Walter Payon Argumentative Essay

593 Words3 Pages

Walter Payton, former Bears running back, had died from a form of liver cancer. Even though his doctors were very optimistic about his condition in the past, he still died from primary sclerosing cholangitis. Per the Baltimore Sun, primary sclerosing cholangitis is an autoimmune disorder in which the immune system attacks its own tissues and scars the bile ducts. His physicians couldn’t believe that the problems he had from the liver disease would quickly kill a man with his physical abilities. Doctors at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., diagnosed Payton with a side effect that caused his ducts to drain bile from his liver. Once the cancer set in doctors couldn’t do much to save him. Everyone assumes that since Walter Payton is a Hall of Famer that he would get moved up the recipients list, but the government offers everyone an equal opportunity. No one is above one another. The government also placed a price ceiling on the amount of money needed to pay for an organ. The price ceiling indicates that the government sets a legal limit on how high the price of an organ can be. This way people who are less fortunate can afford necessary transplants. One reason that organ donations have more pros than cons is because one organ can save up to eight lives. …show more content…

If someone needs an organ, then they should receive it. Everyone deserves to live. It doesn’t matter about race or religion. If you could save a person’s life without complicating yours, then you should do it. It makes no sense that someone would allow another human being to die because of the color of their skin. But not everyone can become an organ donor, so the choice isn’t always available. The fact that one of your organs can save up to eight lives is amazing, which is a reason that most people become organ donors. Some people are good Samaritans and they want to help others. On the other hand, some people do not care about the well-being of

Open Document