Through research, outreach, education, legislation, and policy change, NEAVS advocates for replacing animals with modern alternatives that are ethically, humanely, and scientifically superior. This article was written to inform and persuade those who are using animals as test subjects that there are many alternatives available, which are more effective and more reliable than animal testing. The article mentions several different alternative methods that can be used as opposed to animal testing. It mentions that in-vitro testing isn’t the only form of non-animal alternative testing that exists, as most commonly thought. It also gives multiple cases where animal testing was strictly unreliable and caused great mishaps among many communities relying on this treacherousness.
Animal testing is a highly controversial subject, disputed among many. It is evidently not pleasant to animals, but it is extremely beneficial for scientific findings. Some say it is a necessary evil, and some say it is animal cruelty. Others cannot simply make up their minds about this subject. Although many people are against animal testing, it must continue due to medicine development, advantages of testing animals over other subjects, and the regulated experiments for the animals’ safety.
There are many cruelty-free brands, that are seemingly one-hundred percent against animal testing. However, many cruelty-free brands are owned by larger parent companies that do test on animals. For example; NYX, The Body Shop, IT Cosmetics, and Urban Decay are all cruelty-free brands owned by the parent company L’Oreal (crueltyfreekitty.com). L’Oreal does test on animals; this makes supporting the brands under it a harder decision. One of the reasons why people support these brands is because they hope that the parent company will take the hint.
In the field of medical testing the use of animal is commonly seen. The use of animals in testing is currently a hot issue. In an article on the Norther Star, author Nathan Fulkerson talks about how animal testing has led to medical breakthroughs. Yet, Animal rights groups and organizations have been pushing for the banning of animal testing. Their reason for pushing the ban is that using the animal testing is cruel and inhumane.
The rights of animals is a topic that comes up frequently, but people often turn their cheek the other way when it comes to their possessions being a product of cruelty. The experiments that animals in the testing world often go through can be described as borderline torture. And often, animals are bred specifically to be tested on. Animal testing is often used to test products such as cosmetics, drugs, food additives, supplements, household products, pesticides, and industrial chemicals (Murnaghan). These experiments let companies look at how much of a drug is absorbed into an
Animals can feel just as much pain, loss, and fear as any human yet scientists continue to expose them to inhumane experiments. If scientists keep wasting their time on the same outdated methods they will impede the discovery of life saving technology. Scientists could find countless cures in less time by using new methods versus continuing to test on innocent animals. Millions of lives could be saved yet the majority of scientists refuse to evolve with the science. Adding the fact that using animals has proven to be a dangerous and unreliable procedure, it is no wonder that people are supporting the elimination of this tired system.
Animals as much as you love them, hate them, so do they deserve to suffer? I mean come on people they think, they live, they can feel sad too. They can have extraordinary intelligence they can help us, they can be our companions, they can be our friends. They are worth much more than a scientist lab rat. Yes testing may be necessary to get us medicine but is it worth killing or harming animals?
Many different species of animal are used for animal testing some common ones include mice, fish, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, and hamsters. One of the reasons why some people believe that animal testing is beneficial is because it uses animals that are a close match to humans, this however is not true. Animal cell structures and human cell structures are not alike, and therefore animals make poor test subjects. The majority of animal tests do not contribute to safer makeup products. Animal testing does not have a value in reassuring the safety of makeup products and it has been proven that computers and new modern technology can be more
Animal testing is used among many companies all over the world. Is it useful, appreciable, successful? Animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, has a poor success rate, and is unnecessary. Many think otherwise, such as that animal testing is helpful with curing diseases, but over all the time and trials there’s too much harm caused to too many animals. First of all, animal testing is cruel.