Morgan Krieger
Econ 212
5 May 2017
Analysis of Freakonomics Economic is known as the dismal science for good reason. The usual way of studying the economy is very strict and matter-of-fact in order to try to describe something that is very hard to definitively explain. This idea of why people do what they do is discussed in depth in Freakonomics, a book by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner. They argue that people react in a market because of incentives. The three basic types of incentives are moral, social, and economic. By looking at unconventional situations, like bagel selling, crack cocaine dealers, and the Ku Klux Klan, Levitt and Dubner make generalizations about people and the actions we take in our lives and the effects these actions
…show more content…
Who cheats and why? Even the most honorable often cheat because of incentives. This is what Chapter one of Freakonomics discusses. Sumo Wrestlers and Teachers have this in common. In the case of school teachers, a study of the Chicago Public School System had shown that some teachers were cheating on standardized tests because of the incentives of doing so. By helping their students pass the yearly tests, the teachers and schools receive benefits because the system offers incentives if their students score high. Another incidence of cheating that Levitt and Dubner discuss in sumo wrestling. Sumo wrestling is an ancient sport in Japan where it is considered to be sacred and honorable, but it was still found to be prone to cheating. Rankings and everything associated …show more content…
The Klan came to power with the aid of their secret nature that involved handshakes, code words, etc. Most people knew little about the Klan until Stetson Kennedy infiltrated the society and revealed many secrets to try to dismantle the Klan. Kennedy saw that his local chapter was comprised of poorly educated, low earning men who needed to vent their frustrations to someone. Kennedy revealed their secrets to a radio show, where children learned the Klan’s secrets and turned the seriousness of the Klan into a child’s game. Many men stopped attending meetings after this. Real estate agents operate in a similar way as did the Klan. Homeowners believe that agents will help them sell their home for the best price. However, agents serve their own interests by using certain words and other information. They want to sell a house as quickly as possible, so they may pressure the homeowner to take the first offer that is received, even if waiting would be more profitable to you. Real estate agents also market houses in a way to make a house sound less desirable or new, even if there is nothing wrong with it. In this case, the real estate agents are the experts. Those selling their homes are more likely to do what the agent says because the agent has more information, even if they are abusing
The Scandal Cheating has never been nor will ever be acceptable. There are so many ways it has been done, some severe, some less severe. The majority of the time people will look down on those who cheat. People often enjoy watching sports, and at times it is a great way to connect with others.
Instructions: Please retain questions and numbering. Each question is worth 2.5 points. Incorrect, incomplete and/or unclear answers will lose points. 1. What was the reasoning of the Federal Housing Administration for not permitting African Americans in the newly developed suburbs?
Levitt and Dubner classify Freakonomics as a book having “no such unifying theme” (14), but all the unique topics discussed throughout the text connect back together in order to show the hidden side of human nature. The argument that the wide variety of topics and their abstract descriptions all link together draws the attention of a large audience and connects to issues that society is currently facing or has recently confronted. Freakonomics, organized as an argumentative piece, asserts that “commerce without morality,” or the conducting of business without a sense of what is right or wrong, is triggered by human actions that are led by incentives, causing changes in the economy. Levitt and Dubner do not explicitly state their argument, but through the use of ethos, pathos,
Freakonomics Review Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner’s Harper 2005 New York Times bestselling novel, Freakonomics, digs deep into the hidden side of economics. From comparing the safety of swimming pools and guns to discovering the truth about drug dealing, this book will have the reader questioning everyday life. Although the book uses odd examples and intriguing comparisons, the chapters themselves are tedious and lengthy. Steven D. Levitt is an economist that went to Harvard and MIT for his degree.
An honor code can be so effective that “many schools with academic honor codes allow students to take their exams without proctors present, relying on peer monitoring to control cheating” (Source F). Despite this system, there is research that “indicates that the significantly lower levels cheating” (Source F) at schools with honor codes. This is possible because there is a peer culture that denounces cheating, making kids embarrassed to commit academic dishonesty. Such a peer culture was formed by educating the students about the value of academic dishonesty.
