When people think about college student?s financial status, they often think they are going to be broke from student loans. What most people do think about when it comes to college students is credit card debt. And if people do think about it, the students are often blamed for the debt because many people still think they are you kids who are irresponsible when It came to money. In the article, ?The Credit Card Company Made Me Do It? ? The Credit Card Industry?s Role in Causing Student Debt, author, Carlos Macias, warns his audience that credit card companies will try anything and everything to get students to own a credit card from their company. Macias states that college students have a huge target on their back when it comes to credit …show more content…
Macias?s intended audience is his classmates and his professor, so when he uses his personal experience in the first paragraph, his audience will see how that could easily happen to them since he shares many of the same attributes as his intended audience. His goal is to make the audience feel hostile toward credit card companies. Adding to this idea are words such as, ?bombarded students with highly sophisticated advertising?, and ?disguising the real cost of credit, and ?attack students with mail? (Macias 282). All of those phrases evoke a negative feeling about credit card companies. Macias also does a great job portraying that credit card companies see college students as ?easy targets? (Macias 281). Since the everybody in his audience, besides one person, are college students, he successfully creates a negative image of credit card companies because no student wants to feel naive. He does an excellent job appealing toward the audience?s …show more content…
His message his clear throughout the whole piece and he uses sources to show that he has knowledge on the topic. He also uses many sources and personal experiences that make the reader trust him and believe that he knows what he is talking about. With that being said, he did need to elaborate more when it came to addressing the alternative views about credit card companies. Ultimately, the reader can understand that his message is that credit card companies are to blame for college student debt because of his effective use of pathos, logos and the majority of
Evaluating this article, it is very informative and helpful in helping one who is in debt to individually find a solution. This article, although not focused on the entirety of this social problem, demonstrates a perspective of solution for an individual. Comparing this article with the others, it relates to the article shown above, however; focuses more on how the individual can help their debt rather than how to solve the student debt crisis all throughout
What happens when your son or daughter is a college freshman? “Getting Carded” by David Migoya tells the readers what exactly happens when your children come to college. “More than fifty-eight percent of college students said they saw credit-card marketers on campus for two or more days at the beginning of the semester, and eighty-seven percent of all students say they have a card, according to the U.S. Public Interest Research Group.” Credit cards are not a bad thing, but if used carelessly it can ruin your children’s future. “The worst problems come from overspending or maxing out credit limits—which typically are kept low to start—but from the fees associated with late payments or interest rates.”
The author states that Obama dipped into his daughter’s college savings(par.3). The author is using the rhetorical appeal logos to relate with this claim. The author is still trying to grab the audience attention at this point by persuading them that obama is not to be trusted. Even though there is no proof for this claim, the author supports this claim by stating that the money was spent on the game components and the warehouse space to store the finished products. This claim is partially effective because the author describes obama spending the money on the game which is persuasive to the
In Carlos Macias' essay, "'The Credit Card Made Me do it!'-The Credit Card industry's Role in Causing Student debt", he discusses how credit card companies employ different tactics to put college kids into debt, in order to make money off of them. Macias, being a college kid, attempts to make all other college kids aware of credit card company schemes. Macias puts "most of the blame directly on the credit card companies," (274). I believe that the person with the credit card is to blame for the debt because anyone who has a credit card goes in knowing that they must pay off their bills. However, I find it wrong for credit card companies to approve college kids for a card when they state that they do not have any source of income.
This commercial uses rhetoric elements, such as a well-structured narrative, convincing imagery, and logical argumentation, in order to persuade the audience to believe that Edward Jones is the right company to handle their different types of
Columnist Scott Gilmore brings to light the operations of payday loan companies and the impact that they have on society. Although the payday loan companies seem to take advantage of the financially vulnerable members of society, perhaps the true fault lies within the education of society. A devastatingly large portion of society seeks out payday loans, and the results are appalling. As mentioned by Gilmore in the article, “[A correlation was found] between the number of payday lenders in a neighborhood and premature mortality”. This reveals a lot regarding the repercussions of seeking out loans that in turn create greater loans.
The author uses false statements and fallacious reasoning in the argument “Sidestepping Students Debt”. One example of the author’s false statements is, “Smart students everywhere are refusing to accept the unwritten law that attending college results in overwhelming debt. Instead, these smart students sidestep serious college debt before college even begins.” This is a false statement because it is not only saying that only smart students are the ones sidestepping the debt but, also saying that people with lesser grades will not sidestep their debt. It is false because any kind of student can try and hopefully succeed in sidestepping their debt.
By using personal credibility it could have given them more driving force on their side in which they can relate to the people with debt, which help the reader comprehend that they know what it feels like to be in their
It also demonstrates how advertising can be a seducing and powerful trap (Schechter 358). For the credit card industry, the newest target is the lower class. Steve Barnett, a former credit card company
Thus, it stands to reason that the article’s purpose is to support the argument that predatory lending practices are at fault for the debt young adults experience. Macias uses personal experience immediately peppering in researched data to support his findings and conclusions on how the credit card industry wholeheartedly takes advantage of young America. His article captures the reader’s focus by appealing to pathos and tugging at pity in the reciting of how Macias was taken advantage of by credit lenders. Carlos Macias’s argument for the debt accrued by college aged adults being the fault of the credit card companies themselves roots itself in his rhetoric. From his skillful hooking of the audience with information garnered from personal experience to the utilization of logos throughout the paper presenting itself as careful and reliable research.
Loans allow receiving a college education seem like a smoother process considering that such a hefty amount to pay is divided so that it can be paid for in moderation. Despite the fact that it’s split into many payments, it’s still a large quantity all in all so unless indebted students aim for high income jobs, there would many years of difficulty to come after college. For this reason, undergraduates make it their goal to go after jobs which would prevent them from being constantly pressured to pay off debt. Thus, student debt is both a crisis and a reason to encourage persistence towards greater ambitions (Hillman, 41). It is a tremendous thing when a student seeks to be financially comfortable or even rich in the future but not when it is for the wrong reasons.
This overwhelming amount of pathos in this final line leads one can be a better human being but simply just staying at home can have an obvious impact others. Leonard shows with his depictions of companies’ advertisements that there is a rampant epidemic of hitting lower standards with their stagnant approach each year, regardless of the civil reaction. Additionally, today’s consumers in these companies’ ads provokes the Leonard’s readers to arbitrate the negative significance for what has become of our
Student loan debt loads have been spiraling, doubling over the last decade, and the enrollment rates of young people from lower socio-economic groups are rising far slower than middle and upper groups. Governments must recognize the renewed public investment in post secondary education is an economic and social imperative. 6.7 million borrowers in repayment mode are delinquent (Snider 1). The sad fact is that many lenders aren't exactly incentivized to work with borrowers. Unlike all other forms of debt, student loans can't be discharged in bankruptcy.
Even though this essay lacks in some aspects, the message of the advertisement is so strong that it makes up for what is
Journal #1 After watching this week’s video and reading this week’s article, it has opened my eyes more towards media and how media effects those who view it. Whether it is the message that is shown in the advertisements, or the hidden message that we find on our own, media has a big impact whether we see it or not. The “TED” talk video shows a perfect example of this when, the speaker, Andrea Quijada shows a credit card ad that was rearranged to show what that really meant in the person’s, who rearranged the ad, eyes. I feel that this is a perfect example, because it showed what “5% cash back” really meant. The ad was also changed from a picture of a money flower, to a cooperate like harm grabbing the money.