Lianne George was a writer for New York magazine and Metro TV, and a reporter on the arts for the National Post. Currently, she is a senior editor for Maclean’s, in which the article, “Why Are We Dressing Our Daughters Like This” was published. Maclean’s is a popular magazine which covers national and worldwide political and social issues concerning families in the United States and Canada. The targeted audience is educated, in the higher middle class, and around forty years old with an equal men and women reader ratio. In the article, George clearly shows how in society younger girls are shifting towards dressing more provocatively from marketers introducing them to sexual trends. Although George uses generalized ideas and doesn’t seem to have a strong voice on the topic of girls being dressed more sexually, her goal to raise awareness is effectively presented by constructing a common ground with the readers, and allowing the readers to critically think about the problem by providing contradictions. In the article, George begins by saying how provocative clothing is becoming more popular with little girls in schools, and how school officials have had to change the dress code due to …show more content…
She frontloads the paper with many quotes and ideas from sources such as a fashion photographer Sante D’Orazio, Ron Crocco the principal of St. Augustine Catholic High School, and Lyn Mikel Brown the co author of Packaging Girlhood: Rescuing Our Daughters from Marketers’ Schemes”. Although there are too many quotes that hides George’s voice, they also give her credibility on the topic, making her ideas seem more reliable to the audience by providing a credible source. Since the audience is well educated, they are more likely to believe what experts would say on the topic of sexualized clothing rather than the editor of the
After I read this article, 16-Year-Old Reveals America 's Real Dress-Code Problem, I do agree and disagree in some points. First, I disagree with the high school principle’s phrase that is “Modest is hottest.” I think he has a problem with the word choices. Why did he use the word “hottest”? For me, I think he tried to prevent his students from the “gangs,” but he should have to change his word to another.
In "Two Ways a Woman Can Get Hurt," the author, Jean Kilbourne, talks about how women are sexualized and mistreated in the public eye by advertisements. She contends that men and women in the media are distorted as sex images and instruments: Women are portrayed as mediocre in contrast with men. For example, she states that the woman is “rewarded for her sexuality by the man’s wealth.” The media has aimed towards promoting either women or men particularly. In one advertisement, she clarifies how a tie organization publicizes ties by having ties laid in a botched up bed — as though showing that this brand of tie will help you get laid.
Introduction People from all around the world are watching Victoria’s Secret’s fashion show in every year. Especially, this fashion show catches most of teenagers’ attention, not only because the fairy tale-like stage, but also does various supermodels wearing delicate bras shows in the fashion show. There was an evident showed that women in the description of raunch culture were characterized by the increased presence and popularity of female pornographic imagery: high heels, sequins and glitter, bunny rabbit ears and exposed cleavage (Bishop, 2012). Correspondingly, Livingstone (1998) remarked that the number of young women engaged in sex acts with other women has increased and the result was linked with chiefly performed for the titillation of men, rather than reflective of genuine lesbian or bisexual desire. Also, problematic was that young women were positioned in this literature as passively absorbing sexist media and culture.
Women in the early 1900’s had very strict supertypes and expectations, so a teenage girl just wanting to dress differently and spunky, and being treated with “public condemnation and denunciation” is exactly the reason why she's writing
Sexist dress codes, shaming young girls for our country’s high teen pregnancy rate, sexual harassment, domestic violence are just a few ways how women are treated unjustly in our society. Dress Codes Dress codes in school systems are one of the largest one-sided and unjust issues in today’s society. Maureen Downey explains how “schools waste a lot of time enforcing dress codes, most of which focus on preventing young girls from distracting young boys” (2014. para 1). It is beyond unfair that girls are forbidden from wearing certain clothing articles to ensure that the immature boys next to them focus on their work instead of
This article of clothing caused much controversy amongst the public in regards to how appropriate it is to wear to schools. Many adults considered these jeans to symbolize juvenile delinquency and associated it with “stealing gas, slashing tires, and assaulting strangers.” (editorial in The Portsmouth Herald, 1957). Although they were viewed in a negative connotation, most thought it was acceptable for boys to wear them while the restriction mainly applied to girls because it wasn’t “ladylike” and invites familiarity that comes along with sex delinquency. A majority of the girls rebelled against this societal limitation and continued wearing jeans even in front of the juvenile court judge.
