ANTI-DEFECTION LAW AND INDIAN POLITICS
SUBMITTED BY:
RASHI CHOUDHARY (A3211116062)
KARANVIR HOODA (A3211116009)
B.A.LLB(H) SETION ‘A’
CONSTITUTUINAL LAW PROJECT
INTRODUCTION
What does defection means?
Defection has one of the noticeable practices seen in the Indian politics. It has played a very important role in making and unmaking of the governments. Defection means:
• If a member remains absent in the house when asked to by the party leadership to remain present or
• Votes against the instructions of the party or
• Voluntarily leaves the membership of the party is deemed to be defection.
How does parliament regulate itself?
As we all know, parliament is the debating forum.
…show more content…
The law states that the decision is final and not subject to judicial review. The Supreme Court struck down part of this condition. It held that there may not be any judicial intervention until the presiding officer gives his order. However, the final decision is subject to appeal in the High Courts and Supreme Court.
Provisions of the Constitution ( About the Law)
The Tenth Schedule to the Constitution, known as the Anti-Defection Law, introduced by the Constitution (Fifty-second Amendment) Act, 1985 as amended by the Constitution (Ninety-First Amendment) Act, 2003 lays down the conditions regarding disqualification, on ground of defection. The main provisions of the Tenth Schedule are summarized below:—
• An elected member of Parliament or a State Legislature, who has been elected as a candidate set up by a political party and a nominated member of Parliament or a State Legislature who is a member of political party at the time he takes his seat would be disqualified on the ground of defection if he voluntarily gives up his membership of such political party or votes or abstains from voting in the House contrary to any direction of such
…show more content…
This law also provides for certain exceptions:
• Provisions have been made with respect to mergers of political parties. No disqualification would be incurred when a legislature party decides to merge with another party and such decision is supported by not less than two-thirds of its members.
• Special provision has been made to enable a person who has been elected to the office of the Speaker or the Deputy Speaker of the House of People or of the Legislative Assembly of a State or to the office of the Deputy Chairman of the Council of States or the Chairman or the Deputy Chairman of Legislative Council of a State, to sever his connections with his political party without incurring disqualifications.
The question as to whether a member of a House of Parliament or State Legislature has become subject to the disqualification will be determined by the presiding officer of the House; where the question is with reference to the presiding officer himself it will be decided by a member of the House elected by the House on that
The Electoral Commision should altogether be abolished or if the chance came, modified, because of the following reasons,
Through the quote stated it shows us as the readers that they cried for a democratic system! One of the underlying details of a democratic system is that everyone has equal protection under the law. Under the current circumstances the Indians could get away with any actions without having to suffer consequences. The citizens in the council shouldn’t have been allowed to sway their loyalty to where they saw fit. They supported in what was in their best interest and profit.
The 1996 U.S Presidential Election The U.S. Presidential Election of 1996 was the fifty-third quadrennial election. It was held on Tuesday, November 5, 1996. The Democratic nominee was Bill Clinton, and his running mate was Al Gore. The Republican nominee was Bob Dale, who was the former Republican Leader of The U.S. Senate. In 1995, the Republicans were making much progress in the midterm elections.
The Supreme Court case, Brown vs. Board of Education 349 U.S 294, dealt with the segregation of black children into “separate but equal schools.” The Brown vs. Board of Education was not the first case that dealt with the separating of the whites and blacks in schools. This case was actually made up of five separate cases heard in the United States Supreme court concerning the issue of segregation in public schools. Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Briggs v. Elliot, Davis v. Board of Education of Prince Edward County (VA.), Boiling v. Sharpe, and Gebhart v. Ethel were the five cases that made up the Brown case. Thurgood, Marshall, and the National Association for the Advance of Colored People (NCAAP) handled these cases.
Although aligning with a party may seem like the right idea, party affiliation does not account for an individual’s character or the choices that they will make after settling into their position. The party system has misled
The Senate: “The upper chamber of Parliament where there are 105 members who are appointed until age 75 by the Crown on the advice if the prime minister.” (Rules of the Game pg 106)The original Senate that was created in 1867 had only originally 72 seats. It was created to counter balance representation population in the House of Commons, although in recent years the Senate has become to reinforce representation of groups that have often been underrepresented in parliament, examples; Aboriginals, visible minorities and women. There has been a huge debate’s on whether Canada should keep the Senate. The people all over Canada have mixed opinions on if we should keep the Senate or not.
Prorogation is much like a complex acronym to Canadians. We understand that it conveys meaning in some way, yet the majority of us are not familiar with the term. Developed during the Tudor period, prorogation is a healthy alternative to dissolution; however, today prorogation is a process that once approved by the Governor General, the acting Prime Minister may cease the current parliamentary session, effectively clearing the parliamentary agenda and ending proceedings for a set period of time. In recent years there has been a growing controversy in relation to prorogation in Canada. This is largely due to the 2008-2009 parliamentary disputes between the Conservative minority government and the opposition governments; however, that is addressed
In recent years, the U.S. Senate has been embroiled in a countless number of filibusters which have a long history in the U.S. Congress. To supporters of the filibuster, such political procedures play an important role in a democratic society. They believe that the filibuster embodies the spirits of democracy to protect the minority from oppression in the United States. Reformers or skeptics of the filibuster, on the other hand, believe that filibusters sometimes severely hinder the operations of the government. Although people have witnessed many filibusters in history, the number of filibusters in the past few years surprised and infuriated many in America.
Their main role is to provide a final check on the legislation passed in the House of Commons. Some people believe this isn't necissary and that we should not spend so much money on it. Additionally, some people feel that we are alreadt overgoverened in this country. We have municipal governments, urban hamlets, towns and villages, rural municipalities, countries, school boards, hospital boards, provincial governments, the federal House of Commons, and the Senate. Some people think that
Compulsory voting Mandatory or compulsory voting is the practice of making the entire population vote. Political scientists argue about which is preferred, and there are definitely reasons why people support mandatory voting. However, in this day and age, we have moved on beyond the ‘divine right’ of rulers to rule. Voting is the body of democracy, and freedom is soul of voting.
The Court’s effectiveness relies on the institutional capacities as well as the ruling’s popularity. When lower-court judges comply with Supreme Court decisions, rulings can have a substantial effect on social policies, as in the case
The Senate in Canada should be abolished Introduction: Canada senate is a part of legislation institution in Canada, which represents the interests of upper class people. Different from America, it is not produced by election but directly-nominated by the premier and appointed by governor. Senate, governor, and the House of Commons are like three legs of a tripod which constitute the congress and legislation system in Canada. Senate undertakes the responsibility of proposing expostulation to governor and cabinet, which acts the role of supervision and restriction. Senate played critical role when Canada established federal government in 1867, the diversity of senators warrants the smooth convey of popular will to governors and legislators coming from different ethnic group and social status.
The Court held that the statutory scheme constituted a prior restraint and hence was invalid
Ward did breach the duty of loyalty because the duty of loyalty is the duty to put the principal first before others and oneself. During his time working for the principal, Ward came up with a design for the new product he was creating and wanted to get it patent. Ward put himself before the principal, he wanted to make a product that would give him money and none to the principal. He created the design during the time, he worked for the principal and was going to create it after he resigned from Taser. He could have prevented a breach of duty, if he did his job and did not create his product during his time served with the principal.
In other words, all legally organised parliaments have limited powers. The Westminster Parliament has constitutionally limited powers, very much like its American and Malaysian