The Pros And Cons Of GMO Labeling

There is a serious battle against the spread of GMOs, especially when there is a potential of harming our health. The J.R. Simplot Company is known for importing GMO potatoes in the USA market shelves and consumers have spotted these products in grocery shops in New Orleans, L.A.

on genetically modified foods and poses the question of whether or not labels should be

2,000 studies have documented that Gmo foods are just as safe or even safer than organic foods. Amy Paturel who specializes in food nutrition and Robin Yamakawa who went to the University of North Carolina wrote,

One of the benefits of GMOs in agriculture is the viability of sustainable food production. A potential problem with GMOs is the possibility of cancer from high nitrogen and other chemical pollutant levels. These are caused by synthetic pesticides, potential waste problems, and genetically modified foods. I find the argument for non GMOs to be more persuasive because it avoids the potential of cancer, allergies, antibiotic resistance, pesticide exposure, and environment

Genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, play a major role in our society whether we realize it or not. The controversy of whether or not we should be using GMOs steadily increases due to new information becoming available along with new research being conducted., Benefits of GMOs including the decrease use of pesticides, food production, and creating food are topics that will help explain the reason why GMOs should be used. These topics will include proven facts along with actual results that back up these benefits. On the other side of the controversy lies the reasons we should not be using GMOs. Research and facts will outline the reasons including health issues that have risen from GMOs along with the side effects caused by GMOs. This

There is currently no requirement by the FDA for GMOs to be labeled. This is a negative, because if you do not want to purchase GMOs, you cannot know for sure what you are purchasing. You must look for foods with a seal stating the food is “Non-GMO Project Verified,” otherwise you may consume genetically modified foods.

The labelling of genetically modified foods is seen as wholesome common sense, and it should be required to have the information on the back of every product. People have been manipulating the genetic makeup of plants for numerous generations using the process of traditional cross breeding. Genetically modified crops have been traded, grown and consumed around the world, including Australia since 1996. The progress and advancement in this field has impacted the way we view the deeper issues of this technology. While genetic engineering crop property has been gradually increasing, so have concerns, in that producing and eating genetically modified foods may pose unexpected environmental and health hazards. The disagreement for labelling comes

What do a tomato, soybean and a french fry have in common? They are all some of the most commonly genetically modified foods sold on the market today. By using the genetic information from one organism, and inserting or modifying it into another organism, scientists can make food crops stay fresher, grow bigger, and have the crops create their own pesticides. Nevertheless, the technology to modify genes has surpassed its practicality. Genetically modified foods need to be removed from everyday agriculture because of the threat they pose to human health, the environment, and the impact on global economy.

For years, the health and safety of genetically modified foods have been debated and researched by scientists, but the question still stands: should genetically modified foods be allowed for consumption? The process of genetic modification involves inserting a gene from bacteria or a virus into an organism where it would normally not be found. The purpose is to alter the genetic code in plants and animals to make them more productive or resistant to pests or farming techniques. Genetically modified organisms, more commonly known as GMOs, have been a controversial topic of debate for a number of reasons. The ethics behind genetically modified foods come into question due to an abundance of short and long-term effects from the process, many of which are still unknown today. It is unethical to genetically modify foods without proper government regulations and thorough research into the negative effects it poses upon human consumption and environmental health.

In William Saletan’s “Unhealthy Fixation”, the truth about GMOs is discussed and explored. In his argument, Saletan effectively uses pathos, ethos, and logos to prove his beliefs regarding the labeling, applications, and safety of GMO’s. To help accomplish this, he writes on the incredible potential of GMOs (logos), speaks to their safety, and tells how GMOs can, and have, saved countless lives in third world countries (pathos), additionally, discusses the research he has put into this work (ethos).

The labeling of GMO food is pure common sense, and we should have that information just like we have calorie count. Genetically modified foods are increasingly controversial as they become more widespread. The U.S. manufactures more genetically modified (GM) foods than any other country (Streker). Sixty-one countries, including most developed countries, require labeling of genetically modified foods except for the United States (Burgaard). “In the genetic engineering process, scientists splice a specific gene that exhibits certain traits into a plant to create new artificial characteristics in organisms” (Burgaard; Streker). The resulting organism is considered GM, or genetically modified. The desired traits currently being practiced through genetic engineering are insect resistance, weed control, and improved nutritional content (Turner). The

Monsanto and other companies such as those that own Larabar, Silk and Kashi do not want consumers to know the truth about GMOs in the foods they have purchased. They are also spending huge sums of money to try to defeat Proposition 37. “The Proposition dictates that labeling is required on raw and processed food if it has been made using Genetically Modified material.”(Rodale)(No on Proposition 37) In March, Whole Foods Markets announced that by 2018 all of their products that have been Genetically Modified will be labeled. This caused an uproar in Monsanto and other other companies involved in the the idea of Genetically Modified foods, and also grabbed much media attention.(Labeling of Genetically Modified Foods) “The Movements against GMO’s have caused widespread trouble for the corrupt corporations. “People against Monsanto” and even “PETA” have joined in the argument as well have opened the eyes of many people who normally buy these GM brand foods and deterred them away.” (Wohlers) Recently there has been a boom in the development of natural farms and an increase in farmers markets across the country. If more people were to shop proven organic every month then the percentage of disease, cancers and illnesses would decrease rapidly. That is so the food companies can keep GMO’s a secret about the poison in your food. These corporations don’t want you to know what you 're consuming on a daily basis. Owning over eighty percent of the world food sources Monsanto can legally say whatever they want to on their food packaging such as “organic”, or “all natural”. This leads to confusion for the public who lives in cities and don 't have access to farmers market so are forced to shop as

In conclusion, GMO’s are better for us but labeling of them needs to be mandatory. Mandatory labeling will help many people when it comes to shopping. When the buyer of your product is happy then you are happy because you are making money making others happy. GMO’s need to be labeled and it need to be

GMOs would cause harm to the environments because by nurturing plants or growing livestock in surroundings that generally would not provide for them, there is the possibility of permanently destructing that habitat. This is frequently seen through GMO crossbreeding like weeds, which can be combined with GMO plants, can often become resistant to weedkillers, producing the need for more GMO efforts. There is no economic value because GMO foods go through just as long of a process to grow and fully develop, signifying that there is no actual financial worth to cultivating GMO foods when classed with non-GMO foods. Lastly, through time and time, studies have shown that the ingestion of GMO foods increases chances of food allergies in people such as if someone was to develop an allergy to soy due to GMO and then livestock consumed that GMO soy too, that individual would be highly likely of an allergic reaction from eating the animal

Farmers and scientists have been breeding plants with desirable traits for years to create the best crops. For example, look at all the many varieties of apples. However, when discussing GMOs you are also looking at test-tube meats, 3D printing and other genetically altered foods. “Using stem cells from a cows shoulder, Professor Mark Post of Maastricht University, created a burger that took 3 months to grow. Reports suggest the patty had a normal flavor, but had a dry texture” (Callen). Scientists believe that genetically modified food is a healthier way to produce exactly what the consumer needs to survive. Because our population is growing at a fast pace and we cannot control the climate change. Popular Science Magazine writer Brooke Borel states that, “Researchers from the University of Perugia in Italy published a review of one thousand seven hundred and eighty three GMO safety tests; seven hundred and seventy examined the health impact on humans or animals. They found no evidence that the foods are dangerous.” With our food supply diminishing by our fast, growing population GM Foods could be beneficial. Mass production and low costs seems sufficient and theoretically