NSA Surveillance Pros And Cons

There is a constant threat to the United States and its citizens in the form of terrorism. Taking the proper steps is crucial to ensure the Homeland stays protected as well as the people that rightfully live in it. There are still many terrorist organizations that have explicitly spoken and wrote about having their ultimate goal to inflict terrorism on the United States. These organizations are being constantly monitored with professionals and counterterrorism agencies. The National Counterterrorism center is one of the leading agencies in gathering intelligence and reporting on potential terrorism activity.

Constitution C.S.A Final Essay The government we use is a Democracy government , this means we elect representatives to form a governing body. We adopted this type of government because we came up with a Constitution. The Constitution is a list of rules our nation was built on and protects us as an individual. The constitution is being violated by NSA spying.

Surveillance and privacy are two terms that don’t match so much. Nowadays our society is made up of people who fond of showing themselves off in any occasion, in a gamut of ways, from social networks such as Facebook, Twitter, and the most recent Instragram, to wearing nothing at all in order to look amazingly cool and “way-to-go people”. I’m not buttoned-down, absolutely, and I don’t want people to bundle up. It’s no use.

Has anybody searched through your phone? How did it feel? Well, thanks to the NSA that happens every day. Every day NSA spies through your phone looking at all your personal data. Invading your privacy.

Democracy and surveillance are contradictory. While the first attracts, the second repels. Democracy signifies all that is laudable and reassuring about governance; surveillance is regarded as a sinister force that threatens personal liberties. Surveillance is often a violation of privacy and has been opposed by civil liberty groups and activists. Liberal democracies have laws that restrict the governments’ use of surveillance, usually restricted to circumstances where public safety is endangered.

The First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. " To most of us, that means that we have the right to freedom of speech, to be able to practice any religion, right to petition, freedom of assembly and press. There are different aspects that should be considered when trying to figure out if the government should have the control to view our activity online. Invading someone 's privacy is a definite way to see who they really are behind closed doors and what activities that engage in, legal or illegal. Truthfully, if you have nothing to hide then the government looking at your online activity or into your cell phone shouldn 't be a problem.

America was at it’s most vulnerable point after the devastating attacks on September 11, 2001 when about 3,000 American lives were lost, and America’s security weaknesses were exploited, sending the country into a major state of fear. In response to the newly discovered security weaknesses, the US government created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Supporters of DHS, believe that the creation and implementation of the new department has made America safer than before the attacks on 9/11. On the other hand, American’s who deny the impact of DHS, don't feel any safer now.

1. “Security, in a broader definition of the term, is considered as against unwanted foreign intrusion: defence of physical and psychological security, of economic interests of language and cultures” (Wallace, 2002). 2. Security also define as ‘a low probability of damage to acquired values’ broadens the minimal and problematic realist identification with survival by specifying the values meant to be protected when this latter is assured (Baldwin, 1997). 3.

“Once you’ve lost your privacy, you realize you’ve lost an extremely valuable thing” - Billy Graham. “Invasion of privacy is a legal term. It is used to describe a circumstance where an individual or organization knowingly intrudes upon a person. The intrusion occurs when the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, such as in a bathroom or locker room”(Winston). There are many factors that help with the loss of privacy these days.

The movie “Citizenfour” is an American documentary filmed by Laura Poitras, and it’s about the uncovering of the corrupt American system that spies on its citizens, supposedely since the attacks of September 11. With the help of the famous technician Edward Snowden, a journalist (Glenn Greenwald ) and a reporter from The Guardian (Ewen MacAskill) they go public, even if it’s a suicide mission. The film starts when she receives an odd message from an anonymous source, who was Mr. Snowden at the time. In the encrypted messages he renders her with inside information from various intelligence agencies, among them the US National Security Agency. When I first saw the movie in ICT class, I legit thought it was a joke, I even wrote down

Is giving the government the ability to watch over the American people twenty four seven a safety-improving idea, or a step in the wrong direction? Would the people be safer under surveillance, or in more danger? There are risks and rewards to surveillance, and it must be understood which outweighs the other, and whether or not it will benefit our country in the long term. Surveillance may work at first, but as soon as it gets into the wrong hands, America will regret its decision. Surveillance would do more harm than good to the American people, and it would tear our country apart.