Articles Of Confederation Vs Hamilton Essay

476 Words2 Pages

Hamilton began his political career by serving in the Congress of the Confederation from 1782-1783. The Congress of the Confederation was the original lawmaking body of the United States after the American Revolution. Hamilton served as a representative for New York. The Congress of the Confederation was governed under the rules of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution of the United States.

Hamilton’s experience serving in Congress shaped his political views. Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress did not have the power to tax citizens. Individual states could decide whether or not they were going to give money to the federal government. It was impossible to effectively govern the country …show more content…

In the summer of 1787, the Constitutional Convention was held. The Convention was held in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The purpose of the Convention was to discuss the problems with the Articles and create a new constitution. Each state sent representatives to this meeting, and Hamilton was a representative for New York.

There was intense disagreement between the representatives at the Constitutional Convention. Two opposing groups formed. The first group was the Federalists. The Federalists favored a strong federal government.

The second group was the Antifederalists who were led by Thomas Jefferson. The Antifederalists worried that a strong federal government would be too much like having a king. Instead, the Antifederalists wanted the state governments to have most of the power. They worried that a strong federal government would take away people’s rights.

Hamilton was a key leader of the Federalists. He wanted the new constitution to make the federal government stronger. He especially favored the creation of a national bank. He also wanted the federal government to have the authority to collect taxes. Hamilton, along with John Jay and James Madison, wrote many of The Federalist Papers which were essays that explained why the the states should ratify, or accept, a new

Open Document