The Maurya empire and the ancient African civilization of Ethiopia were both located near major waterways, which played an important role in their prosperity and success. However, they also both had governments which differently affected the way their people lived. Overall, we understand how both Ethiopia and the Maurya empire used their location to their advantage, but both their rulers set up different governments which influenced the lives of their
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
Communications and diplomacy is essential to the success of two societies that come to interact, especially when the peoples are so different as the Pamunkeys and the English colonies of Jamestown were. When societies share knowledge, resources, and goodwill, they build not only a better present but also a stable future. However, when they try to take advantage of each other by force, they bring instability to their people and those around them. A poignant lesson of this is seen in the interactions between the English and the Pamunkey people in the early 17th century.
This led to an arranged system in which they could keep order and keep the civilizations thriving. This was an achievement because African kingdoms were able to understand the need for an organized system that would keep order and control the civilization in which they were in charge of. Without this source of power that kept their empire organized, a missing place of leadership would take over their civilization and result in chaos. Another source of order in the kingdoms came from the common religion of Islam within certain countries. Islam unified the people within the community which allowed for leaders to have an easier control over their ‘subjects’.
Though many Western civilizations have influenced the way we live our lives today, many forget the progressive movements of early Classical and Contemporary Oriental cultures. Two of these cultures that are still revisited by historians today were the epitome of early Asian civilization and very influential guides for cultures to come. Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 A.D.) and Gupta India (320 C.E.-525 C.E.) were two dynasty-based civilizations in the early conception of Southeastern Asian rule. Though both had a very similar class based society and both had to endure outside invasions as well as internal conflicts, they both had unique, and future utilized, ways of maintaining their rule. Both of these cultures needed to keep order and stability within their borders to maintain a prosperous society.
The Empire of Mali was a wealthy and powerful dynasty in africa. During the Empire of Mali they had some of the most powerful leaders,it lasted from 1235 ce - 1600 ce,it was located in west africa near the sahara desert. Mali became a site of cultural exchange because people from different cultures came to mali to exchange salt for gold.one of the effects of the cultural exchange is that people got very rich,another effect is that there were religion changes, the last effect is that universities and schools were built to educate their people. One of the effects of the cultural exchange was that built schools and universities so they could get a education.
The Khina culture is a cultivation based agricultural group in central Africa. Living primarily in the Hamr el Bash mountains, these people rely heavily on growing and cultivating crops. What remains in an archaeological context of this culture is sparse, consisting primarily of various forms pottery and the sherds there of. It is the way that these remains are distributed and are found, the artifacts themselves as well as in relation to one another, that opens the possibility to interpretation of how people lived. Using the dispersion patterns of the artifacts, primarily the pottery, in conjunction with the ethnographic accounts amassed over years of observation of the region and the culture, we are able to interpret how this culture and these
Ancient Mesopotamia and Ancient Egypt were two early human civilizations that lived during the bronze age in harsh desert environments located not far from each other. Both civilizations were built around rivers that they depended on for survival. There is evidence that these rivers had great influence on both the societies politics and culture. Egypt was built around the very strong and reliable Nile River. Ancient Mesopotamia was established in the fertile crescent between the less reliable Tigris and Euphrates Rivers.
The early modern era was a time when empires thrived across the globe. The Western Europeans were not the only ones to construct successful empires either. The Russian, Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman empires added to this phenomenon. Although these empires share many similarities, they also have their differences. During the time, 1450 CE -1750 CE, European empires in the Americas and their Russian, Chinese, Mughal, and Ottoman counterparts are similar in that they all thrived and united diverse peoples and different in that European empires developed something entirely new, an interacting Atlantic World, while the other empires continued older patterns of historical development.
The African civilizations had made some great achievements in fields like trade, medicine, military, trade and their political system. The African society was quite advanced in a couple fields, some of the major fields were politics and trade. According to document 2, “The court of appeal is held in a domed pavilion around which stand ten horses with gold embroidered
The primary difference in the political organization of both East and West African from 1000-1500 CE comes in the form of government. While all sub-Saharan Africa utilized kin-based groups, West Africa was structured more around kingdoms, and East Africa structured around city-states. Some West African kingdoms had a strong centralized government, such as the Kingdom of Kongo. The government included a king, who controlled military, judicial, and financial affairs, with the help of his officials. When the emergence of formal states came about, the strong kin-based societies of the West survived for centuries later.
Therefore, it became densely populated. Also, the Nile was used for trade and transportation, making it one of the most advanced civilizations of time. Egyptians and their way of life were greatly influenced by geography like the Nile River. The civilizations of ancient Egypt and China demonstrated that the influence of geography was pivotal to the rise of these great civilizations and the people who lived there.
The Great Mahele affected all the lands of Hawaii. Hawaiian land redistribution was proposed by King Kamehameha III in the 1830s and enacted in 1848. Because the whites wanted to have Hawaii become more like America, they influenced King Kamehameha III to change from feudal system to a system where people own their own land. This Great Mahele or Land Division causes a lot of political, social, and cultural changes that will be discussed later in this paper. Today, we also see how this Land Division is shown through how we have private ownership of land.
The most significant factor that influenced the development of ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia was their geography, because their locations by large rivers led the civilizations to produce an abundance of food, leading to a population increase and for several cities to form which influenced the cultural, economic, and political influence of both civilizations. The flooding within both ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia allowed their agriculture to thrive Mapping sentence for culture. Mapping sentence for economic. Mapping sentence for Political. Transition.
All three of them shared the standard lifespan of incredible growth, expansion of wealth and resources, and then finally ending. All three of these empires starting from Ghana to Songhai chronology inherited the same trade routes and geopolitical and cultural traditions
There are many different aspects to a civilization that constitute to the place’s overall function and nature. This notion is upheld especially when it comes to Constantinople. The imperial nature of Constantinople allowed it to not only function as an imperial capital, but as a trading emporium as well which in turn lead to other various functions. From the beginning, Constantinople was deemed the new imperial capital for the benefit of the empire. This notion was premeditated as emperor Constantine could see the potential within it especially in regards to maintaining dominance over surrounding powers.