They know they 're breaking school rules, but they hope their gender-defying outfits will spark change.” (Sorto, 1). The boys felt that putting on dresses and showing that nothing was wrong with it was the right remark in their situation, they took the risk of getting in trouble for not following the school law. Each person had a different way of expressing their feelings towards the rules and determining right from
Words such as “pornifed”, “vulgar” and “barely there” are repeated by Devine to reiterate her point of the disgusting nature of popular fashion, and the negative effects it has on young, innocent girls. Subsequently, this positions the reader to agree with Devine and her opinion, by instilling a sense of disgust. Devine carefully crafts her arguments and focuses on a large demographic by implementing different age groups and points that would be relevant to them. As this article is published in the Sunday Herald it is most likely the target audience is older people, as they are likely to agree with her contention. Although interlaced in this article is emotive language that appeals to family values to gauge a large pool of interest.
You need to cover your shoulders,you need call home, School dress code unfairly target girls because their attire can be more distracting to male teachers and students. But boys are not necessarily being taught not to harass their female peers. By taking a girl out of class on a hot day for wearing something too revealing you basically saying that a boy's education and focus is more important than ours, because we spend time out of class to go to the office to call home for a change of clothes or even be sent home.dress codes make girls feel terrible like our bodies are inappropriate and need to be hidden. The dress code make girls feel apologetic and guilty like we’re responsible for other people's hormones and lack of self control.
As she elaborates on her idea of how women should be displayed she refers to a book called The Body Project, an intimate history of girls by Joan Jacobs Brumberg to gain credibility and build up her argument, that way the audience will realize that there is a problem that is occurring. Lipkin agrees with Joan’s idea of how girls body parts have become a “project” to fix and mold. By having Brumberg’s opinion in the essay and Lipkin elaborating on those ideas it shows that Lipkin has a concerned attitude and allows her tone to be consistent throughout her entire essay. Lipkin also uses rhetorical strategies that are blended together to support her evidence the strategies used are ethos, pathos, and
Piercy’s “Barbie Doll” takes a sarcastic approach to backlash at society and send the reader a message about what beauty really is. In “Barbie Doll”, A Barbie doll is used to show and symbolize what society views as what a female should aspire to become “perfect”. “Barbie's unrealistic body type…busty with a tiny waist, thin thighs and long legs…is reflective of our culture's feminine ideal. Yet less than two percent of American women can ever hope to achieve such dreamy measurements.”
Hanes’ purpose is to provide facts to parents so they understand what will happen if they do not censor the images their young girls see. In the article, Hanes explains that these images will lead young girls “down a path of self-objection to cyberbullying to unhealthy body images” (483). The statistics listed in the article help the author grasp the attention of the reader, causing the reader to feel a sense of urgency when understanding this issue. Stephanie Hanes, author of the essay “Little Girls or Little Women? The Disney Princess Effect”, explains that our society should be worrying about the increase in sexualization amongst young girls.
Any girl who has attended a public high school understands the daily dilemma of dress code. On those scorching hot days as the school year approaches summer, many girls can be found scavenging through their closet for a “school appropriate” outfit or one they won’t melt into a sweaty puddle in. Her dresses will show too much leg, her tops will inappropriately expose her shoulder or collar bone, and her shorts will be too short — at least that 's what the school says. Dress code in modern day high schools should be boycotted because they are a violation to student and parents rights, sexist, out of date, a double standard, and they disrupt a female students education. It 's fair to agree with a policy that claims stringent dress codes increase the emphasis on academics and reduce the pressure of socioeconomic status; however, these dress codes violate the students First Amendment right to freedom of expression and the parents’ Fourteenth Amendment right to raise their children in their own way.
Reporter Kelly Wallace, from CNN writes a piece about Catherine Pearlman, a mother of two who said her daughter was, now 13 was told by her teacher she couldn 't wear her yoga pants to school because “ Boys would get turned on and then be embarrassed.” The article then goes on to show the mothers anger towards the sexuall “lessson” that was made to her daughter. Her daughter was just 13. She does not understand why the outfit her mother bought her is wrong. It is not just this one teacher who has this mindset Kosher Casual writes their five benefits of dress code.
With some dress codes making it against school rules for girls to have bra straps showing, wear tank tops, have more than a singular piercing in each ear, wear certain length shorts, and wear even somewhat tight clothes. According to the website Education Week they state, “That’s because a lot of school dress codes are gendered, and over 90 percent ban clothing worn predominantly by girls.” This shows that most dress codes don’t even show a focus or interest in what boys wear and how what they're wearing could cause problems. This matters because it shows how sexist the dress codes of most schools truly are. Most schools like to talk about how they just don’t want the clothing that girls are wearing to be a distraction.