Say you are walking down main street on a warm, sunny day with your best friend or perhaps someone close to you ,and all of a sudden this special person collapses. If this person is very dear to you, you would definitely try and save them; especially if this person may be about to lose their life. You would not walk away or stare at your boyfriend or girlfriend if they all of a sudden stopped breathing or hurt themselves severely. So why do we do this to other people? Why is it legal for a bystander to watch as someone’s life slowly slips away when this bystander could possibly save the person in need? Although you indeed could be a complete and total stranger to the person hurt, that person is someone’s life; that person has people who love them so very much and that person has a life left to live. …show more content…
However, there is good news to come of this tragedy! Many of the paparazzi ,acting as bystanders at the scene, legally violated laws by doing nothing to try and save the passengers in the car,.The paparazzi in Paris just watched as lives slowly faded away and they got penalized for this by something known as the “Good Samaritan Law.” This law states that a person must come to the aid of someone else in severe need instead of just watching and not
Do you own a vehicle with a crack in the windshield? Are you tired of the damage, but you don't think you can afford to have your windshield replaced? If you don't have the money to cover the cost of the windshield replacement and you don't want to make your insurance rate go up by filing a claim, you may think that you're stuck with a broken windshield. If you live in an area where you can be ticketed for having a damaged windshield, this may be even more worrying for you. Fortunately, replacement may not be your only option.
For example, car accidents occur every day. Drivers that pass by them have the choice of either pulling over to help them or ignoring it and going on with their life. Little do they know, the person in the accident could be severely injured, but this person
With the growth of society and the fast pace of everyday life, people had slowly forgotten their sympathy and ethical responsibility. In the “Can The Law Make Us Be Decent?” contributed by Jay Sterling Silver, he expresses his feeling of irritation how people goes unpunished even though they stood by to watch people dying. People should be punished for ignoring others in need of help because it’s inhumane. People should be penalized for overlooked the troubled one because they didn’t support those in need even though they have the ability to help. In the article, “If Decency Doesn’t, Law Should Make Us Samaritans” written by Gloria Allred and Lisa Bloom is about the car crash of Princess Diana.
Attempting to aid any other person, while trying to save yourself is a difficult resolution to come to, but ensuring your own survival is the best
INTRO Cute, cuddly, loving, puppies! Everyone wants a: Cute, cuddly, loving, puppy!
Where you need some type of protection and realize oh I guess my fists and words are the only protection I need. Apparently that’s what Columbia believes. I also don’t understand when they say “prohibited the carrying of unlicensed handguns or other deadly or dangerous weapons capable of being concealed”. I would understand you getting in trouble for carrying a handgun not registered. A good majority would have their handgun registered , if you let them get it registered.
Well this question is up to the personal opinion of the person being asked. To one person, a life may be sacred and the greatest sin would be to take that away from someone, where to someone else, they might not want to watch someone suffer if they know that they have the ability to help them. Theres no right answer to this question, the only time an answer may be reached is with the majority vote. The world is not perfect and it is impossible for everyone to agree. From my point of view, if is someone is in pain, how could you let them suffer.
Jeremy, Ready I’m going spastic: I really don’t need to drink.. or pot.. I think they calmed me down if anything. I always heard if you type in caps it means you are yelling… I don’t yell much in person because I feel if you want to hear what I have to say listen closely.
Well we are here at Glen Helen Motocross Nationals in San Bernardino California. An it 's a real hot gloomy day out here. The riders are going to have a rough time keeping hydrated and keep in shape for this track. The race isn 't today it 's just a fan based thing today but the riders are looking at the track to see what they 're up for. All the riders want the win here because it means your a champion in this sport.
However, when you are trying to save a life, it is understandable. Specifically, Johnny killed Bob because he was drowning Ponyboy. He was trying to scare the Socs away with the knife, but he accidentally stabbed Bob. Sometimes, when you are in the act of saving someone from death, it might get out of hand and lead to another person’s
Whether you like guns or you hate them, you must understand that the ownership of firearms is a right; A RIGHT…NOT a privilege. You must understand that America is a republic, NOT a democracy. That means that our rights cannot be changed or ended by a vote. ““The Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms.” – Samuel Adams” It is your right (as protected by the first amendment) to oppose the 2nd amendment.
It can lead to death and in that case life is much more important than a person’s
It is a controversial topic as some people argue that it is unnatural - thus unethical. Assuming that all that is against the nature is wrong, would it not mean that saving a person is also unnatural. Inaction in this case would be natural way, therefore ethical thing to do. The practice shows that it is unethical to be inactive when a person is in a danger, otherwise there would not have been a law that punishes for inaction. It does not mean that inaction is wrong, but only it question where the boundaries should lie.
Topic: Surveillance cameras in public places such as malls and streets are a great idea to increase security against criminals and not a breach of privacy. Proposition: Persuade the people to support the use of CCTV in public places which can increase the presence of security in that particular area. Specific Objectives: - To discuss the uses of CCTV specifically on security and crime prevention; - To explain that “lawful” use of CCTV cameras do not violate one’s right to privacy; and - To encourage people to support the use of CCTV in the country. I.
Persuasive Speech Etson Williams Course # 22297787 Topic: Ban smoking in public places Audience: You are speaking to a group of teenagers. There are twenty-five female and male students present in the class. Most of the male and female students are eighteen, nineteen, and older age present in the class. Some of them do smoke and most of them do not.