Was Oj Simpson Guilty

861 Words4 Pages

In 1995, former NFL player O.J. Simpson was put on trial for the murder of his wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. O.J. Simpson’s trial is believed to be one of the most popular and controversial trials to ever take place in the Los Angeles Superior Court. O.J. was found not guilty by the verdict and was released to go on and live his life. But my belief is, O.J. should have been found guilty, because of all the of the evidence that was found at the scene and later on in the investigation they discovered more evidence. Also because of the book that Nicole’s brothers published later after her death. Nicole Brown was murdered on June 12, 1994, she was only thirty five-years old, she was found in a pool of her own blood. Also on the same day they discovered another body. It belonged to Ronald Goldman, a close friend of NIcole Brown’s. Nicole was found on the steps outside of her own house, 875 South Bundy Drive. …show more content…

Simpson should be found guilty. The police found two keys in O.J.’s possession that were for Nicole’s condo. Days before her murder she called the police and reported about the missing keys “I noticed that one set of keys to my condo went missing as I went to grab a set to head out of town.” The only other person that was known to have access to Nicole’s condo was O.J. But after the recent struggles they had as a couple he was not allowed to be seen at her condo. The third reason that O.J. Simpson should be found guilty. Investigators have ran tests from O.J.’s apartment and have found three stains on O.J.’s old bronco console were a mixture of O.J.’s blood and mixtures of both of the victim’s blood also. “We discovered that O.J. did have blood stains on the console of his bronco, and victims Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman were mixed in with the blood of O.J. Simpsons blood on the console.” The cops also had discovered blood inside of O.J.’s shower and blood splatter on his socks that belonged to Nicole Brown and Ron

Open Document