The greatest moment of time during the presidency of Nixon was the Apollo 11 lunar landing. Neil Armstrong the first man to ever take a step on moon said these words as he took the first steps, “That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.” In all four of the Apollo 11 sources each one appeals to a literary device, ethos, pathos and logos.
In source A written by an anonymous writer of The Times speaks about the lunar landing to tell those who missed what happened. This source appeals to ethos and pathos because the credibility of the facts and the feeling after the announcement that Armstrong has taken the first steps. It talks about what Armstrong does while he is on the moon, “Armstrong then spent the next few minutes taking
…show more content…
The purpose of the speech was to mourn if anything would have happened to the astronauts. The source appeals to pathos because of the emotion that the audience and the speaker feel when it is being given. For example, President Nixon would have said “They will be mourned by their families and friends; they will be mourned by their nation; they will be mourned by the people of the world; they will be mourned by Mother Earth that dared send two of her sons into the unknown”. The audience begins to feel mournful for what has happened. This source also has a connection to source A, they are both appealed to pathos. One has the emotion of unhappiness and the other is happiness. The text is very effective in achieving its purpose because of all of the emotion that is put into it. The emotion of the speech shows that the text appeals to …show more content…
The purpose was put the philosophy of objectivism out into the world. Rand’s commentary appeals to logos because of her rational ideas towards the launch and the landing. It appeals to logos because of her idea that the Apollo 11 wasn’t political. She states that it isn’t political in her commentary, “The fundamental significance of Apollo 11’s triumph is not political; it is philosophical; specifically, moral-epistemological”. In her opinion the Apollo 11 success wasn’t a political statement it was a philosophical one. She later backs it up with reasoning and logic later in her commentary. This article has a connection with source A because of the opinions in the end of the source. The source is very effective in achieving its goal to show her opinion on the Apollo 11. The logic and rational ideas in the text show the appeal to logos in Rand’s
The speaker Ayn Rand, was incredibly passionate throughout the entire commentary. She addresses the fundamental significance of Apollo 11, stating that it is not political; it is philosophical. The audience for this particular situation would be anyone who enjoys commentaries. This publication was created by Rand, for the sole purpose of putting forward her philosophy of objectivism. The subject of this commentary was to talk about mankind itself, and how Apollo 11 completely redefined what it means to be a human.
Neil Armstrong’s famous line,”That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind” caused more than just excitement, the famous line created disbelief of the occurrence. After Armstrong planted the American Flag into the surface, the President was quick to receive the astronauts call and speak about what was happening. The planting of the flag was a symbolic moment for not only the United States, but for all of mankind because of the significance of the mission. Doors to space exploration were opened for the future the second their feet touched the lunar surface. Stanley Cubrick, a famous film making personnel from the 60's, was brought into the attention of many.
Rhetoric is prevalent in everyday sights; from a billboard to a television commercial, the literary skill is used to influence the intended audience. Rhetoric has been important and influential in literature throughout history. Due to the historic event of the first man landing on the moon, many articles and cartoons filled with pride and excitement while others had more of a negative tone were published. Regardless of their tone, the rhetoric was present and necessary in all of the published items; whether the publications were successful is another story. The rhetoric, in the article by Ayn Rand and cartoon by Herblock, will be analyzed for their how the speaker, audience, and subject impacts the text, the appeal to ethos, logos and pathos,
All of this text has a strong and powerful pathos and it's done by sharing the values that the speaker and the audience both have. The text powerful as it is, it wouldn’t be as strong if it wasn’t said by President Nixon. The usage of pathos made the entire text of making the readers react if the mission wasn’t successful was a perfect answer for the people. President Nixon who said this gave the world an inspiring answer and William didn’t hesitate on writing about this for it was truly a shockingly amazing speech he recreated the feeling that Nixon was hoping to get because he didn’t want our nation to suffer and instead to celebrate how they died for a great cause. Williams emphasizes key points that Nixon gave out by using the rhetorical
The 1969 Apollo 11 mission garnered global attention in allowing man to take the first steps on the moon. With such a feat came worldwide responses from popular magazines and authors, each commending the event to an extent. The series of responses begins with a collection of articles from the well known Times magazine, each addressing the moon landing differently; one on the moon, one describing the process of landing, and the last one noting its global impact through renowned leaders. Following the Times articles is Ayn Rand’s The July 16.1969, Launch: A Symbol of Man’s Greatness article in which she narrates the launch, emphasizing man’s potential.
