College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

"Over the last decade, the debate of whether or not college athletes should be paid has intensified, and many athletes, as well as coaches, have begun to advocate for the cause." (TIMES) Tyler Harnett, a writer at the Huffington Post, took his standpoint on the topic in the article "Why College Athletes Should be Paid," which clearly states his claim, college athletes should be paid. Personally, I disagree with Harnett's viewpoint and I don't believe college athletes should be paid due to education, funding, and overall fairness.

The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid. Although college athletes may be on a scholarship that is paying for their education, they also work countless hours on their craft and make millions for their

College sports are the building block for all future athletes and superstars. According to a survey conducted by Harris Interactive, around 45 percent of the U.S. Americans follow college sports. If college athletes were getting paid they may stay in school longer, and these student-athletes spend about 43.3 hours per week to their sports, which is like having a full-time job. After dedicating most of their time to their physically demanding athletics and mentally challenging academics, college athletes should be compensated for their talents.

College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities. With this article having a very strong analysis evidence such as the appeals to logos, pathos, and ethos. I agree that this article is very effective. Throughout this essay, I will analyze the article through its context of rhetorical analysis and evaluation of argument claims, and logos, pathos, and ethos.

One compelling reason why college athletes should not be paid is because college athletes are often given scholarships. Some people may be aware enough to realize that student athletes on athletic scholarships are already being paid. According to the author of Forbes, Pay College Athletes , it states, “Certainly not all student athletes are on scholarships and not all are on full scholarships but the student athletes in the revenue sports are receiving compensation in the form of educational benefits and living expenses.” This evidence means that college athletes on athletic scholarships already receive many paid expenses. Free tuition, room, meal plans and money for books and extra expenses are some things that are covered by athletic scholarships.

College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day. They play their hearts out every single night, and will do whatever it takes to get the win. If someone sacrifices his body for the better good of a team, then they should be treated like professionals would if they had done the same thing. Which is paying them some portion of the money that they just made for you. In his article "Should college athletes be paid to play?", Marc Edelman states, "Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. These revenues come from numerous sources, including ticket sales, sponsorship, and the sale of broadcast rights." This quote proves that the students are bringing in lots of money and the school has plenty to give. College athletes should be paid because they contribute to the school revenues.

College athletes spend just as much, or more time at practice, games, and traveling, as they do in the classrooms studying. This issue is very common in the NCAA. There 's been former players suing the NCAA for not getting payed. They’ve been put on video games, clothes, and on magazines, but they don’t get a penny for it. CBS nearly pays the NCAA $530 million dollars to televise the NCAA basketball tournament every March. The NCAA makes the money with them being on the video games. Today as much money that flows in and out of sports. Some people think that college athletes should get some of the payment, and others do not.

Collegiate athletes bring in so much revenue and money to the universities and do not get

A growing debate in the National Collegiate Athletic Association is whether or not student athletes should be paid. The controversy began in 2011 after three hundred coaches and athletes signed a petition to pay college-level athletes, and since then other athletes have made several more arguments. The NCAA has rightfully denied all of the requests, saying they include too much. To pay student athletes could be hugely expensive for colleges, especially because they would not only pay for each athlete’s degree and equipment, but also provide a salary and give bonuses revenue for tournaments. Moreover, college athletes should not be paid because there is not enough money, it takes away a student’s focus from schoolwork, and not every athlete is guaranteed a professional career after graduating; however it is argued that it they are already paid in a way.

If college athletes were getting paid, more than likely other students would have to pay more in tuition and in other fees. Athletes getting paid would create the misunderstanding that getting an education would be less important than trying to get involved in a sport. The importance of academics would go straight down the drain. Along with all of these points, the majority of college athletes already technically get paid through scholarship money. So where is the need to pay them more money than what it is worth to get a college

Student athletes should not get paid because the full-ride scholarships that usually pay for you to go to the university pays for your entire education at the university. Jason Whitlock wrote about college athletes not being paid on Gale Opposing Viewpoints. “We need to stress to them that the educational opportunity they have been afforded is more valuable than the ‘pocket money’ an Ed Martin can provide.” Also, if the player is good enough they could be drafted or go professionally to a pro team in whatever sport that they are decent in. Then again, if we pay these collegiate athletes while receiving scholarship money, “the NCAA admits that a ‘full scholarship’ does not cover the basic necessities for a student-athlete. The NCAA refuses to change its rules to allow schools to provide scholarships that equal costs” (NCPA). Most of those necessities are food, transportation, and living expenses (rent, clothes, and school

However, some people think college athletes should not be paid for many reasons such as, college athletes already receive numerous benefits. Many get scholarships, which help pay for their tuition, books ,dorms, and sporting equipment. According to the NCAA, college athletes often receive grants worth up to 100,000 dollars. They are the first choice for professional leagues, which draft college athletes at a higher rate than overseas or minor leagues. Also they might argue, college athletes should be considered students first, because by receiving direct payment, they would basically be employees or professionals rather than students. College athletes may forget that their main purpose at school is to learn and study, not to receive money. Finally, if you pay college athletes it would take money away from college budgets that could be used to invest in research, to hire better staff, or to renovate facilities and technology. If colleges are going to invest more money in a program, it should be in academics,

Over recent years a question that has been of popular discussion is, should college athletes get paid? Throughout the past few decades college sports have become as popular as professional sports in America. As of right now college athletes do not get paid although many people believe that they should. The NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) brings in an average of six billion dollars annually, which is because of the athletes so why should they not get paid? College athletes promote the school they attend by playing, and with all the money they bring to the school there is no reason they should not get some type of compensation.

A prominent issue in today’s society is the question of whether or not student athletes should be paid. Many people today are pushing toward payment for these student athletes, who are required to fill the roles of being both a full time student and athlete. Those who are against the payment of student athletes believe that pay could distort their ideals, diminish their passion for the game, and be detrimental for their general well-being. There is a fear that paying student athletes would make the difference between college athletics and professional sports undistinguishable. Many athletes might miss out on valuable and important lessons learned while being a student athlete if they are constantly faced with the pressure to generate money