properly reflected by the Electoral College.
(2 points) The constitution is still important today because without it, what would become of our government? It’s relevant because people still believe we have to obey by it. People believe in their rights as an American and without the Constitution, American’s rights would not be protected and the government wouldn’t be able to function. Although there is quite the debate on the constitution. Some believe that it is outdated and that we shouldn’t have to follow it and others believe that it is apart of our history and how the Founding Father’s wanted the United States to be.
It, for the most part, takes away the ability to vote the president. The Electoral College was made in a period when votes were harder to gather and number. With everything done electronically today, a straightforward mainstream vote would suffice. I don 't trust the Electoral College was ever implied as an approach to maintain a strategic distance from the mainstream vote comes about. It is just an obsolete framework that ought to be discarded.
This may be more inclined to act in such a way at home in the United States. Having this kind of behavior in the current government could be a sign of a flawed government. The reason why the America is such a great nation is because they have a president every citizen over 18 can vote on who they think is the most reasonable candidate. But if the U.S starts adding all this land a president might start evolving into a Tyrant. Obviously this would set off a huge alarm because the reason the U.S was born was to gain freedom from a Tyrant.