Because some animals who used to be as test subjects could create a new cure to heal humanity, develop new surgical techniques and discover new cosmetic brands like mascara, eyeliner, foundation, and lips gloss. Nevertheless, people should realize the fact that the animals are creatures who have souls, not an equipment or a tool to mess with. Whatever you discover, people have to re-discover it again. Not only animals who suffer due these experiments (Peter Tatchell,2009). Likewise, it is also important to know that some animals cannot be saved after they face their destiny through these horrible and failing experiments.
Animal experimentation is very serious. Animals are tested on because they are said to replicate almost identically and closely to humans. Soe animals have many biological similarities to humans that make them good models for specific diseases, such as monkeys, they are good for testing the polio vaccine because they are biologically similar to humans. Law requires animal testing, but people are trying to make animal testing optional instead. Currently, scientists are working on ways to substitute animal testing, such as using synthetic skin or human cell cultures.
People all over the world say it's the closest thing were ever going to get to an actual human being. There is a heated debate on whether animal testing should be avoided in the U.S. Should the animals be able to go threw alarming experiences that can cost them their life forever, or should the innocent animals be tested on to make sure the products we use are safe and fit our liking?
Introduction Animals testing have significantly contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge in general and to biomedical progress specifically. Many example showing that laboratory animals in medical development and other aspects have significantly influenced human health and reduced suffering, for example improved diagnosis of infectious disease (Hau, Jann, Schapiro & Steven, 2002). But since 1960s and 1970s, animals testing protests has gained prominence and strength, people start to argue is it moral to continue “cruel” animal testing. Animal Testing is a Moral Act In the rest of this article, I shall apply different concept under utilitarianism try to discuss whether animal testing are moral acts. It is important to notice that (1) in this article, applying the general idea of utilitarianism which is “the greatest happiness of greatest number” and (2) the animals testing under the rules and regulations.
Also drugs and vaccines applied on animals fail on human clinical trails. However, Animal testing plays a vital role in a great medical advances and participate in many life-saving cures and treatments in last few centuries. Animal testing plays an important and effective role in both human health and veterinary as well . Firstly, for human health ,
Some people, especially the Animal Rights Group, consider that this kind of experiment is cruel and inhumane therefore it has to be banned. But, I believe animal testing for medication should not be banned because of the contribution to modern medication, lack of alternative object, and the rules of animal testing that I’ll explain further in the following paragraph. Animal testing has contributed a lot to the modern medication. Penicillin, insulin, and Polio vaccine are some life-saving cures and medical treatment which was found by using animals
Whether it be cloning pets to cloning the dairy cows that produce the most milk, people tend to feel strongly about whether or not cloning should be legal in the United States. Due to the unconfirmed nature of cloning outcomes, all animal cloning (particularly pet cloning) should be outlawed. This is a very common view on cloning held particularly by veterinarians; however, there are still some people that feel cloning should remain legal. There are many cons to cloning. The most important reason not to clone is that the wellbeing of the animals involved in the cloning is not top priority.
How ethical and moral can experimenting with animals be? I am going to discuss the views of these issues concerning the ethics that goes along with experimenting with animals in this passage. Firstly, animals may be subject to experimentation or be modified into conditions useful for gaining knowledge about human diseases or for testing human potential treatments. For example, it was discovered long ago that rats have similar genetic build-up and the identical systems as human being, so rats have been used along for experimentation. According to the animal research: the ethics of animal experimentation that was published in July the sixtieth 2010,some people argue that experimentation with animals should end because it is wrong to treat animals merely as tools for further knowledge while others ague that animal are better target as opposed to using human beings.
Introduction Life is based on love, care and hope, not necessarily between humans only. We should love and care about all living organisms, from bugs to animals in the wild. People nowadays hope for a healthier life for their families and themselves; in order to achieve such a goal they sacrifice the lives of many animals for the selfish purpose of leading a healthier life. They offer up animal lives for animal testing. However, I’m sure we all lost a beloved one to cancer at one point of our lives, and we wished that there were a way to help them.
Defining ethical: This relates to moral principles or knowledge with dealing with a certain situation. Moral relativism and the self interest theory will be used. And the WOK I will be using is emotion. Primary Knowledge Claim: Seeing that there is a big number of people accepting that it is acceptable to test on animals I think: I think it is ethically wrong to have animals being experimented for the betterment. 25 million animals are experimented on for biomedical researches, science education (dissecting heart, where animals are dead) and cosmetics (for mascaras and liquid liners), every year in the US.