Soon after the items were taxed the people would stop buying them. That’s what made the merchants mad! The reaction to the king was to tax even more items without the consent of the colonies permission. An example of an item that was taxed without permission of the people was the, Stamp Act. The Stamp Act happened, November 1765 when the king taxed stamps.
After the Seven Years’ War (1756-1763) Britain was in financial turmoil. Although Britain gained imperial assets, they also gained a massive national debt so Britain looked to the North American colonies as a source of revenue. In 1765, British Parliament passed the Stamp Act, which was an internal tax in the colonies. This was the first time Britain ever tried to tax the colonies but the colonies were upset because they felt only their elected colonial assemblies could tax them. They resisted the act then resorted to violence and intimidation.
The colonists viewed this as abuse. The tea party and the Sons of Liberty were both brought on because of the Boston Massacre. In 1770 Parliament repealed all the townshend duties besides tea. That led a temporary truce between the two sides in the years before the American Revolution. The next act was the Protest British Taxation Act.
Sir Edmund Andros undermined and suppressed the town governments of the Dominion of New England, including the Massachusetts assembly. He decreased the authority of the Massachusetts assembly. C is correct, because the merchants, ministers, and militias of Boston arrested Sir Edmund Andros and his aides to remove him from power once word of the Glorious Revolution reached them. The colonists figured that if the people of England could remove a hated leader then they could remove their hated governor. Sir Edmund Andros was deposed as a result of the Glorious Revolution, but shortly after the new monarchs installed new royal governors in an attempt to reassert royal authority.
Just two years after he returned, Franklin was sent back to London as a representative of the Pennsylvania Assembly. While Franklin was in London, unrest over the new laws being passed by England was sweeping through the colonies. Franklin also believed that the new taxes and laws were unfair, he argued that it was the right of a British citizen to vote on their own taxes. He lobbied against laws such as the stamp act and eventually helped get every law repealed, except for a tax on tea. Britain 's refusal to remove the tax lead to the Boston Tea Party.
The British won the French and Indian War after the signing of the Treaty of Paris in 1763. This victory granted Britain ownership of the Ohio River Valley territory, but resulted in a heavy war debt. After the war, the Pueblo Revolt caused England to issue the Proclamation of 1763, which prohibited settlement on the newly gained Ohio River Valley. Britain’s large war debt led to the enforcement of taxes on the American colonists without their consent. In reaction to the boycotting of English goods, Britain enforced the Intolerable Acts as a reminder of their power over the colonies.
In 1765 the British parliament passed the quartering act law. It forced us to give the soldiers quarters, food, and transportation. We were robbed and infuriated. At last, Brittan restricted all settlement across the Appellation Mountains. This made speculators who wanted to purchase land there
For instance when colonist boycotted and protested then Parliament repealed the stamp act. The British had placed almost a direct tax on the colonies and so they fired back. Then their was the Boston tea party, colonist were protesting and ended up throwing 342 barrels of tea into Boston harbor. That made Britain very angry but unfortunately they did not repeal the act, because parliament wanted to keep the act to remind the colonies that they still had a right to tax them. There was also the Townshend acts which lead up to the Boston massacre.
The British felt it was the right way to get out of the debt from ongoing wars with French. Several acts such as the Sugar Act and Stamp act were levied to because they felt america should “pay” since they received benefits from the victory,but the acts didn 't last and then were later repealed. In reprisal of the taxes the colonies produced a showdown known as The Boston Tea Party. A group of american colonists disguised as Native Americans threw over 300 trunks cargo from the british tea ships into the boston harbor. This resulted in the Quartering Act which required american colonists to provide food and housing for British soldiers at the colonies’ expense.
In order to reform the Empire and improve the financial issues, the British passed several new policies over the American colonies such as the Sugar Act, the Stamp Act and the Townshend Duty Act beneficial to gain revenue from the taxation. However, to many colonists, these regulations had violated their rights and properties. Therefore, they requested the King to repeal these Acts and refuse the Parliament’s rights to tax the colonies by sending to British the Declaration of Rights and Grievances. Plus, a group of people in Boston called themselves Sons of Liberty and protested against the Acts. The frictions between the American townspeople and the British soldiers kept increasing and had caused five deaths in the Boston Massacre.
The colonists in Boston were so outraged that the Sons of Liberty snuck to the shipyard in Native American costumes and threw 342 chests of tea into the harbor. This event is famously known as the Boston Tea Party. As a result, in 1774 the Coercive Acts, nicknamed the Intolerable Acts by the colonists, were a new set of taxes that only affected Boston. It forbade trade between Boston and the other colonies and it took away their rights to self-govern. These actions toward Boston were unfair considering that there were many other similar Tea Parties that were completely ignored by the British.
King George III was aware of the state of his territories and the actions of his colonists, making him extremely nervous. The Americans had been taking bribes from the French in the Seven Years’ War. This infuriated King George and left him feeling betrayed, resulting in him passing the Proclamation of 1763. The Proclamation stated that no colonist was permitted to settle land west of the Appellation Mountains, to the dismay of the colonist. To make sure that the Proclamation was being
The people realized that the king did not care about them but alone what he could get from them. The American Revolution affected many people, in different ways. In addition to the Boston Tea Party, boycotts, and the passing of new laws by parliament are all significant effects of the Revolution. People under British government were effected the most by all the new laws being passed. Facing high taxation from parliament, Boston harbor was closed, and town meetings were banned.
The American Revolution was not avoidable because of British policies that were unfair to colonists. An example is the Proclamation of 1763 which prohibited colonists from moving west of the Appalachian Mountains. This policy limited opportunity for colonists. Another issue that angered colonists was the increase of taxation without representation.The colonists reaction to these policies were protests, boycotts, and harassing tax collectors. The french and indian war lead to tension because then the British government had to pay for weapons and such to win the fight resulting in them falling into a lot of debt.
In his article, Holton supports this by stating, “From the complex struggle of the 1780’s, the Founding Fathers extracted a simple lesson: that the uneducated farmers who seized the ship of state during the American Revolution had damn near driven it aground.” He continues to say that most ordinary Americans during this time were not yet ready or capable to rule themselves. This negative portrayal of democracy created a struggle of who should rule at home among the colonies. Barbarism was another problem that contributed to the struggle for authority among the colonies and with British control as well. With Loyalty to Britain waning, the colonist looked for excuses to justify a revolutionary war. In Peter Silvers article, Barbarism and the American Revolution, he argues that the colonist used the discourse of “savagery”