There shouldn’t be year-round school because it would be hard to find babysitters for younger children for two weeks every six weeks for teachers with young students, and teens would find it hard to get summer jobs. Sure, it offers students frequent breaks, but there still shouldn’t be year round school because of certain predicaments for students and teachers alike. First of all, there shouldn’t be year round school because of teachers constantly having to get babysitters if they
Well for those with difficulty focusing, this is counterproductive. This may lead to behavioral issues, in the classroom which teachers want to avoid. To add on with year-round schooling it has frequent breaks that disrupt family life in both student and teacher. So if a family is planning a getaway, the varied schedule causes major problems in the plan. With that those who are finding it hard to secure child care during the short breaks will find the system difficult to live with.
Finally, schools shouldn’t bring back staring atime because of students after school activities. According to “Should Schools Start Later?” by Junior Scholastic, “A later start, say opponents, also interferes with some teens part time jobs and disrupts after school activities” (Scholastic 21). If schools start later, it would result in messing up everybody 's schedules. It could also result in students being more tired toward the end of the school day because they have no energy, because of the school
Schools are still cutting out electives and still can’t afford some of the basic things that students should have in their learning environment. Lynda Barry in her article The Sanctuary of School talks about how for some kids their school is their safe haven. She shows how valuable extracurricular activities and after school programs are when she says,” Before and after school programs are cut and we are told that public school are not made for baby-sitting children. If parents are neglectful temporarily or permanently, for whatever reason, it’s certainly sad, but their unlucky children must fend for themselves. (Barry 724-725) There are children in our communities that depend on the school to keep them safe and to offer protection when their parents are unable to do that but the schools are
I don’t know about them. What I think is they don’t get support from their parents because they ended up having bad grades in the school so they are scared that their kids might waste their money and ended up dropping the college. About school, I totally disagree with them who said they get more opportunities. I might be wrong and they might be right, but I am talking about my experience. I have changed a lot of schools due to my parent’s job.
I think parenting should have risks and this over-protective parenting style is affecting the children. Children now don 't know how to think for themselves and do things on their own because their parents are always there to baby them. The author of "The Revolution Will Not Be Supervised" absolutely has the right idea when it comes to parenting. If parents took a step back and let their children handle their own problems, the children in today 's world would function totally differently. This article has definitely changed my point of view on parenting, and I hope parents get the opportunity to read this article and actually follow through with changing their
When parents try to hold back their children from taking risks during their developmental years, they lash out and/or become overconfident in their abilities, like McCandless. In Forbes, author Kathy Caprino explains the effects of parents holding their children back from taking risks. She said, “If parents remove risk from children’s lives, we will likely experience high arrogance and low self-esteem in our growing leaders” (forbes.com) This could possibly explain why Chris felt it necessary to go on long journeys with little contact with his family. His few experiences with risk-taking were successful, so he became overconfident in his abilities and did not want people to try and stop him from going on these adventures. So, he cut off contact with his family the first chance he
Victor (1998) writes “kidnapping rumors are metaphors for parental worries about their children 's future in a society which is perceived to be unsafe for children” (p. 52). In the case of the Satanic panic, one concrete negative consequence of this fear about children was that the rumors led to parents to take their kids out of school for a day. Although it was only a day, missing school impacts a child’s education. Ironically, better-educated people were less susceptible to believing the rumors about Satanism, and thus didn’t take their kids out of
Like I said before, a parent might feel responsible that their children is not going to college and feel like it's unacceptable and work maybe 2 jobs to get the money. This is not healthy as it create stress and discomfort in the family. Secondly, the student can stop worrying about how to get extra education. This is probably the most important because the student can start preparing and
Children moving from foster home to foster home does not give them the opportunity to a better life. Continuously moving homes, does not give children the stability and family atmosphere that they should be given. From the start the incubator/ large container, may solve the abortion debate, nonetheless, as it continues throughout the years, it would only raise more problems for these
Attending classes year round would be outrageous. If the students did attend classes year round it would be hard to spend time with family or friends, the students would have no beaks from homework, and wouldn’t get a 10-to 12-week summer break. Having year round classes is crazy, because students would be so bored with the same subjects every day and it would feel like summer is disappearing. The impacts of year round school would probably effect more people. The teachers would get so tired of the kids, that it would lack their ability to teach and for the students to learn.
Should there be year round school United States should not require all public schools attend classes year round. The students will not like it. If United States require year round classes there will be no time for summer vacation, the school funds will cost more, and students will likely not try in academics. If schools require year round classes their will be no time for summer vacation for students and teachers. If students want to go on summer programs or summer camps they cannot go that means that the programs and camps will suffer.
Some people at Webb City High School would be very angry to find out that they will no longer be allowed to participate in extracurricular activities due to their grades. The students who really want to play sports though would get into gear and get their grades up to prove that they deserve to play. What is a School without education? Pointless. Other people in the community believe that the “C rule” is not fair for the people who do not participate in any extracurricular activities because they will not be being punished.
Should school be year round with more breaks to improve education? My opinion is no, I think it’s a bad idea to have school year round. Having year round would have a negative impact on the students, they wouldn’t be able to spend as much time with family, and no time for themselves. Having school year round would have a negative impact on the students. Students stress level would be higher from all the constant work they would have to do, with no breaks would be confused.