Articles of Confederation and The Constitution, both have some similarities, but they differ more than they do resemble one another. The most common aspect of each other, is that, they were established
One of the biggest part of the constitutions is the government and how it’s made up. Both the U.S. and Michigan Constitutions require a three branch government with the rule of check and balance, and both also have bicameral legislatures. However, in the Michigan Constitution the legislative power is vested in the senate and house of representative, while in the U.S. Constitution it is vested in the Congress. Also, the jurisdiction of courts are different in both.
In this essay I have went over the similarities and differences between the Iroquois and the American constitution. Throughout this essay I’ve went over simple and elaborate differences, some subtle some intriguingly different. As you read over an essay about our grounded constitution; and the background over how the Iroquois gave us our guidelines for the constitution, you will be amazed at the similarities throughout it. In history it can be amazing to see how it honestly does repeat itself. So the next time you wonder about the future, think about your past and you may be
The Oklahoma Constitution and the United States Constitution have a variety of similarities and differences, thus creating an array of topics of discussion. The very structure of the state 's constitution holds close similarities to the U.S. Constitution, given the fact that it was ratified over a century later. At the time of the making of the Oklahoma Constitution, there were arguments between the left and right areas of the state. These arguments were based on the fact that the people involved in the making of the state 's constitution wanted to have the area that was labeled "Indian territory" and make it a secure part of the state of Oklahoma. After doing so, the two areas merged and created the document that the state still uses to this day.
The United States Constitution is a document that or founding fathers made in order to replace the failing Articles of Confederation (A of C). Under the Constitution, the current government and states don’t have the problems they faced when the A of C was in action. The Constitution was created in 1788, and held an idea that the whole nation was nervous about. This idea was a strong national government, and the Federalist assured the people that this new government would work. The framers of the Constitution decided to give more power to the Federal government rather than the state governments because the A of C had many problems, there was a need for the layout of new government, rights, and laws, and there was a need for the Federal
There are many Constitutions in the U.S., all the state constitutions and the U.S. Constitution. I will be writing about both the Maryland and U.S. Constitution, which have many differences and similarities. This essay is about the three similarities and differences of the Maryland and U.S. Constitution that I found. The three differences and similarities are the state constitution is reserved for state government, whereas the U.S. Constitution is reserved for the national government, “They both embody the principles of representative democratic government”, and they are different in length and structure.
The Iroquois League was a constitution, while the European Union was a confederation. Five nations that are on the special flag of the Iroquois League formed the Iroquois League, while six countries started the European Union, later ending with 30 countries. Those six countries are Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, and West Germany, while the five nations were Seneca, Mohawk, Oneida, Cayuga, and Onondaga. The Iroquois League was one of the earliest to practice democratic exercises. The European Union didn’t accept this, but the Iroquois League didn’t care about that and still exercised democracy. The Iroquois League held power until the 18th century while on the other hand the European Union still holds power until this very day. And this answers your question “What are the differences between the European Union and the Iroquois League?”
The Articles of Confederation was an agreement among the thirteen original states of the United States that served as the first constitution. The Articles had first been introduced by Richard Henry Lee in the Second Continental Congress. Although the Articles of Confederation has made its contributions throughout history, the Articles, however, did not last very long and had been proven inadequate from the very start. I agree with this statement based on the examples and analysis of the Constitution I will soon provide. The Articles of Confederation were written during a time when the American people feared a strong national government. Since the United States was relatively a new nation, it needed some form of organization to hold the states together and keep its government and society stable to build a stronger economy (Knoedl, 2003).
Some of the main things the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution have in common is that they addressed the needs of its constituencies. Both of these Documents were created with the mind set to provide the foundation for a unified, centralized government. Even though the confederation only lasted from 1781-1789, it was still seen to be valuable with its belief that sovereignty belongs to every state. After the Confederation ended in 1789, the U.S. Constitution took place bringing the states together as a whole. While these two documents have the needs of the nation in mind, they both do have quite a bit of a difference as well.
Following the Revolutionary War, America had just gained independance from Great Britain and needed to form a new government. The Articles of Confederation were established as an attempt to create a government that was unlike Britain’s. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. When in the process of repairing those weaknesses, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists formed. The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.
Some similarities that the two documents share is the fact that both documents granted Congress the power to declare war and make treaties. In addition, the documents allowed the government to coin and borrow money. Laws could also be made under the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution. So in conclusion, even though both documents had some similarities and differences, both helped to shape our current government in different
The haudenosaunee or people of the longhouse known as the Six nations or the Iroquois, they are members of the confederacy of Aboriginal nations known as the Haudenosaunee Confederacy. When the tuscarora joined the confederacy early in the 18th century, it mostly known as the Six nations.
Even though these documents were created only 6 years difference, they really had their differences. The founding fathers took the lessons learnt from the problematic Articles of confederation and bettered themselves, which resulted in the Constitution we still have
In 1742 the chief of Onondaga of the Iroquois Confederacy knew that his land that the people shared would become more valuable than it has ever been. (Doc B)The reason for this was because the “white people” also known as the Americans wanted the land of the chief. The feelings of the Chief result in complaining to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,
The Constitution is better than the Articles of Confederation because the Articles of Confederation had many weaknesses. The Articles did not give Congress the power to place tariffs on foreign goods, hurting American businesses that could not compete with cheaper British goods. The U.S. government had no chief executive so there was no one to enforce the laws that were passed. The new Constitution addressed many of the problems created by the Articles by creating a federal system of government with a much more powerful national government. The Constitution made a stronger Federal government that could unite the States, taking many of the powers held by the States: the right to tax, the right to raise armies, the right to regulate trade and