It also showed that animal testing does not only help humans but animals too. I am going to include this information in my paper to show the people who are fighting against animal testing are fighting improvements with humans and animals. Cressey, Daniel. "Animal Research: Battle Scars." Nature News.
This kind of experiment has been conducted long time ago by some scientists such as Aristoteles, Herophilus, and Erasistratus which performed the experiments to discover the functions of living organisms and is used until now. Chimpanzees, mice, dogs, and fish are some animals which is frequently used in the experiment. Many of this experiments (which was conducted on animals) contributed to life-saving cures and treatments such as the discovery of insulin, polio vaccine, etc. However, animal testing for medication also drew controversy and debate. Some people, especially the Animal Rights Group, consider that this kind of experiment is cruel and inhumane therefore it has to be banned.
The opposing side would like to say that the animals are treated inhuman and cruelly. This is a lie the scientists have to treat the animals humanely so that the test are reliable . The research animals are cared for by veterinarians, husbandry specialists, and animal health technicians to ensure their well-being and more accurate test. Also the scientists can not treat animals in a inhuman or cruel manner or will be fined or arrested for animal abuse. The scientists have to treat all the test subject humanely because if not and someone gets hurt or dies the scientists will be responsible for the accident.
Without animal testing, we will become the subject of experiments. People should be aware that without any alternative in place, it would be the same as saying that human rights are less important than animal rights. Human beings desperately need animal testing for the development of cures as well as for the sake of civilisation. If it wasn’t for animal testing, human beings would not be alive today. Animal testing has played a significant role in developing numerous medications that are absolutely necessary for us to live such as antibiotics, penicillin, and
The Suggestion was made that scientists should explore alternative options, such as testing on cell and tissue cultures. On the other hand, Sabin also puts forward an argument in support of animal testing, as her dear late husband Albert Sabin conducted many tests on animals whilst perfecting his vaccine against polio. The sacrifice of these animals has enabled entire generations of humans to grow up without fear of the crippling effects of polio. Animal rights advocates who see animal experimentation as cruel and wasteful overlook the fact that it has been instrumental in developing medicines that have saved countless human
Audience Throughout the centuries our views on animal testing has drastically changed. Animal experimentation is when a live animal is forced to perform something or get performed on, that likely causes pain and suffering. Animal experiments include injecting or force feeding animals with harmful substances, exposing animals to radiation, forcing animals to inhale toxic gases, or surgically removing animals’ organs to cause damage. Animal testing can have both pros and cons to it. A pro to animal testing is that it doesn 't put humans to harm.
While testing on animals might help humans slightly, is it what we should do? First, humans test animals for cures that are supposed to work on humans, but testing only proves how it works on different animals. Secondly, when something is tested on animals and is proven safe and effective, it can still be useless or detrimental to humans
It is still not right with many advanced technologies today, there should be an alternative route instead of testing on animals, human could be the one to volunteer for simple experiments. In glass testing, such as studying cell cultures in a petri dish, can produce more relevant results than animal testing because human cells can be used. ("Scientific Alternatives to Animal Testing: A Progress Report.") There are micro-dosing, giving small doses to test for any reactions, and human could be volunteered for the experiment, and then the blood are analyzed after the small doses onto the skin. ("Scientific Alternatives to Animal Testing: A Progress Report,") There are artificial human skin, such as the commercially available products EpiDerm and ThinCert, is made from sheets of human skin cells grown in test tubes or plastic wells and can produce more useful results than testing chemicals on animal skin.
Animal testing is cruel, unjust, and wasteful, and it needs to stop. It is used to test cosmetics, to gain scientific knowledge, and for tests in schools. The Humane Society states that animal testing is tests performed on live animals for basic biology, medicinal, safety, or health research. Even small procedures have the capabilities to cause the animal high stress or discomfort. Some animals are used in future experiments, but most are killed soon after the tests.
These animals are tested with things such as medicinal substances, cosmetics, and food additives as well as tested to learn more about diseases and biological disorders. Many of these tests are useful and important in order to make sure that if a human were to consume them, they would have no adverse or negative effects. However, if it will cause harm to the animals, they should not be done, and most if not all are likely to potentially create physical and psychological problems. “Although pain and suffering are subjective experiences, studies from multiple disciplines provide objective evidence of animals' abilities to experience pain (Beck and Ferdowsian, “Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing”).” Since these animals are obviously able to feel pain, the testing should be precautious and considerate of the animal’s welfare. Nuno Henrique Franco, a graduate in the Laboratory Animal Science group, agreed saying, “While animal experiments have played a vital role in scientific and biomedical progress and are likely to continue to do so in the foreseeable future, it is nonetheless important to keep focusing on the continuous improvement of the well-being of laboratory animals, as well as further development of replacement alternatives for animal experiments (Franco, “Animal