The receiver may not be paying attention, and may miss important verbal or non-verbal parts of a message. This could impact how the information is interpreted. Even if the receiver attends to all the verbal and non-verbal parts of the message, he or she may still not accurately decode the intended message. Individuals often use their prior knowledge about their partner or situations to help interpret the meaning of a message. This prior knowledge can actually distort the decoding of information if it is based on biases or erroneous assumptions.
To sum it up, stereotypes are almost always incorrect. Appearances don’t show a person’s actions or intentions. Without taking time to get to know someone, their true personality will not show. Also, who a person hangs out with, does not define who they are. For those reasons, stereotypes need to stop.
It would suggest that the reason they are dropping out is because they are not aware of the norms of society. They don’t know that it is frowned upon to drop out and the consequences of doing so or they may just disagree with them. If the problem is that they are not aware of the norms, then the solution to this would be to educate them on the norms. If they disagree with the norms, then convincing them that abiding by the norms is important would work. If you have tried these two things and it still hasn’t worked then they would suggest using Social Pathology
Why do people who observe behaviors hesitate to act on their own or to come forward promptly, even when affected by that behavior? Why do they not immediately report those whom they see to be acting in an intolerable fashion? In real life hesitation is not confined just to bystanders. People in all roles may hesitate to act. The most common reasons for hesitation are: fear of loss of relationships, loss of privacy, fear of unspecified “bad consequences” or retaliation, and insufficient evidence.
While telling the truth out of fear of a lie’s consequences may give the same result but have different moral undertones. For a person to tell the truth because they feel the backlash of people discovering they had lied, and then lose their credibility, makes this an action done out of fear and not duty (Kant 70). Since in order to lie in order to avoid undesirable outcomes a person looks at outside factors and is driven by fear it does not follow Kant’s guidelines and does
Without privacy the members of a community will feel pressured to keep opposing or unique viewpoints to themselves, in fear of being monitored. Privacy eliminates those fears and allows for the free exchange of ideas.
As outsiders, we cannot determine whether an action is selfish or not because the true characteristic of the action depends on the mindset of the performer of the action. Distinguishing selfless and selfish people from one another is complicated, and although people are often subject to prejudice, they can never really know the truth. Overall, people best not judge and label others, for doing so causes conflict. According to George Morgan, Jr., selfishness and unselfishness in general should not be seen as moral or unmoral, for that kind of perspective leads people to become uncooperative and “men to overlook possibilities for sharing common goods” (406). In the end of “Rashomon,” the woodcutter and commoner accuse one another of their selfish actions—the woodcutter of the commoner for stealing the baby’s blankets and the commoner of the woodcutter for stealing the dagger.
Despite the fact that intercultural competence has different terminology when referring to disciple or approach, it can also relate to the debate about global citizenship. Intercultural competence is seen as the capability to develop an objective knowledge, attitude, and skills that prompt visible behavior and communication that are both successful and appropriate in intercultural interaction. In other words, intercultural competence is a range of different skills; cognitive, affective, and behavioral skills that lead to communicate effectively and suitable with different surrounding and culture. Intercultural competence can also be broken down into three constituent elements seen as knowledge, skills, and attitude. (Deardorff, 2006) With that being said, knowledge is my substantial weakness while skills and attitude are my strengths regarding intercultural competence.
Deviance is a term used when a person violates a social normality. Deviance can be minor or they can be extreme. Using public behavior for example, if a person were to walk around without shoes in public, it would be considered odd and deviant behavior. Or if a person invaded someone 's space it would be considered rude and questionable behavior. My reasoning for not breaking social normality is simple: to break a social normality would be considered odd and I would rather not be percieved as such.
Many are often confused on the difference between stereotyping, being prejudice, and discrimination. Being prejudice often includes an unreasonable attitude that is unusually resistant to a rational influence. Discriminating a specific group can include treatment of a person or particular individuals in a way that is worse than the way people are usually treated. As for stereotypes, they are simply cognitions or beliefs. If someone stereotypes another person or group of people, it does not necessarily mean they are prejudice or discriminatory.