The rebellion of Upper Canada appeared because it was suited entirely in a framework. While, historians in Lower Canada rarely mentioned same debates in Upper Canada. This book overcomes that intellectual hurdle by emphasizing how in both colonies republican thinkers and their constitution opponents drew from the same ideological inspirations. Reference Jean-François Constant, eds. Liberalism and Hegemony: Debating the Canadian Liberal Revolution.
This act established by Borden’s government was vastly beneficial for Canada due to it being used then, and later (The Canadian Encyclopedia). The War Measures Act was a federal law embraced by the Parliament that gave powers to Canada’s government to keep security, defense, and order during the First World War. The War Measures Act was necessary and important as it did a great job by keeping Canada safe during the hard times and made it stronger as a nation. (The Canadian Encyclopedia) Therefore, it increased Canada’s independence and managed to remove it from being under Britain's control overtime as they were able to make their own decisions within their own grounds. Overall, The War Measures Act was an advantageous law for Canada as it gave them authority which lead to their independence as their own
Canada entered WWI as a colony (an extension of Britain), with one division under a British General. After the war, Canada came out as a superb fighting force under their own command. Their contribution to the war was the important role of the generals, politicians and the first line fighters; the Canadian Corps who received a first-class reputation for their strong formations on the Western Front. Many Canadian participants emerged from the war having accomplished important and difficult things together. Bruce Hutchison, a Canadian journalist, noted Canada gaining independence and strength when he commented, “Canada entered World War I as a colony and came out a nation”.
William Lyon Mackenzie King, a man of glory, forever changed Canada’s constitution during the tumultuous nineteenth century and resolved all difficulties Canada faced on its way to becoming a strong, independent, and autonomous nation. His contributions and sanctions targeted all factors at the time and had interrelated effects on the construction of Canada. Unlike other Canadian politicians, King handled every crisis with thorough planning and achieved promising outcomes from unsolvable problems. It is without a doubt that King was the most influential figure in Canada’s development. His role in the autonomy, economic development, and social stability stands as solid evidence of the pioneering impacts he had on Canada’s advancement.
In Canada, we believe that democracy is the best choice to choose who leads our governments and with voter turnout descending, it seems as though that election results will not always represent what people want in terms of the leader of the government. Canadians, especially young Canadians, seem not to understand the importance of voting and how the results affect their lives. When Canadians decide not to vote, the motivated voters decide what all Canadians will accept as the party who will be the next government in whichever jurisdiction the election took place. With these reasons, I strongly believe that the importance of voting should be more emphasized to Canadians as voter turnout has been descending, it will stimulate stronger participation and interest in political activity and the importance of voting is not understood by the majority of youth in Canada. Voting should be more
Students in Ontario taking English should only study Canadian literature because we are completely swamped by the American culture around us. This is a Canadian tradition because we have always been a “branch plant” of another country starting with
For instance, those in the ruling class had a right of life and death which in essence means they can either have people put to death or allow the individuals to live (Foucault, 2003). Contemporary society has moved away from exercising power through this method and we see this evolution from countries such as Canada who no longer have execution rulings entrenched in their constitution as to punish those who contravene Canadian laws. Such authority the sovereign used as a way to punish has a significant historical background in regards to socio-legal studies because this authority is exactly what the movement of liberalism fought against. This fight ultimately leads
The following quote states, “We had flannelette sheets, like children’s, and army-issue blankets, old ones that still said U.S.” (Atwood, 1985, p. 4) This is a historical allusion by introducing Gilead and its connection to the real world the United States. By choosing, at her time, a powerful country reflects on the author’s thoughts on which country is capable of shifting the power and directing it into a dystopian-like world. It concurs with her background. By being written through a Canadian perspective, the United States would be the most appropriate choice because the country was known for struggling with retaining a stable foundation political and social wise. The most prominent event that put them in the spotlight was the Cold War.
The answers to the above questions have drawn mixed reactions from politicians, scholars and the media. The pro-immigration camp argues that the increased immigration to Canada is good because the policy is helping people around the world and enriching the Canadian society in terms of culture, diversity, cohesion and new skills. The anti-immigrants, on the other hand, argue that the large number of immigrants is destructive and senseless both to the Canadians and the immigrants (Sakamoto). A critical
The confusion regarding the self-motive the contemporary issue of Canadian quest for identity. Canada detains to shape the socio-cultural differences caused by the heterogeneous culture and of the different identities among the regions. Canada results in safeguarding the ethnic culture and generating their distinctive identities. Canada is divided into French Canada and English Canada. The cultural identity of French Canada always overtakes the presence of English Canada.