Do you believe that police officers should wear body cameras? Imagine being a fourteen year old and a cop stops you, you´re scared because you don't know why they stopped you and they have a gun. You are asking them not to shoot but they do. How do you think a body camera could have helped in this situation? Body cameras used by police officers are little cameras that are attached to the officers vest and it records every interaction with a suspected suspect. Evidence can provide meaning and show key things that may have happened during a situation. Footage also protects everyone; this means everyone in the situation is protected because the world is watching them. Body cameras also have reliable technology meaning the technology on the …show more content…
According to the passages it states ¨on August 9, 2014 Michael Brown, an 18 year old resident of Ferguson Missouri, was shot and killed by police officer Darren Wilson, at about noon on that day, Wilson observed brown and a friend on the street, nothing that brown matched the description of a suspect in a convenience store robbery , Wilsonasked the two men to move to the sidewalk. An altercation reportedly ensued between Wilson and Brown untindently Wilson fired upon Brown who was unarmed. Brown did not survive¨ (“Police Body Camera Use In The United States' ' 2). This shows that if there was a body camera this would have gone differently it would've shown what happened. I would have made the situation better because the camera would have probably made the officer act differently. Mr. Wilson had no reason to fire at Mr. Brown who didnt even match the description of the suspect and who was unarmed. Another piece of evidence is “Additionally a study conducted by george mason found that police officers said the cameras were helpful when collecting evidence and protecting themselves officers and citizens both seem to believe that BWC´s can protect them from each other¨ (¨Police Body Cameras Use In United States¨ 2). This shows that even police and citizens both think that body cameras are helpful with protecting them from harms of different police officers who might have had a bad day and just want to find a way to relieve stress. To conclude police officers should wear body cameras because it protects
Police body cameras are extremely helpful to the justice system and law enforcement because they provide visual and audio evidence for events that have happened. They are efficient and reliable because they are clipped to a police officer's shirt, and records everything that goes on during a dispute. Police body cameras improve police accountability, they provide evidence in criminal cases, and prove police testimony to the public and to Law Enforcement. They record interactions between the police officers and the public, and provide truthful information to the public and Law Enforcement agencies. One thing that police body cameras do is improve police accountability.
Although the conduct of police officers and the validity of the video evidence will be highly scrutinized, body cameras are necessary because police brutality and falsified reports would be diminished. Malcom X stated “If someone puts their hands on you make sure they never put their hands on anybody else again.” In my personal opinion, I feel the police officers would be held in check due to their knowing that they are constantly being monitored. First I will state by explaining why cameras are considered an unbiased resource.
Body cameras on law enforcement officers can by far be one of the best ways to slow down or even stop law enforcement officer’s misconduct in the field by providing a bird’s eye view of the law enforcement officer’s encounters with the public in the community they have sworn to protect. Body cameras can be a deterrent and possibly make law enforcement officers and the citizens think very hard before acting in an inappropriate manner because they know they are being recorded and these recording can be used as evidence in a court of
Arizona State University 's Center for Violence Prevention and Community Safety on body camera studies, Professor Michael D. White states “Body-worn cameras (BWCs) are perhaps the most debated topic in policing today. Advocates and critics have made numerous claims about the impact and consequences of the technology, but most of these claims are untested. BWCs have the potential to completely transform police-citizen encounters, and in the wake of the shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, adoption of the technology is likely to be exponential. This transformation, in the virtual absence of empirical evidence on BWCs, is profoundly troubling.” So although there are many pros and cons to body worn cameras by police officers, the benefits surely outweigh the negatives and more studies are being conducted to prove
In addition to helping the public with the shootings and unnecessary death caused by police, the body cams will have the cops to blame be fired. This will also help regain trust between the police and citizens. When the officers who are on duty know that the camera is on, then they will think ahead about their own future, their career. Also, the officers will think twice about the other person as well. After researching about body cameras, and how the technology can help the authorities, and citizens.
