Suppose everyone in the world had access to $15.8 billion; how do you think it would affect the state of society as a whole? The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) claims that Division 1 athletes make this much money even though their schools do not pay them to play. Both schools benefit financially from their student-athlete's participation in intercollegiate athletics. The added stress of providing for oneself financially for four years of education is a significant challenge. Each player is expected to manage his or her time and finances in college. Although most schools prioritize academics over sports, Colleges should compensate student-athletes fairly because of everything they provide. For this reason, college sports programs …show more content…
The topic of where universities get their massive reserve funds needs some thought. Some of the money made could be directly attributable to the athletes themselves. Products of this type include tickets to games and even t-shirts worn by student-athletes that are put up for sale. In addition, many former students return to their alma mater to attend athletic contests where their former teammates participate. This is in line with the argument I made in my thesis, which is that the popularity of college sports draws in new financial support for universities thanks to student-athletes' influence. This is a direct result of college sports' influence. The College Raptors claim that if a school has a successful athletic program, it will see a gain in revenue due to the increased demand for athletic events and related merchandise.
Because not all schools provide the same education, students can expect to pay different amounts to enroll in courses at various schools.
…show more content…
It has been argued that college athletes should not be paid for their time and effort in competition. People have the idea that academics should take priority over sports. Numerous people believe that financial resources would be better served by facilitating more kids' education rather than investing in sports. There is some truth to the claim that college athletes are not all competing on a fair playing field. Even though they may not possess the same talent as their teammates, certain college athletes receive extensive recruitment. This could significantly impact the earnings of college athletes. Although much consideration has to go into this issue, Some athletes may be superior to others, but they all deserve praise for their accomplishments. The vast majority of student-athletes work countless hours to compete for their college, and the dedication required to do so justifies the offer of some financial compensation. Concerns aside, paying college players should be guaranteed when considering the benefits college athletes provide to the schools that sponsor
Summary: This article tackles the question of whether or not college athletes are being unfairly exploited due to not being paid. By specifically looking at a court case that aimed to settle this dispute, the author suggests that the court decided that salaries for players were banned because in doing so, the “product” of college sports was being preserved. Abbott explains that college sports will lose their authenticity because of the fact that providing salaries for these athletes will greatly favor large and well funded athletic programs. The compensation will greatly lessen the chance for any type of “upset” or “Cinderella story” and therefore make college sports boring. Analysis: This article will be helpful in supporting the synthesis
College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.
Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.
Football, basketball, and baseball, in particular, generate billions of dollars a year for colleges in ticket sales, merchandise sales, and advertisements” (Drew 1). Because of how much money is being earned by a school, college athletes could earn some of this money. But, the school might use the money on other things such as campus needs. But, “ensuring that student-athletes are paid may not only alleviate the financial burden that some families face when sending their children to college. It may also encourage college athletes to stay for education before going pro” (Bouchrika 4).
This money is generated through TV contracts, merchandise sales, and ticket sales, all of which are made possible by the hard work of college athletes. It’s only fair that the athletes should receive a portion of this revenue, especially considering the fact that they are putting in the hours of practice and competing in games.
Another valid reason college athletes deserve pay is because of the numerous expenses that are not covered by sports scholarships. College athletes have the potential to be cash cows for their colleges and bring their institutions
College athletes frequently put in a lot of time, effort, and risk, but they don't always receive the credit or compensation they deserve from the NCAA and the schools they represent. One factor as to why college athletes should
If these colleges had to raise tuition prices it would make it very difficult for non-athletes to pay for their tuition. This could even sway non-athletes away from attending these
Thus, not paying college athletes and forcing them to be focused on only their sport affects not only a person’s education, but also their entire future. Paying college athletes would specifically affect player attitudes towards the sport. Money can psychologically change how human beings think and perceive things. Paying college athletes will therefore completely change their thoughts and ideas about their sport. College athletes may end up trying harder on the sport.
Colleges willing to pay for their players could attract talented athletes. Students may want to go out for a sport if they know they will be paid, which could also bring talent to the field or court. With new talent, teams could win more and earn more recognition. This would benefit the players, coach and
It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
A multitude of people falsely believe that the NCAA (National Collegiate Athletic Association) and its members earn millions of dollars in profit yearly. In fact, “the NCAA distributes 90 percent of its revenue back to different college campuses and conferences. That money funds programs supporting the academic needs and well-being of student-athletes” (Nocera). Over the last few years, controversy has risen inside the realm of college sports. Athletes, coaches, fans, scholars, and students have voiced their opinion.
College Athletes Should Get Paid David Young Northwest Christian High School English 7-8 Dr. Yoder February 25, 2022 Abstract College athletes have been taken advantage of for what they can do athletically, and they are being used for others’ gain. College athletes deserve to be paid for their hard work and the entertainment they provide. Others, however, would argue that they are already being paid and do not deserve anymore pay.
Should college athletes be paid? Annotated Bibliography Benedykiuck, Mike. “The Blue Line: College athletes should be paid.” Dailyfreepress.