I will not banned books because each book has a purpose. I wouldn’t banned these books because it would be like taking away some knowledge from the kids. You cant take history away just because of the violence. For example if they banned religious books because its against another religion it wouldn’t be right. People wont know what happened in history if we banned them. There is also different perspective of things. Someone could have different looks into religion. Learning about the different races and cultures. Different life styles like poor and rich people. You cant tell others what they can and can not read. You cant limit peoples knowledge. You cant force people to read things they don’t want. Cant banned books just because
But, we do have restricted or banned books, Even in school, students are not allowed to read certain books because of content of the knowledge of the book. Henceforth, we ban books from the public to save information that they do not want us to know. But, we are somewhat different. We do not burn any books. We allow many children and many adults to read for their own interest and knowledge to grow, learn, etc.
Everyone is miserable in a dystopia but, everyone in a utopia is happy. In a dystopia the people are you usually abused by their government. In a utopia the people are usually treated fairly and nicely. Although, many people believe war defines utopia and peace defines utopia, in reality bad government actions define a dystopia and knowledge defines a utopia. You can see this in any type of literature.
One book, such as Fahrenheit 451, being banned from a school library could lead to the entire collection of books being examined with possible removal. While restricting certain books in school libraries doesn’t ban them from public libraries, it does significantly reduce the amount of students that will have access to them. Banning certain books from a school’s curriculum harms teachers just as much as it does students. Teachers have to curve their lesson plans around which books are deemed banned, inhibiting the way they are able to reach and engage with their students. This limits the potential educational value of lessons.
Banning is never what it seems to be. In the banning of a book can be a person just believes there are things that kids shouldn't read. But they don't understand anything about our world. Banning a book that can help many lives just because of one thing isn't right.
Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature, and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.
Books can create portals to different life experiences and encourage reading. A few schools and libraries have challenged the educational value of some books, however, therefore leading them to eventually be prohibited in a particular place. Each reason may be different depending on the book and the location of the exclusions. Books are icons of literature and their value should outshine the occasionally offensive topic. Be that as it may, there are multiple reasons why books should be taught and included in a curriculum.
Books are an essential way to gain knowledge whether they are controversial or not. Thousands of books have been banned from public libraries and schools due to being deemed ‘inappropriate’ by parents, administrators, or religious leaders. Whether Americans should ban books in public libraries and schools is an often debated topic. This censorship of books is dangerous, as it restricts the American people's’ ability to access information, leaving Americans ignorant. Historically, banning books is not a new practice.
First, there are many cons to banning books. “Parents may control what their own children read, but don't have a right to restrict what books are available to other people. ”(ProCon.org, 2) Parents do not have the right to take books away from everyone, but they do have the right to control what a child is reading. Parents are 42% of the reason that many books become challenged or banned.
Censorship Censorship in schools may not be the best choice for enriching the future minds of the United States of America. Children of the United States of America should have the right to learn about anything for it is there amended right. Taking knowledge away from them and censoring it should not be the answer to keeping our Children pure it should be what we teach our kids. We need to teach them right and wrong that is what will keep our child’s mind pure. Many books are being taken off shelves every day in student libraries because a couple people do not think that the book is suitable for children.
Not letting your children and even just normal people read something because you don’t see it correct does it make it correct for them not to read that book. Banning and censoring books is keeping the truth while telling lies and holding mankind from moving
There are countless reasons that everybody should know why books are being banned all over the world! One of the reasons is that parents do not want their children to be exposed to inappropriate topics. Moreover, some books discusses topics that people object to like dark arts and homosexuality. However, there are also reasons why books should not be banned. When children enjoy books, it improves their vocabulary, and it teaches them life lessons.
If kids are not exposed to this material than they might not truly understand big pieces of history. If books were banned we would have less options to read and our education wouldn 't be as strong. In conclusion, books should not be banned. If books were banned then our education world lesson and our knowledge would be much slimmer.
Book banning is unacceptable because librarians and teachers ban the text for their content, and not for their effect on students.
“American citizens who care about the improvement of education are urged to join students, teachers, librarians, administrators, boards of education, and professional and scholarly organizations in support of the students’ right to read” (The Students Right to Read). Citizens should be allowed to stand up if they believe books should not be banned. It is important that writers should be able to have their books out to the public without getting banned. “Challengers often employ a definition that maintains that banning materials is the only true form of censorship,”(Knox 740). Censorship of books is common and a real problem.
However, there are people that argue against the idea of censoring books in schools. One counterpoint of the argument of the topic is that banning books hinders students from discovering new things and obtaining knowledge. According to the article, “Banning Books: An Overview”, Michael Aliprandini and Carolyn Sprague state, “The core arguments against the banning of books have been based on protecting the rights of individuals to free speech as well as to promote intellectual freedom – the rights protected by the First Amendment.” They are basically explaining how arguments of book banning connect to the idea of intellectual freedom and protecting individual rights, which are implied in the First Amendment. Censorship of books can be expressed as violating the rights and freedom of the individuals.