In this era of sports, There are many cheaters in sports because they want to be the best out of everyone. The most common cheating in sports is when athletes take steroids to dope in sports, to increase performance in sports. Did you know in the Summer Olympics of 2016, 100 Russian athletes were banned from the Summer Olympics due to doping in sports. Doping in sports is when athletes use medications that are not allowed to take to improve their performance in sports. The most common type of doping is stimulants to overcome stress and challenges that athletes have.
Housing values have plunged and people are losing their shirts. Yes people did buy in the heat of the market. And now the crash has caused their values to plummet. I know you've heard this over and over, but it happens to be the brutal truth: for a large number of those deals the people should have never have been allowed to buy the homes, and 'creative financing' should have been suspect. No money down deals, loans such as pay option ARM's (where you paid a smaller payment with the interest charges adding to the balance on the back end) seemed too good to be true.
The student author of the editorial seems to respect the honor code Groveton expects from its students, yet the author assumes the code itself is solely responsible for the alleged reduction in cheating at the school. Citing a survey to further empahsize the aforementioned assumption, the author only invites more speculation on the topic rather than providing further evidence as intended. While cheating is a frowned upon topic in all universities, this editorial is rife with assumptions and fallacious deduction, rendering the argument weak and unconvincing. First, the reporting system for Groveton 's novel honor code and the "old-fashioned" system it replaced both relyed solely on a human witness for reporting. Teachers used to monitor students and the new protocol calls for students to monitor each other and report any instances of cheating.
Not so long ago, the honor code system was brought up to the U.S. Senate whether if it’s best to have it input schools to lessen cheating behaviors from students. It was not welcomed at first for those that were against the honor codes and as well of the people in the Senate. Even though after all the revisions and such, some voted to agree to have the codes set in place that would be good enough to have around in school; albeit honor codes don’t always work around schools, and cheating or some type of academic dishonesty will always happen— it’s inevitable. It seems by having these honor codes set in place, it would oppose the cheating and consequences against students. As the ones who have voted for the honor code wanted that safe, confidential, and knowing that their hard work and knowledge wasn’t used against them.
“Since “everyone else” is cheating, they have no choice but to do the same to remain competitive. And there is growing evidence many students take these habits with them to college.” (McCabe, Donald and Pavela). More and more colleges are using the honor codes. The honor code has helped to prevent cheating.
Student’s value their social lives and professors value their work. This is not to be said that students do not care about their education and classes, students do try to get good grades, but will do the minimum to attain it. For this exact reason cheating to get ahead is extremely
Jawedullah Khushzad Professor Silva MGMT-3614-02 January 15, 2018 ASSIGNMENT Week 3 Chapter 6 PERCEPTION AND INDIVIDUAL DECISION MAKING ETHICAL DILEMMA PAGE 198 CHEATING IS A DECISION Questions 6-11) Do you know classmates who have cheated in school? Have you ever cheated?
But this applies to only those who resort to cheating ways. Sports persons always hit the headlines for a lot of controversies like using drugs, playing for two clubs, abusing the fans of other countries or clubs or inappropriate behaviour in the field or breaking the code of conduct and so on and so forth. The problem does not stop here; the sports medicine which the players take is also causing serious debates and discussion. Issues like faking injury, losing intentionally to get a stronger opponent and failing the gender test had also surfaced in the
Salespeople who act unethically risk their company’s business, their jobs and careers, and possible legal consequences. Therefore, I do not think most professional sellers would take that risk. However, the fact that there are laws and consequences for deceitful and unethical practices underscores that it does exist and could be an issue.
Our parents, coupled with our environment (the people we associate with, our music and the literature we read), as we grow older, dictate what we fear. A mix bag of fears come from people purchasing property and usually those fears are caused by one person, the Estate Agent or at least the misconception that they are all crooks twissling their moustaches waiting to rip you off.