Steroids are commonly associated with a negative connotation when it comes to athletes and body builders. Yet few are informed about the benefits steroids provide. There are two types of steroids: Cortisone and Anabolic steroids. Cortisone steroids are used to treat medical conditions whereas anabolic steroids are used to replicate human sex hormones. Steroids benefit those with hormone imbalances, respiratory disorders and increase athletic ability.
Athletes may gain advantages over another because one may gain a better performance than the other who is playing fair. The use of taking drugs is deliberal with the goal of achieving an unfair advantage over others. However, there are those who believe taking drugs are not unfair advantages. Norman Forst, a professor and director of the medical ethics program at the university of wisconsin, quotes “There is no coherent argument to support the view that enhancing performance is unfair; if it were, we would ban coaching and training”. He says that using drugs is not unfair because it is the same thing as being coached or trained.
To consider the performance of a player who uses steroids equal to a player that doesn’t is plain out unfair. Therefore, the records set by steroid users shouldn’t even be considered in the record books due to their ability to outperform other average players’. A significant minority of players are concerned about the effects steroid use has on the sports record book stated in a survey done by USA TODAY and The Sports Xchange (Jenkins). One could even argue that the player’s averages per game or season shouldn’t be kept as their steroid use could have helped with those statistics as
“Athletes are also barred from human growth hormone, which reputable helps with injury recovery, but they have free use of muscle-building creatine” “Detractors will argue that steroids and doping can pose health risks to the athletes involved, but athletes undertake serious health risks by simply walking on to the field or straddling a bike”(Why It 's Time to Legalize Steroids in Professional Sports). It is true, a lot of people use this argument saying that athletes already put their lives in danger by playing the sport, the steroid just helps them play it better or with fewer
Steroids should only be used for medical reasons and not for better performance. I cannot seem to understand why athletes would take any kind of drug without medical advice or take any drug with so many hazardous side effects. There are reasons why people do what they do, but after researching performance enhancing drugs, I would not think of any reason to use such a drug with so many ill side effects. In my opinion, if you do not have the natural ability and have to rely on a performance-enhancing type of drug, you should not be playing. Drug testing would be the best idea, but it is still not 100% on results quite yet.
Do you think that Performance Enhancing Drugs should be illegal for everybody considering the fact that it gives people an unfair advantage over other people who don’t take PEDs because they want to play a fair game? If PEDs were illegal, then teams wouldn’t have to worry about their players getting hurt because there isn 't any huge juiced up beast out there trying to hurt everybody. Performance Enhancing Drugs should become an illegal drug so that no pro player can get their hands on them because it gives players an unfair advantage, and it gives them a suspension from playing if they are caught using them. It also gives the percentage of injuries to go up because players are out on the field all juiced up. So why do they use them?
They cause problems in your cardiovascular system, they generate unwanted and sometimes dangerous side effects, and eventually lead to liver complications. Although there are some upsides to the legalization of Performance Enhancing Drugs, for the most part these upsides are opinions or inferences. In conclusion, they take away the thrill and love for sports, people pushing themselves to their physical limits. These drugs take that away from not only the user, but all others playing and watching. PEDs put on ugliness to sports and replace passion and motivation with drugs and
Drug Abuse Some people will do anything to win at any cost. Drug use is not beneath them. Although some athletes use steroids, they should not be allowed in sports because it is considered cheating, it is associated with violence, and these are health risks. Steroid use is considered cheating because it gives an unfair advantage. It increases stamina, muscle, enlargement of breast, shrinkage of testicles, deeper voice, etc.
Anabolic steroids are a synthetic derivative of testosterone. Anabolic steroids promote the storage of protein and the growth of tissue. It was created to treat hypogonadism, which is a condition in which the testes do not produce enough testosterone for normal growth, and sexual functioning. There is no cure for hypogonadism; however, anabolic steroids are used for treatment. A few years after they were made, people began illegally using them for body building.
Intellect, like athletic skill, is a mix of genetics and hard work: biomedical enhancements undermine all that hard work. It would eliminate intellectual competition and therefore could eliminate innovation and progress. For these reasons I think it is immoral. However, in certain cases, biomedical enhancements of intellect can be justifiably moral. People with attention deficits are given medication to aid their concentration: this is not immoral in my opinion, it simply evens the playing field: it doesn’t simply give everyone the same level of intelligence, it gives everyone an even opportunity to attain a higher
Some of them have a perception that they might not be good enough on their own, so they juice up to get that extra boost. They will experience greater levels of strength, endurance, and enhanced athletic performance ("Effects Of Steroids - Positive And Negative Side Effects"). They would have to plan when they juice up very carefully though. Since steroids are illegal unless prescribed by a doctor, they would have to plan around upcoming drug tests and hope there are no surprise drug tests. If caught, these people would face hefty fines and suspensions.
This is because many organizations are trying to create more somewhat harsher bans to cause players to want to veer away from the use of these type of drugs. There are two distinct sides to this controversial topic, those who are believe that there should be penalties for players using performance enhancing drugs, and those who believe there should not be any penalties for players caught using performance enhancing drugs. Those who believe there should be consequences believe that there are way too many health risk factors which plays into the use of these types of performance enhancing drugs. They also see that there is a major disadvantage in sports because these drugs gives players that use them the upper hand vs the ones that do not use them. The ones that believe there should not be any penalties for players caught using performance enhancing drugs believe that there are some beneficial health increases that the user receives when he/she uses these drugs.
Doug Brignole comments, “A guaranteed drug-free competitive arena is justifiable though it is completely unrealistic” (qtd. in Wang). For instance, some cyclists never actually tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs but rather their usage was revealed through personal confessions (Wang). Being that performance-enhancing drugs are hard to detect and genetics also play an important role in athletic ability, doping in the sporting industry is