Argumentative Paper Athletes are overpaid Have you ever heard about a grown man complaining about how he could not afford his insurance for his 8 cars? Almost all athletes get paid enormous paychecks and are financially unprepared. Athletes are overpaid because they can go bankrupt and some of the athletes become too confident with their money. Most athletes go bankrupt in a short amount of time. While it might be true that these multi-millionaire athletes have endless amounts of money.
Discovered on March 16, 1906 the National Collegiate Association was a discussion group and rules-making body (Berkowitz). The NCAA brings in an annual revenue of 912 million, making it one of the most popular athletic associations in the world (Berkowitz). Since the NCAA generates nearly a billion dollars the discussion of whether athletes should earn an annual salary for their dedication towards their sport arose. There has been a multitude of pros and cons towards this discussion, but the NCAA granted the law that collegiate athletes will not earn an annual salary. Collegiate athletes shouldn’t be paid.
Persuasive Argument National Athletes are/are not Paid Too Much The topic, pro athletes are/are not getting paid too much, is a heated argument between people. Have you ever thought about it? Well, an answer that I’m sure would be agreed with is that national athletes are paid way too much money. Some people might say that they deserve what they get, but there really isn’t any supportive reasons for that.
Now that would seem to be better than getting paid in some people's perspectives. Even though Posnanski is aware of the benefits the student-athletes are already getting yet he still finds a way to include this thought provoking statement, Posnanski says “The biggest argument for paying the athletes comes down to this: college players (those stars especially) are the reason why these schools are generating so much money and so they deserve a much bigger piece of the pie. These sports are about them”. Each college sports ( focusing on football and men's basketball ) earn around 50 million dollars a year.
Persuasive Argument National Athletes are/are not Paid Too Much The topic, pro athletes are/are not paid too much, is a heated argument between people. Have you ever thought about it? Well, an answer that I’m sure would be agreed with is that national athletes are paid way too much money. Some people might say that they deserve what they get, but there really isn’t any supportive reasons for that.
Have you ever thought why college athletes should get paid? Paying them in college might help them later in life. Paying them will help them save up their money on stuff they need later in life. Paying the athletes will help benefit them and the college and organization. I think college athletes should get paid cause because the college makes money off of them. And most of them work hard in practice and play great in the game. Colleges should help their athletes by paying them.
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule.
Athletes - Paid for Their Worth Most people think that athletes are overpaid and see huge contracts come out every year. It’s not everyday that an athlete wakes up to a 20 million dollar contract. In fact, they actually worked for it over many years of training and dedication. Pro athletes are paid exactly what they deserve because they work hard and sacrifice more than most people think. It's not just businesses paying them; people do things like buy merchandise, tickets to the games and support their favorite teams while the athlete does the “dirty” work of performing.
Why are people so worried about how much money a professional athlete makes? So many people are worried about how much money a professional athlete make, they say why doesn’t it go two someone in need or why don’t teachers make more money, they are teaching our future generation. Yes teachers may be teaching owner future, and yes there are servicemen putting their lives on the line, but these athletes aren’t regular athletes. Professional athletes have trained and sacrificed ever since they were little kids play youth sports to become who they are today. These athletes sacrifice their body’s day in and day out, they sacrifice time in the gym or on the field day in and day out instead of being with their families. A lot of people assume that athletes spend all their money on clothing, cars, and wasteful stuff, but that cannot be said for all athletes. “Professional athletes are paid to give audiences excitement” Jamal E.M. Cummins”, but sometimes this excitement comes at a price. Many athletes give money to charity and back to their community’s, some athletes even take time out of their busy day to go and visit sick children n hospitable.
There could be a policeman with an entire family, and an athlete will make more than them in one paycheck, while that family is making significantly less in 10 years. These reasons prove that more important jobs deserve to get paid more than athletes. Now. some athletes spend their money responsibly.
Have you ever thought about about how much time and effort college athletes put into their sport? They spend the majority of their four years in college training for a certain sport. All the time and effort the athletes put in yet they do not receive a penny. Most of these young men and women have moved out of their parents house and have to fend for themselves. College athletes should be paid because college athletes put up the same injury risks as professional athletes, the players bring in money, it could increase motivation for education, and the sport acts as a full time job.
Article Critique Paper Taylor Thissen Minnesota State University, Mankato After reading this peer reviewed journal article, I got a great understanding on what pay for play actually is. In this short article, the research that is being addressed is determining whether National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletes should be getting paid to play their respected sport. It is clear that there is really no simple way in to clearing this problem up. It is a question that seems to arise twice a year. Every March when the NCAA’s March Madness arrives, and as well when the NCAA football season starts.
Not all athletes are superstars ”the researchers argue, schools should compensate student-athletes according to the value they provide the university” (Entman). The star athlete at college universities should be paid slightly more than the average players. For the players that are not star athletes yet they won’t receive too much less than the star athletes, but the higher talented athletes deserve to be noticed a little more than the
It's a controversial topic, whether college athlete be paid or not. College athletes should not be paid. Their scholarships are payment enough, paying them could make the public lose interest in college sports and they earn way more than someone with just a high school diploma. If they were paid, it seems like they'd be benefiting too much.