The first humans on the moon captivated and put many in shock while they watch it on their televisions all around the world. President Kennedy’s goal transpired as the moon landing took place on July 20th, 1969. Before the moon landing planning, President Kennedy wanted the nation to commit in space developments because the United States trailed after Soviet Union. In many articles relating to the Apollo 11 event, the sources informed their audience using rhetoric (logos, pathos, ethos) and very detailed. Furthermore, the overall man on the moon event has multiple points of views on importance and greatness, although the event shows worthlessness.
My topic is about “John F. Kennedy’s Moon Speech”. The speech was given by the John F. Kennedy at May 25 1961 after the astronomy landed on the moon and returned to the Earth safely. This event is one of the most important events in the astronomic history. It was the first time that people truly landed and walked on the moon. This landing event did have a great influence in the history and politics.
Throughout the speech the emotional appeal of pathos is redundant. The speech was given in front of American flags and President Trump presents himself as being powerful bringing more emotion into the speech. This makes the pathos appeal successful, By President Trump using past and current American tragedies and problems, he captures the pathos aspect by bringing death, and terror into the speech. In this case, the audience will accept the emotional appeal for the fact that the casualties and terror in American society will continue if he wasn’t elected are included. Terror in the America tends to be a soft spot for many because it means lack of safety, for those in our country.
Former President of the United States, Ronald Reagan, in his address to the nation about the Challenger explosion, distinguishes the terrifying news of the explosion of the space shuttle. Reagan's purpose is to remember the lives lost in this painful accident and to ensure that space program will keep our faith with its future in space. He adopts a sorrowful tone in order to acknowledge all the courage and breakers that those seven astronauts expressed to his nation. Reagan opens his tribute to the Challenger astronauts by recognizing that this accident delayed his State of the Union address and by showing the pain of him and his wife’s grief. He appeal to the emotions of the listeners by expressing that “today is a day for mourning and remembering” (Reagan, 1986), that he and his wife are “pained to the core” (Reagan, 1986), and that we all know that this accident is “truly a national loss” (Reagan, 1986).
Did you know the Apollo 13 was a ‘’successful failing’’ mission? I’ll explain 3 reasons why it is a successful but failing mission. Apollo 13 was one of NASA’s many missions to the moon, the three astronauts that were on the mission faced many challenges, but they came home safely. To begin, the Apollo 13 mission was one of NASA”s many missions to the moon.
As well, figurative language in his speech showed the passion and bravery the astronauts had. “As they prepared for the journey and waved goodbye and ‘slipped the surly bonds of earth’ to ‘touch the face of god’” (8). His use of personification justifies to all citizens that the journey that turned into a disaster was not their last. It was only the beginning for them.
His inclusion of analogies and emotional appeals, combined with his strong sense of authority, brings his arguments into focus and gives them a punch. His power in delivering this speech quite possibly kept America looking towards the stars and propelled them into the next age of space exploration. President Reagan’s speech serves as a touching conclusion to a tragic event. Despite the terrible catastrophe, Reagan’s four-minute speech provided closure on the one-minute tragedy whose impact will be felt for
His use of pathos evokes emotions of sadness. He makes a statement towards the families of the astronauts: “But we feel the loss, and we’re thinking about you so very much” (Reagan 3). He then makes an effort to comfort the audience
The objective of the publication is to spread objectivism, which is a philosophy about rational individualism. Rand made commentary as a first hand experienced person watching the launch of Apollo 11. One of her appeals to make her article effective is making her commentary very detailed to keep her article interesting. For instance, Rand starts off by saying, “[the launch] began with a large patch of bright, yellow-orange flame shooting sideways from under the base of the rocket. It looked like a normal kind of flame and I felt an instant’s shock of anxiety, as if this were a building on fire.”
And perhaps we’ve forgotten the courage it took for the crew of the shuttle; but they, the Challenger Seven, were aware of the dangers, but overcame them and did their jobs brilliantly” (Reagan). While alluding to the horrific incident aboard Apollo 1, he makes certain of the fact that the families of the victims and citizens everywhere are aware of their bravery in this worst-case scenario that catastrophically played out on live television. He praises the bravery of the victims to not only carry their names on in virtue, but to also announce to the public that they did their jobs as well as they possibly could have in their horrendous situation. He is trying to paint a picture in the minds of the audience of bravery and comfort their worries of last second