Iran rules as a theocracy. This doesn’t make it complete authoritarianism but pushes it away from being a democracy. The reason for this is, in a theocratic government the government controls how the people worship. Iran’s government is run on islamic principles and laws. When one does not follow these laws then harsh consequences are enforced by the government. Because the country is run on Islamic principles, beliefs, and values, these values are enforced in the everyday life of the people who live in Iran. This creates an authoritarian form of government. When citizens of Iran do not practice the same Islamic values the government requests, then punishment is often enforced as a political or criminal crime. For example, a man was
embassy in Tehran and seized control of the embassy. Farber provides both an international and domestic viewpoint on the crisis, which offers the reader more of an outlook on the situation. Farber’s international viewpoint provides the reader with the look into the origins of the situation and the policies the United States had put in place in Iran. These policies include the part in ousting Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh by the United States, the United States backing of the Shah and the inclination of policy makers to turn their backs to the problem of authoritarianism in Iran, which was causing suffering for the people in the country. These problems began when the United States took interest in the Middle East in the 1970’s because of its oil rich ground.
Introduction The Iranian Revolution of 1979 was one of the most significant and ambivalent events in the history of XX century. The abdication of Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi and the establishment of Islamic Republic were declared as the main results of this political phenomenon. Despite many ideological controversies, the radical Shi’a Islamist clergy and more moderate opposition parties shared the common anti-imperialist goals within the state. On the eve of revolution, they have gained the massive popular support and intended to create the unique political system.
In 1978 it marked the beginning of many political and religious disturbance in Iran. The Iranian Revolution has a history of chaos in order to put power in the hands of the people. The 1953 coup was to overthrow of the elected prime minister of Iran Mohammad Mosaddegh. Mohammad Mosaddegh almost succeeded in deposing the shah incensed Iran's intellectuals.
Twenty years after reinstating the Shah, Iranians were dissatisfied with his government and instead wanted Ayatollah Khomeini, a clergy who supported a revolutionary Islamic government. The concept of the shah and his pro-American stance did not meet the standards of Iranians. Consequently, the shah was overthrown and exiled to Egypt. In regard to President Carter’s human rights sentiment, the United States administration refrained from defending the shah during Iran’s revolution. For many months, the shah lived in various countries and expressed interest in gaining asylum in the United States.
Finally, the Shah died in July 1980 while living in Egypt. Now what the students of Iran truly wanted, for the Shah stand trial for his heinous crimes against humanity, was impossible. These events show the true power of economic goals and how they can turn a non-economic event into a truly dramatic struggle for national and international
According to document E by Rick Steve, "I asked, 'But what if you want to get somewhere in the military or government?' Seyed answered, 'Then you'd be a Muslim.' I added, 'A practicing Shia Muslim.' He said, 'Yes.'” Iran had created a successful theocracy through political and social aspects, though it has also been concluded that Iran still needs improvement in its economy to become a better theocracy.
In 1979 their government became a theocracy, a form of government based on a religion. The laws are based on the religious leaders interpretations of the Quran and Sharia Law. But women in Iran are treated very unfairly because of these laws. In document five it states, “A theocracy is a type of government that is based on a religion. It is run by religious figures and its laws are based in religious laws.
Nicaragua silences journalists and academics for its students and the Philippines holds extrajudicial killings. Poland hosts propaganda on their media to influence its people and Turkey has mass arrests. Zambia has a restrictive environment ("Puddington, Arch"). As you can see, more and more people are becoming less free. The Middle East is reflecting the uprising of other countries.
While this is happening, none of the people in Iran are fully aware of how to react because the country didn’t have a leader at the time. Marjane had to experience this imperialism during her teenage years and it played a large role in her perspective. To demonstrate this in the book, it says, “‘God did not choose the king. ’[said Marjane’s father] ‘He did so!
The freedom to practice any religion, the freedom to express ideas and opinions, the right to own a gun, and the freedom to meet together are just a few examples. Americans can live anywhere, work at any job within their qualifications, marry and raise a family and obtain an education of their choice. For the last three decades, China has had a one- child policy. In Russia, the government regulates education and all means of communication such as telephone, telegraph and radio. Iran is known for their human rights violations, which include denial of a fair trial, public executions by strangulation and stoning, and enforcing Sharia Law.
Most nations can be identified with a particular culture; this is evidently important. A country establishes a culture which allows other individuals to understand the background on a country like Iran. Within the bearings of certain cultures, individuals can face dilemmas. In addition, these dilemmas can turn into social differences within a society. In the country of Iran Marjane Satrapi encountered many social discrepancies in her youth.
Most countries have at least a slight respect for their leader, but that isn't always the case. It is very rare for middle eastern countries to disrespect a ruler, let alone speak out on their opinion. In the book Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi, the Satrapi family were adversaries of the Shah. They joined a plethora of other Iranian citizens in speaking out against the Shah. All of the Iranian adversaries banded together to bring down the rule of Reza Shah.
I had a well-known understanding in the treatment of women is Iran but did not understand why they are treated in such a disgusting manner. Men of Iran are not allowed to interact with women when
Without God as a guiding presence in her life, Marji began to rebel against the ever-encroaching fundamentalist institution as much as possible. Under the pretense of religion, Iran strictly enforced new laws against social gatherings and all items of decadence, “They found records and video-cassettes at their place. A deck of cards, a chess set, in other words, everything that’s banned… It earned him seventy-five lashes”(105). This sudden loss of mediums to enjoy one’s self and prevalence of excessive punishment enforcing the declared moral code (132) were invitations to rebel for Marji.
When Marji decides to return to Iran, she leaves her individual and social liberties behind, together with her scented detergent and eyeliner. The moment she arrives at the airport of Tehran, her bag is checked for forbidden goods as alcohol, films and magazines and she is immediately asked to fix her veil. It’s an expected but nonetheless unsettling transition. Where she had plenty of freedom in Austria, she now feels the stifling absence of it in her home country. It’s out of the question that everybody else in Iran senses the confinement too.