Hello Ms. Bahorich, I am a current student at the University of Texas at Arlington and I believe that there is an injustice in the education system in Texas. I believe that the way it’s funded gives a disadvantages to students that attend a school located in a low income neighborhood over schools located in a rich neighborhood. Personally, I admire you for being on the Texas Board of Education as the chairperson, because your job is more than just leading meetings over the Texas education system, giving ideas on how to improve the education system, or make sure that school districts are regulated according to standards. Your job goes beyond that; the future of Texas students is in your hands. Texas education has greatly improved since the beginning …show more content…
Texas Ten Percent plan purpose is to maintain diversity in its most-competitive public universities in a race-neutral way (Daugherty, Martorell, and McFarlin). The way this program works is by automatically accepting anyone who attended a public high school in the state of Texas and graduated within the top ten percent of their class. Although what this programs was meant to help disadvantaged minorities or low income students, it ends up hurting not only students that attended a low performing high school by admitting them in an university for which they’re not qualified for, but they also “take spots from better-qualified students who are not admitted under the TTP Plan” (Daughtery, Martorell, and McFarlin Jr.) Giving students who attended a competitive high school a disadvantage to get accepted in a flagship university. However, the main issue on the education issue is not about what race is getting the better education, but how the system is funded. Unfortunately, everything is based on money now days, the more money a school has, the better their technological equipment is, they can buy new books for every student, or even their school programs are better. I know this because I went to a high …show more content…
The public education system in Texas is mostly funded at the local, then the state, and finally at the federal level. In the school year of 2013-2014, public school districts were funded 56.4% at the local level, 32.9% at state level, and 9.0% at the federal level (FAST - Public Education Funding In Texas). This means that more than half of the public education funding comes from the local level which includes the property taxes, therefore there is an unequal funding within school districts from different cities. As I mentioned before, the state of Texas fails to distribute the money equally within schools, but why? Well there is two answers to this issue. The first one is that wealthy school districts have found a loophole in the Robin Hood plan. Although, the wealthy school districts still send money to the state to support poor school districts. They spend some of that money in interest and sinking taxes, which is a tax used to cover new construction, acquisition and equipment for the schools (Michels). However, some wealthy school districts have overstretched the limits of this tax. A great school district example of this would be Eanes ISD which “bought iPads for its high school students with bond money” (Michels). This is just insane. How is it possible that we are letting this happening while other poor school districts, such as the one I
One option, Policy A, would be to create a 0.25% increase in the state income tax for Oklahomans so public schools would receive pay raises to bring them to a similar level of surrounding states. This would keep teachers from leaving for surrounding states because of pay. They would be able to attract more qualified individuals into teaching because they will receive a better salary than they would have otherwise. This policy would be a taxation policy because it is increasing taxes to increase the pay of teachers in public schools.
The San Antonio Independent School District acting on behalf of students whose families reside in poor districts, challenged the funding by arguing that underprivileged students schools lacked the property tax base that other districts
The Robin Hood Plan required wealthier school districts forward property taxes to the state so these could be reallocated to poorer school districts, like the one Mrs. Richards was educated
Texas is an immense state itself, with problems left and right and not a solution to many of them. The city of Brownsville is often forgotten and not given much attention when it comes to economic issues regarding the education level. Education in Brownsville might not be superior to other schools in the North because they an advantageous education system considering their rich economy. The BISD (Brownsville Independent School District) school organization is often criticized on the criteria of the low economic status the people of Brownsville obtain.
These results should not be surprising. When the goal is to reduce property taxes, there is a good chance politicians will decrease taxes and school funding overall as adding offsetting taxes would seem at cross-purposes with the reduction in property taxes. However, when the goal is to increase equality and help all students succeed, politicians will seek out additional funds to support schools currently near the bottom. At the least, they won’t reduce overall funding in support of equality. Moreover, almost 25 years after reform, Michigan schools are still funded unequally (and won’t be equal for another 20 years at the current rate).
For low-income families who would otherwise not be able to afford to put their child through a private education, proponents argue that this is about the “freedom to choose for your family and your child”.[5] There have been several positive results from the use of tax credits in vouchers in places like Milwaukee, Florida and even Sweden, but due to the rigid resistance to progressive reforms in Texas, we have not been as successful in adopting these new
In his State of the State address, Texas Governor Greg Abbott stated that our state’s economy is greater than that of Australia, Canada, and even Russia. Nevertheless, according to The Texas Tribune, Texas ranks last in school spending per student. This legislative session, the focus on school finance has shifted to “school choice” legislation that would allow students to attend charter or private schools through government money via vouchers. Many of those who support charter schools claim that charter schools are better based on math and reading assessment scores. However, such conclusions fail to take into consideration the demographics of students attending charter schools as opposed to those of public schools.
This data along with data from other cities such as Chicago where only 0.1% of teachers between 2005 and 2008 were dismissed for performance-related circumstances, proves that in the united stated the public school system is broken and in need of help as stated in “Waiting for
Donors are donating money to charter schools, and those donors are linked to the government through political campaigns. All this money for charter schools is unfair to public schools, as they usually have more kids than charter schools thus they need more money. Public schools also have more teachers than charter schools, but they receive less money than charter school teachers because all the government funding is going towards charter
Basing school funding on property tax leads to unequal opportunities and environments for students, even though the government may claim it is not up to them, there needs to be a drastic change. Currently, taxes collected from the surrounding communities fund public school districts. Public schools get financed mainly by the property tax of the surrounding houses. “Resources available to school districts relied heavily on local property wealth, and property wealth per pupil varied greatly, as it continues today”
The article states, “...as long as a top-quality education remains a privilege of the rich, social inequalities will grow. ‘The public school system has largely been abandoned by middle-class white people,’ he says. ‘The question is, will aging Anglos be willing to pay to educate poor Latinos? If not, it’s hard to envision a prosperous future for Houston’”. One politician in Houston aims to focus on equal education for all.
Local governments were hurt mightily, since property taxes went to local governments to fund education (Christensen 115). Special Districts proliferated within the state, which could tax or charge autonomously from the state. Because of the lucrative real estate, the state is forfeiting a major source of revenue, so to counteract that, we have the highest personal income tax and one of the highest sales tax within the nation. The state uses this capital to fund more services typically reserved for local governments Another flaw with Prop. 13 is best explained through the neighbor analogy. A couple has lived in a suburban home for several decades, and its assessed value is $100,000.
In the state of Texas, there are a few reforms that are yet to be passed yet and some that have already been established. These reforms can either cause a positive or negative impact on our society. According to an TexasTribune.org, a certain reform was discussed to be put into action in the near future. The reform consisted of putting $351 million into public school to help the lack small struggling, rural school with kids in special need and to also put $212 million into health insurance programs for retired
Finally, the school board is worried that this funding and jobs from this program will take away from other school district. This is a non-starter; it was stated that the funding would be private funding. So therefore, the school district can’t rob Peter to pay Paul, they should see this funding as a gift
School funding is also based on the school population size. Why should newer schools with high income students get to have a lot more resources then the other schools with low income students. Why is it that lower income schools aren’t given the same resources to help the students? These students with low income do have the same opportunity as the higher income new schools. A lot of those students don’t have access to internet or even have a ride for transportation.