Why Are Lobbyists Effective

They all stated that we as American’s should not worry about the government looking into our business if we have nothing to hide. However, on June 12, 2013 Rand Paul explained the importance best when he stated” In the United States, we are supposed to have a government that is limited with its parameters established by our constitution. This notion that the federal government can monitor everyone’s phone data is a major departure from how Americans have traditionally viewed the role of the government. If this is acceptable practice, as the white house and many in both parties now say it is, then there are literally no constitutional protections that can be guaranteed anymore to citizens. In the name of security, the Constitution has become negotiable.” Because of this, the American

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is a legislative response to a number of corporate scandals that sent shockwaves through the world financial markets. Some of the biggest issues involved Enron, Tyco and WorldCom. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act, commonly referred to as SOX, attempts to strengthen corporate oversight and improve internal corporate control. The main purpose of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act is to protect shareholders from fraudulent representation in corporate financial statements. Investors need to know that the financial information they rely on is truthful, and that an independent third party has verified its accuracy.

Then standard 2 goes on, stating, "Understand the central ideas of American constitutional government and how this form of government has shaped the character of American Society". In the U.S Constitution, the first amendment first says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." Then come the words that allow us free speech and free press, as well as the rights to assemble and petition the government for a redress of grievances. This shapes characters of American society by teaching us that we have no right to discriminate against another person because we don 't share they same religious belief; or even political beliefs, going back to the overall concept of standard 2. Lastly, Standard 2 explains, "Understand the role of government in major areas of domestic and foreign policy.

Washington Post has posted on May 24, 2015 that the FBI confirms that no major terrorism cases were caught form the Patriot phone data collection (Krieger, 2015) The American Civil Liberties Union filed a law suit against the government in 2013. The case provides evidence that the Patriot Act is infringing on American’s privacy, freedom of speech and association. Within the Patriot Act, surveillance of phone records such as phone numbers, and duration is being collected across the United States. The ACLU deals with defending the civil liberties and those phone surveillance and would have drastic impact on how they advocate for Civil rights (Kaufman,

Congress, trying to not make the same mistakes as Britain, wrote that all people could protest peacefully without any violent recompense, and that they had the freedom to do so. They said, in Amendment 1 of the Bill of Rights, “Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” (U.S. Cong.). This not only meant that Congress gave rights to the people to protest their issues, but also gave them freedom of speech, press, and the ability to petition the government, much as they tried to petition with Britain with their grievances. The colonists lastly complained about the presence of a standing army in the colonies, and petitioned Britain as

Act of Parliament that is ‘on the parliamentary roll’, is considered as good law. Acts of Parliament alone are supreme. Resolutions of either House of Parliament and proclamations of the Crown that is issued under royal prerogative do not have the force of law and cannot alter the law of the land that would affect individual rights and duties. A resolution must be placed on a statutory basis to have the force of law. Treaties entered into under royal prerogative cannot alter the law of the land and it had been made clear by the courts that only under the authority of an Act of Parliament can treaties take legal

The first of many was Marbury v. Madison. The Court formed the basis and established the exercise and practice of judicial review in the United States under the Constitution. The decision defined the boundary between the branches of the American form of government so it could provide the proper checks and balances. Many Anti-federalists disagreed stating that this decision would give the federal courts too much power and authority. They pointed that nothing in the Constitution established the power of judicial review.

The American Dream is shown being influenced by social when big figures talk about their American dreams being influenced by people, opportunities, and finally when First, when big figures, such as the president, talk about their American dreams they talk about other people and how America helped him shape and achieve his/her American dream. In Obama’s speech

Lobby could be defined as the process in which a person or a group of people try to influence the government or the public institutions in order to obtain a public policy implemented. It is probably one the oldest occupation in the world. Everywhere there is power, and people in power, there are lobbyists. The lobby can be carried out by a person, a group of people (working for profit or non-profit organisation) or an agency working with various clients (for example Central Lobby Consultants –CLC- in England). There are agencies who only do lobby, and others who deal with public relations or advertising, and lobby is part of the services offered by the company.

As one of the oldest national constitutions, the United States Constitution is compulsory to uphold the sanctity of America. The Constitution was created to set forth and maintain the country’s basic rules. Not only that, but it also protects the basic rights of the People. For example, today the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage is legal in all states. This was determined from the 14th amendment which stated: “No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor hall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” In summary, the amendment to the constitution is still able to serve our country by attempting to resolve a large conflict and ensuring the rights of all Americans.

There is no right or wrong when we choose to vote or not vote. Mandatory voting is an unconstitutional force by government in the United States. If the federal government passed the law to force American people to vote, then the political policies of the United States would certainly changed from democratic politics to dictatorial

During this time period the bill of rights was written. The bill of rights states the rights that we have as a citizen of the United States. It was written by the federal government and passed by the state government. The government can’t deny us any of these rights. It gave Americans the viewpoint that even though there is a government they do not have total power over us.

An economic crisis demanded national solutions, and the Government in Washington grew fast to meet these new demands. Fundamental changes in the political landscape affecting Supreme Court appointments. There has been ten critical developments in American politics, which was the growth and bureaucratization of the Justice Department and of the White House. Also paralleling the increased role for national political institutions in American life has been growth in size and influence of federal courts, diving party government, the confirmation process had become increasingly public, the rise in power of the organized bar, increased participation by interest groups, increased media attention, advances in legal research technology and finally, the more visible role the Supreme Court has assumed in American political life has increased the perceived stakes of the nomination process for everyone that was involved. The President Appointment process involves several steps set forth by the United States Constitution.