Some of the athletes get hurt and they are out for the year because they can 't pay for the injury, but if they get paid it will help them pay for their injuries. Some athletes don 't have enough money for sports gear, so buy paying them they will be able to get sports gear. Most athletes try to play a sport and have a job so if they got paid it would give them more time to focus on the sport. Athletes should be paid earlier so it will help them in the pros by giving them confidence so they don 't get worried that they are going to spend all of their money. If athletes get paid earlier it will help the manage their money when their older so it will help them pay bills.
Athletes would are (doesn’t make sense) there just to play sports and don’t care about their degree, it wouldn’t matter how they preform in school because they are being paid. Most athletes who are playing are already receiving some sort of compensation in scholarships and grants. College athletes are not employees in the eyes of the school, they are students who “just happen to be playing sports” (Cooper 12). College athletes put too much pressure on their athletic career, when they should put the pressure on getting a degree and a
So would the prospects not be the job applicant? From the start of their high school careers, the players minds are geared towards signing to the Division I level. Many believe that if professionalism and contracts are brought into college sports then it would corrupt the amateur competition (Furth). However, the Division I level is not an amateur league. In a civil suit to have athletes paid, the 9th Circuit Court ruled that student athletes at Northwestern University would be paid $5,000 per year exceeding the cost of tuition within their athletic scholarships.
To accomplish this goal colleges will have agreed to certain terms and conditions. It is imperative that college athletes are paid. Just imagine going to work everyday and not getting paid. By providing college athletes with an income they will not have to struggle to get things that they want and need. This could lead to many other problems that could get a student kicked out of college permanently.
Some would argue that college football players should not be paid for various reasons. One of these reasons is because they think the players are at college to get an education, sports are a secondary or extracurricular activity. The players are generating money for the school, which pays for school and other things around campus. Many people might say that it is unfair to the other sports that are less popular. Football is a very difficult sport to play, these players practice and practice, they need to be rewarded for all this work.
And I 'm Arguing why player should get paid. If you 're wondering why college athletes should get paid let me tell you there are a of reasons. 1st most college athletes struggling financially and they don’t get a lot of income from their jobs. ( If they have one) They also struggle with having to juggle grades, practice and a job so they can play. But taking off the weight of a job would help tremendously so they aren 't stressed as much.
Also they might argue, college athletes should be considered students first, because by receiving direct payment, they would basically be employees or professionals rather than students. College athletes may forget that their main purpose at school is to learn and study, not to receive money. Finally, if you pay college athletes it would take money away from college budgets that could be used to invest in research, to hire better staff, or to renovate facilities and technology. If colleges are going to invest more money in a program, it should be in academics,
There are many different ways to earn money. In the article “Should College Athletes be Paid,” both Joe Nocera and Bob Williams have very different opinions. Although these athletes bring in money for the school, college athletes should not be paid because being paid could prevent other students from participating in college sports and it could take their attention away from academics. Many people love to purchase items for their favorite college team or college player. When purchasing these items, the school is given money, as Joe Nocera states,”... the football and basketball players are there to generate revenue for the school.”(22) Many see that it is unfair for the main attraction to not be paid.
Colleges should not start paying their athletes for participating in a sport because the athletes have already gotten paid in education, and they aren’t professionals yet. Opponents say college athletes would be back payed for letting other businesses use their images, but they are already being compensated. Colleges that give athletes scholarships to attend their schools already pay the students by letting them get an education for free. In the words of researchers Ben
The other 30% of students believe that college athletes shouldn’t be paid only because of their age, only being in highschool and because they haven’t made it big. One student Logan Klaproth believes, “They[student athletes] should be paid because they advertise the sports teams and merchandise for the school yet the athletes are not getting paid a single cent. Furthermore, since they are paying for college at the same time being paid for playing sports would help them pay student loans and their college
Student athletes need an income to help pay the extra money they owe that the scholarship doesn’t pay for, and also so that they have some money when they come out of college. Paying college athletes is a way to encourage students to play sports. Colleges willing to pay for their players could attract talented athletes. Students may want to go out for a sport if they know they will be paid, which could also bring talent to the field or court. With new talent, teams could win more and earn more recognition.
If these top tier athlete’s were given the opportunity to be paid thousands of dollars for their athletic additions to a program, there would be very little incentive for them to focus on their education. Athletes are given extraordinary compensation through full scholarships and the addition of a paycheck for playing would almost nullify the need for an education as their athletics got them into the school for free, make them money, and given them a chance to play professionally for a living. Although that may turnout to be a viable option for some players, it defeats the purpose of getting a college education and is a risky path for most. Paying a student for their extracurricular would provide
The reasoning for the objections can include that “they are just amateurs,” and that they “should be grateful to receive a free education.” For the people who say that they are amateurs, college athletics is just as big of a business as professional sports are, but the difference is that all of the money in college sports go to the athletic directors, coaches, commissioners, and NCAA instead of going to the players. Also, they spend roughly forty hours a week playing, practicing, and training for their sport, which is almost as much as a typical job. That means that their Division I sport is technically their job, so shouldn’t they be compensated for it? Regarding the argument that student athletes should be grateful they receive a free education, this “free education” is only free for so many people. Most athletes are not on full scholarship, which means that they do not get their education 100% for free.
A big issue in college sports is whether or not to pay the athletes that participate in the sporting programs. My side would be with people who think that the players should not get paid. I believe that it would affect their in game performance all together. Even if they did get paid I think most athletes would spend their money on things that would overall get them in trouble. I also think the free scholarship most get is the same as getting paid only they cannot spend their money on what they want.
How does the idea of college athletes getting paid sound? The benefits of this is that it can help athletes support their family. Another benefit is players could stay longer in school. But their is some cons, like financial irresponsibility and unfair competition between players. So by doing this you could be facing pros and cons.