The officer who shot him was fired three days after Jordan was killed and now faces murder charges” (Body Cameras Help Everyone-Including the Police). This evidence shows that body cameras can be used as evidence to be proven later guilty or innocent. The officer was proven guilty by body camera footage which was incorrect from his
There have been many complaints about if body cameras on police officers will work or not. There are two people that have different opinions that other people that think body cameras will stop police brutality against police officers. William N. Grigg, and Joshua Krause these people think body cameras on police officers will not work, and will not stop or decrease the violence from police officers. Grigg’s argument is Their arguments are that the officers from the SDPD forgot to turn on their body cameras while on duty. A crime that happened in April, Officer Neal Browder fatally shot a 31-year-old man named Fridoon Zalbeg Rawshannehad, who had been suspected of carrying a knife.
A major benefit for having body cams is the fact that it will decrease the force used by Police Officers. For the past couple of years there has been many videos of Police Officers using excessive force against innocent victims, especially with African Americans. “The notion has been around for a while. But since August 's fatal shooting of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri -- for which witness accounts varied widely -- it 's gained traction to become part of the national conversation about police conduct.” (Brandon Griggs 1)
Police brutality has been a raging topic ever since the Ferguson case and officers using excessive force can be stopped by using body cameras to see a cops’ every move. In the article, “Body Cameras Will Stop Police Brutality”, the author brings to concern issues of excessive force to subdue a suspect. The author comments, “Having a video record of events not only deters the use of excessive force, but it also helps dispute or demonstrate claims of police brutality” (Body Cameras Will Stop Police Brutality 1). Having a video recording of an event can save a police officer's job or destroy it. By being a cop who follows the rules and does the right thing, an officer will not have to change his or her behaviors and will continue being himself or herself.
For the police officers to wear the body cameras it values the safety of the cop and the individual. Whenever they come into contact verbally and if it gets physical then it
Now there is two possible outcomes, there was police misconduct and abuse of power, or the police officer did everything correctly and by the book. Either way there needs to be something that can protect the public from police misconduct and also protect law enforcement from dealing with false accusations that can tarnish their reputation. That is why body worn cameras need to be mandatory for all police officers to wear because it protects the public and the police officers that are wearing them. A couple positive outcomes police officers wearing body cameras is how they can lower police officers misuse of authority and also lower false complaints against officers as well. These are two
“Take a Picture (or Video), It Lasts Longer” On August 9th 2014, Michael Brown, an unarmed black teenager, was shot and killed by police officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson Missouri. On November 24th, the St. Louis grand jury decided there were no probable cause to indict Mr. Wilson. This decision sparked an outrage around the community where building where set on fire and lootings were prevalent around the city. With much of the evidence being he-say-she-say, it is hard for the public to actually know what happened. This led to an increased interest in body cameras.
One of the more widely renowned cases in which a body camera would have been useful is the case of Michal Slager. Slager is a former police officer of South Carolina. The reason that it’s important to put emphasis on the word “former” is that he was recently involved in a murder trial. Slager had shot a black man named Walter Scott. Slager’s justification for shooting Scott was that Scott had stolen his taser and had attempted to attack Slager with it.
Speech Outline Title: Body Cameras I. Introduction Attention-getter: Body cameras were used because of Michael Brown’s death and police misconduct. B. Significance Body cameras may increase police accountability and protect them from accusations. C. Credibility: My interest in this topic is due to the latest deadly encounters with police officers and improving the communities’ safety.
Police should wear body cameras because they can improve the public view of police by showing the human side which can help to provide evidence when a person may not be able to, and it protects both parties which both are a vital part of policing. Police officers should be required to wear body cameras so that their use of force can be documented and judged. It's time to think about what measures can be put into place to hold all law enforcement accountable. As a person who has had two friends experience police brutality at the hands of the police it's time to enforce the wearing of the body cameras. Police in every state should agree on letting officers wear an on officer recording system, or body cams that are the size of a ink pen that can be attached to hats, helmets, or collars of their uniforms.