However, Euthanasia is also illegal in some countries. It also has people who disagree with this kind of killing. Some people think it is a crime. I agree that Euthanasia is the right ways for patients. There are many reasons why Euthanasia is valid.
Technically, according to the list of ethics listed on the National Institute of Health’s website, there is nothing wrong with creating life from death. Playing god isn’t frowned upon because of religious or moral objections. Instead, it is a feared because of the unintended social consequences that might occur. Victor’s failure to even consider the possibilities, both bad and good, of what his scientific discovery might create clearly violates the code of ethics pertaining to social responsibility. In this case, reviving the dead didn’t promote social welfare or prevent harm.
Many people also believe that physicians assisting someone to commit suicide is the most humane way to pass away compared to other methods in which one commits suicide. With taking this into account, most often the people who are for euthanasia fail to realize that the process to qualify for getting the medication to commit suicide is extremely difficult and there are safeguards put in
A doctor may have to operate even in the absence of consent, to save the life of the patient. It is possible that even with such an intervention, the patient may not survive. Assuming that the doctor is competent and has exercised due care and diligence, the doctor cannot be held responsible for a patient's death, as the doctor has acted in good faith and in the best interest of the patient. Maintaining a good Doctor patient relationship often works better than the best informed consent! The informed consent issue as discussed is very much driven not by the medical procedure or research being done or what could arise from it.
In other words, “In ancient times, scientists made use of animals principally to satisfy anatomical curiosity. Early Greek physician-scientists performed experiments on living animals. Herophilus and Erasistratus, for example, examined sensory nerves, motor nerves, and tendons in order to understand their functional differences”(http://www.medicaldaily.com). The Greek physicians discovery meant something big and changed humans health not only the humans health but had many benefits to others around the world. Many laws have been passed throughout the years that have to due with animal testing.
First of all, hounds are more suitable than tabbys as a pet because they are more loving. A study for ten cats and dogs was conducted by Dr. Paul Zak. He is a scientist in neuroeconomics. He wanted to see which species produced more oxytocin after a playtime session. Consequently, he took two saliva samples on each animal, one before and after some play with their owners.
One of the main arguments is that euthanasia could be an ethical issue and can be seen as assisted murder. Physicians are not forced to provide the euthanasia doses; the physicians who do, have agreed to do so. As well as the patient is asking to die, they are not being killed against their will. Another argument is that medical resources and money will be spent for a patient to kill themselves, when they can just commit suicide on their own free will. More medical resources would be spent on keeping that patient alive, than it would euthanize them.
This being said, you should always have that choice to do what you want with your life. The novel accepts the practice of euthanasia but I think it's wrong and is not sympathetic to take a life of an innocent human being. The choice of living or dying should be up to you and nobody else because you should at least have to right to your own body. In the book the old don't really have the choice they grow old, get put into homes, and then get released. I do not think that this is that the practice of euthanasia is compassionate.
We should have the courage to question our whole social project and remake it, rather than take this final step into darkness" Euthanasia is not harming the human race; it is helping the human race instead. If we just look at the case from different angles, we would probably see how beneficial it is, in this traumatic life. Perhaps life might seem to be hard for us sometimes but there are people out there who really are suffering and desperately need to die. It is the latter prohibitive form that condemns active euthanasia" Although the opponents' statement might be right but in some critical cases, it is does not work. Euthanasia is giving people the rest that they desperately need.
They also should be informed of the probable risks, benefits and consequences of donation; they should be legally competent (usually above 18 years old) and aware of the information; and they should free of any udue coercion. • cells, tissues or organs should not be removed from the body of a living minor or legally incompetent person for the purpose of transplantation other than narrow exceptions allowed under national law. * • Purchasing cells, tissues or organs for transplantation, or their sale by living persons or by the family of deceased persons, should be prohibited except the compensation for the costs of making donations by the donor (including medical expenses and lost earnings for live donors) • Advertising the need for or availability of cells, tissues or organs should prohibited if it is intended to offering or seeking payment to individuals for their cells, tissues or organs, or, to the next of kin for deceased persons or any third parties . • Physicians and other health professionals are not allowed to perform the transplantation procedures, and health insurers not cover such procedures, if the cells, tissues or organs concerned have been obtained through exploitation or coercion of, or payment to, the donor or the next of kin of a deceased
However, they do believe that when a person is dying it is acceptable to forgo extraordinary therapies, treatments if it is okay with the family members. They should not feel obligated to extend their life by means that are unreasonable to them. The Buddhist religion also oppose to physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia they are taught to have a great respect for life. However, they believe that life does not have to be preserved at all times especially if a person is dying. Meaning that if a terminally ill person wants to refuse treatment at any time they could do so.