Close the Gun Show Loophole . “If it’s OK to register cars and license drivers, why is it not OK to impose similar legal responsibilities on gun owners?” (Steven King). In most places in the United States people are required to register their weapons, so the government is able to track sales, but there is a different story at gun shows. People at gun shows can effortlessly get their hands on weapons illegally. These weapons are sold through private-party sellers without background checks or identification.
Design Journal Criterion A Introduction: My global cause is on the impacts of gun control in the world (primarily the U.S.). The reason I chose this case is because of the past yearly (2014-2016) protests and debates that don 't seem to have definite solutions at the best.The problem overall is the idea of control of firearms. There are pros and cons to that I see for gun control itself and I believe that there is a big problem with how it’s presented in our country: People get shot, take away the guns. People can’t defend themselves, give them a gun. It’s a complicated system overall when you look at it.
People that are fearful of mass shootings or tragedies caused by weapons have to realize that guns are needed to stop the tragedy weather it is a regular citizen or a police officer. Guns are not bad it is people that make them bad. Instead of banning guns catching criminals would be much more efficient. Gun laws are not going to solve problems they will only create more. Weather guns are used for protection or hunting or just going to the shooting range they have been around in the US for centuries and always will be.
This paper will examine the problems, laws, and response to guns over the past decades. First of all, guns have been a huge problem for many citizens lives in the US today. Guns in a crime are a lot more likely to cause a death than other weapon, so laws are put in place to stop this. (Zimring 440) With so much power, guns are
For instance, her use of the slogan from Senator Barry Goldwater, stating that, “We have a crime problem in this country, not a gun problem” (549). Desuka addresses that Senator Goldwater is only half correct in his statement. Mainly because Goldwater does not entirely state the truth, according to the research she has made on handguns. The research showing that it is not only the criminals that kill people, but that guns are a tool for an easier assassination. Leading us to believe that if criminals were without a gun there would be a greater chance of surviving from a vile attack.
Meaning this law may restrict the health service from providing their treatment because people with mental problem can use the guns and kill the innocent people. This may be the reason why the law is against the treatment. From my opinion, these disadvantages are common sense. In one hand, people who are mentally sick are suppose to get treatment in order to reduce the amount of gun death. They use guns and shoot out of their sense and out of control.
What would anybody think if you saw a stranger having a gun on them because you don 't often see people with them, they may think it 's going to be a mass murderer or something similar. So that means that a gun can make a situation seem violent. Others may also say that gun control laws do not determine crime but gun ownership determines crime, anyone who can read this would think that it 's not going to be true for everyone in the world because we are all different. So laws make people able to own guns so when you are able to own a gun it determines the crime so laws determine ownership and crime determines its
This doesn 't mean that they don 't want change or feel that we need to change, they just believe we shouldn 't get rid of guns completely. They say that guns don 't kill people, people kill people, guns just make it easier for them to do it. According to CNBC and Former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee “When somebody has an intent to do incredible damage, they 're going to find a way to do it." This trying to prove the point that guns don 't kill people, people kill people. Many believe it is a violation of their second amendment rights which states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” If gun control was to be put into place by the government then it would make the second amendment useless.
Gun laws have been around since the 1930s starting with the National Firearms Act in 1934. Since then, there has been a long timeline of domestic terrorist attacks and changes in these laws that have consequently altered the way people view the idea of gun control. The issue of gun control is very controversial and involves many political and social perspectives. Gun laws are often debated due to ideas of violence and self defense. The basis of any gun control argument can often be linked to the concept of the second amendment which states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” The different interpretations of this amendment results
The American public views guns as a means of self-defense and this perception have been slowly changing, due to the damage and havoc by these mass shootings. He asks for an immediate solution to the problem, insisting the importance of effective gun control and measures to stop further
We need "common" background tests for the reason that there 's a very gigantic loophole in the existing federal regulation that enables detrimental men and women to receive possession of a gun. When the Supreme courtroom ruled that the possession of a gun for personal protection was a constitutional proper underneath the 2d modification, additionally they ruled that a few classes of people might be denied this right. Among the prohibited classes of humans are felons and the significantly mentally in poor health. Nearly everybody has the same opinion that these are confined and reasonable restrictions on the correct to possess a gun. As a way to make sure that these prohibited people can not acquire a gun, the FBI maintains the country wide
Different parts of the country have separate views regarding gun control laws. Such as, Americans from the south may say current gun control laws are fine, and Americans in the north may say they need to be stricter. Some would even say guns need to be banned all together. If an individual’s ultimate goal is to commit bodily harm to someone, they are going to do it whether they have a gun or not. However, normal procedures for purchasing a gun such as waiting periods, gun registrations, and background checks are sufficient for keeping guns from those who mean to do harm.
Gun control comprises of the government confining the right of American citizens to buy weapons. The diverse sorts of gun control differ from waiting periods among when you buy the firearm and when you really get it, background checks for high-risk individuals so that they can 't buy weapons through legal networks, and totally banning certain sorts of weapons. There are countless methods for crooks to maintain a strategic distance from these regulations ethat the government enforces, making them just reduce the skill of guiltless people securing their home and family 's ability to buy weapons. The waiting period strategy for gun control is essentially a two-step procedure. The initial step in the procedure is that the individual that is in need of a firearm goes