Many of the Presidents of the United States became presidents just because of their campaign; multiple presidents have used the campaign they are a common man and will do the best for every citizen. Andrew Jackson however was more of a king than a common man for several reasons. Jackson ignored Congress and continued with the Indian Removal Act which pushed the indians western of the Mississippi river. Jackson also held up Congress with his vetoes. If Andrew Jackson wanted an act to be passed or denied he either vetoed Congresses ruling or he declared what he wanted and everyone went with it. Jackson also adopted the Spoils System which was constitutionally unjust. The way Jackson acted showed how he was a king was by adapting the Spoils System, enacting the Indian Removal Act, and holding up congress with his vetoes. The first reason that Andrew Jackson was more of a king is he ignored Congress. In 1830, Andrew Jackson made the Indians sell their land, and forced them to reservations west of the Mississippi river. Congress had made a ruling that the Indians were allowed to keep their land, but “King Jackson” said he had already made his ruling and forced them to the Trail of Tears at gunpoint (President Jackson and Indian Removal). Andrew Jackson just ignoring Congress was a problem that showed he wasn’t a common man. The …show more content…
Jackson vetoed the the recharter bill for the Bank of US, he vetoed a bill that allowed the federal government to purchase stock, and he also vetoed the Indian removal act (Jackson’s Economic Issues). Congress rules laws for a reason and if Jackson is vetoing every single thing that they are doing he is making them take extra time to do things. When he vetoes something it then has to go all the way back through the system, and in the end most of the time Jackson did what he wanted no matter what Congress said so it became a waste of
It is clear from the documents that Andrew Jackson acted like a king/tyrant. One reason that Andrew Jackson acted like a king was because he didn't listen to congress and he went against the U.S. Constitution. Document four stated that he sent soldiers to force Native Americans out of their homes at gunpoint and into stockades. After a few months of living in the stockades, the soldiers forced the Native Americans into the Indian territory called Oklahoma.
Andrew Jackson was said to be one of the worst presidents in the United States. He made some bad choices during his presidential years, which lead to him being capitalized as a monarch or a king. With the United States’ history with kings that was not a good thing. Jackson was very stubborn and strong willed, he didn’t take no for an answer. Being strong willed is normally a good thing in certain situations, but in Jacksons situation it was not.
He had a habit on vetoing many things that he did not approve or that were not correct. Jackson did not respect things like the Constitution of the United States neither the U.S Bank. (DOC 3) An example is his veto of the Bank of the United States. In his message to the Congress (DOC 4), Jackson explained why he had vetoed the charter of the bank.
Document also shows that president Jackson was a hero of the common man because people traveled 500 miles to see Jackson’s inauguration. Mr. Moore taught us that Andrew Jackson was the first “self-made man” to become president. Others might say that Andrew Jackson acted like a king because Jackson gave the presidency more power over the economy, the government and the people. Document
Andrew Jackson has used his powers that were given to him in his presidency. Jackson shutdown the second national bank with a veto. Andrew Jackson was elected president in 1824 and again in 1832. People said that Jackson would act like a King and not a presidente. Andrew Jackson was not a champion of democracy because he misused his ability to veto he also, abused the spoil system finally while he was the president's slavery went up.
Andrew Jackson paved his way to the top by serving in both the House and Senate. Gained recognition as a war hero after serving in the War of 1812. He laid the framework of democracy by endeavoring to make America superior, but the ways he handled the National Bank, Spoil System, and Indian Removal made Andrew Jackson develop into a non-democratic. One way that illustrates how Jackson is non-democratic is supported by the situation that occurred for the National Bank. To begin with, Jackson sent a veto to congress discussing the bank.
It states in Jackson’s “State of the Union Speech” that he wanted to give the Cherokee, a Native American tribe, a new home on what is called “Indian Territory”. Jackson believed that the Cherokee would be happy in their new area and they all wanted to leave, and this is why many people believe Jackson was democratic, but the Cherokees didn’t want to leave. The Cherokee was forced to leave because
The Bank War was another event that took place during his Presidency. Jackson believed that the Second Bank of the United States favored the wealthy over the common people. He sought to remove all of the funds from the Second Bank and transport them into State banks giving the common the people better access to the money. Andrew even added Texas to the territory. Andrew Jackson accomplished many things, especially domestic policies while in
He made the debt of the nation worse, yet he started the Indian removal allowing the country to expand even more. He also pushed equality among Americans by allowing them to vote and have the opportunity to get into office. Jackson supported the ordinary people by giving them more of a chance in the government. He extended the right to vote to many new people also allowing them to be able to run for office; therefore the government did not favor the wealthy and powerful anymore. Jackson's supporters disliked and did not trust the government and banks.
Although Andrew Jackson had many faults, here are some acts that were not fully inadequate. Firstly, he vetoed the Second Bank of the United States, which was believed to have too much power and was unfairly benefiting the wealthy at the expense of ordinary citizens. He also modernized the navy and strengthened the military, which helped the United States defend itself against foreign threats and was a strong advocate for the Union. These things can be seen as favorable to the “common folk” but some of his acts were at the expense of others. For example, Jackson supported states rights to appeal to the people, but he drew the line at nullification where states have the right to veto a law they don't see fit within their boundaries, which also
Because of these infringements on the rights of the people, Andrew Jackson was not a champion of the common man; the nickname “King Andrew,” from his opponents was accurate. When he was elected president, Andrew Jackson felt that he needed to remove John Quincy Adams’ appointees from office. To him, the clear answer was to replace them with his own followers and friends, creating a government where only one political party was effectively represented by presidential appointments. This use of the spoils system put people who were not qualified in powerful positions simply as a reward for supporting Jackson. He also had thirteen unofficial members in his cabinet to advise him.
Vetoing is to allow or reject a decision or proposal made by a law-making body. The overall reason Jackson is known to be a tyrant is his abuse of power. The amount of vetoes he confirmed truly justifies the fact that he took advantage of his power. “The Second Bank of the United States was founded in 1816 and had a 20-year charter approved by congress that gave it the power to act exclusively as the federal government’s financial agent.” (Source 4)
Does Andrew Jackson Deserve to be on the 20-dollar bill? In my belief Andrew Jackson does not belong on the 20-dollar bill, due to the simple fact of that in 1836 Andrew Jackson tried over throwing the U.S national bank because he believed that hard currency like gold and sliver should be used. Andrew Jackson in some sense is an ironic placement on any paper currency in the United States. Although this topic is very controversial in the United States. I will try and clarify my belief about why Andrew Jacksons placement on the twenty dollar bill and why he should be reconsidered.
Although Jackson was important, he was part of many terrible things. Around the 1820s there were many major indian tribes in eastern United States such as Cherokee, Chickasaw, Creek and Seminole. This soon came to a change. Andrew Jackson thought these Indians were in the way of eastern development, using the Indian Removal Act which the congress had approved he decided to kick them out and send them west. In 1831 the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Indians had the right to self government and the United States could not interfere with that.
One of the biggest thing that Jackson had done as a president was in 1832. Jackson vetoed a bill that would renew the second bank charter early. Jackson stated “I will kill it!”. He said this because he didn’t like the bank at all and he believed that it made the rich richer and the poor poorer. He said in his veto message “It is easy to conceive that great evils to our country and its institutions might flow from such a concentration of power in the hands of a few men irresponsible to the people.”