The two books, The Pueblo Revolt of 1680 by Knaut and The World They Made Together by Sobel are essentially the same story. The authors tell of two different sets of people in two different places and times, but the natures of the encounters are remarkably similar. The authors take care to highlight the worldviews that were mashed together in seventeenth century New Mexico and in eighteenth century Virginia, and both authors talk about how worldview affected their respective subjects and decided the nature of the interactions between peoples. These are excellent books to compare because both are stories of one group of people subjugating another, and both are encounters that helped form the present day America. I will discuss what the readings …show more content…
They both wanted to increase their wealth, and both found people to force into labor. It is a classic pattern that has happened throughout human history and probably will continue to happen. What I like about The World They Made Together is that Sobel does not create an exaggerated image of what slavery in 17th century Virginia looked like. I know that there were many truly horrid people who mistreated their laborers with unspeakable cruelty, but that was not always the case. Sobel points out that there was slavery in Africa too, and that in Virginia, white laborers were often treated the same way as blacks. There is and always has been ethnocentrism. The slavery that took place in America was no different than other forms of slavery in other places and times, and in some cases, there were really good opportunities given to black laborers. The good opportunities often came in the form of housework, because it created a different kind of relationship between blacks and whites. Whenever there is a situation in which a group of people starts to rely on the labor of another, the inevitable result is that the laborers find themselves in a position of control. Some slave owners relied on their help so much that they would have starved to death without it because they forgot how to do the work that they made other people do for them. I believe the only way this kind of master-caregiver …show more content…
The Spanish tried to accomplish this with the use of friars that acted as middlemen between the Pueblos and the Spanish, but in the end, this strategy only caused problems for the Spanish. At least the Spanish understood that space between themselves and the Pueblos was important for the continuation of their dominion. The white Virginians did not even try to keep themselves separated from their slaves. They may have said that they were better, smarter, or separate in a moral capacity, but they opened up more than just their spaces to blacks; they put their children into the hands of those who they considered to be beneath them. Eventually, white dependence on blacks wore away at the space to such an extent that blacks had freedom even while they were in the bonds of slavery. The Spanish did not let the Pueblos into their spaces in the same way, but they did interbreed, and that served to break down divisions between the two. Another important factor the built up to the Pueblo revolt was the religion of the Pueblos. They were loath to part with what their worldview told them was true, and they continued their spiritual beliefs and traditional practices even through mass false conversions to Christianity. The strength with which the Pueblo people held to their beliefs was great enough to preserve ancient practices in spite of death threats from the Spanish. Separate religions helped to keep
It was either give in and follow a new religion, or reap the consequences and face death. Devastation struck as Spaniards forced their European way of life on the Native Americans. Those who chose to work with the Spaniards provided help and knowledge about the land, helping then expand, and giving them advice for the competition in grabbing land across the country (storyoftexas). The Spaniards however brought with them diseases that the Native Americans were not use to, and many died of small pox and other diseases (storyoftexas). Those who opposed the new comers were fought against and killed, showing other tribes that the Spaniards are more advanced and skilled than
One of the biggest fear of the upper class and the rulers of Virginia was the possibility of a combination of poor whites and black, since they were a much bigger population. There is a saying that America was “born free”, but that was really not the case. America was born with both free, master, landlord, rich and slave, servant, tenant, and
Plantation owners loved having indentured servants because it really helped them save every bit of money they could. Indentured servants did suffer a lot especially with their working schedules but, with the laws that were later passed in Virginia throughout the years and any few freedoms black had were taken away making them feel hopeless at times because of the racial diversity in the America’s at the time. Servants were being optimistic at the time, they were hoping the laws being passed would not affect their rewards for all the hard work they had endeavored throughout the four to seven year long contracts. There was many uncertainty especially with how society would treat them because of their skin color. With all these new laws being passed, most plantation owners feared for their land, indentured servants were not needed as much anymore, plantation owners turned to slavery were they had more power of the individuals and were guaranteed no profit
Throughout the seventeenth century, conflict between Europeans and Native Americans was rampant and constant. As more and more Europeans migrated to America, violence became increasingly consistent. This seemingly institutionalized pattern of conflict begs a question: Was conflict between Europeans and Native Americans inevitable? Kevin Kenny and Cynthia J. Van Zandt take opposing sides on the issue. Kevin Kenny asserts that William Penn’s vision for cordial relations with local Native Americans was destined for failure due to European colonists’ demands for privately owned land.
Krystin, The comparison about slavery by geographical location was a brilliant idea. It is dumbfounding to comprehend how human beings can treat each other. It is another element to understand how social surroundings cultivate the atmosphere for how certain people are treated in a set society. However, in the case of this dialogue, to comprehend how American North and South treated slaves.
Throughout the development of the colonies in America, slave trade grew to be a significant source of labor in primarily southern plantations within the late seventeenth to eighteenth centuries. During the era, with slaves being condemned to be considered socially inferior by law, and the increase in demand of goods such as rice and indigo, the slave labor force became a notable source for southern plantations in the eighteenth century. Slaves and people of color had always been considered to be socially inferior even before the colonies existed. With a sense of paternalism in Great Britain, people have always believed that those considered slaves,or servants rather, were second class citizens, and these people needed to be suppressed for their own best interests.
The book explains how at first, the black salves were similar to white servants. They worked together and were sometimes freed after a certain period. The whites and blacks hung out after work and often had kids. Few have stated that many masters in the South treated their slaves better than those up North. Some may say this because masters in the South saw their slaves as an investment, which makes prefect sense.
Before Europeans came to North America, It was populated by many different tribes of Indigenous peoples. These tribes, for the most part had their own political, economic, and military systems that were eventually changed and manipulated because of the invading nations. In the books A land so Strange and Jacksonland, we see through the eyes of Cabeza de Vaca and Andrew Jackson exactly how Indigenous people were at the very beginning, and the changes they had to undertake. Obviously the books show us the view of the Europeans rather than the Indigenous people themselves, but in certain recollections from people like John Ross we see their viewpoints and why they did certain things. From the information presented in both these books, it’s clear
In the 16th Century, Spain became one of the European forces to reckon with. To expand even further globally, Spanish conquistadors were sent abroad to discover lands, riches, and North America and its civilizations. When the Spanish and Native American groups met one another, they judged each other, as they were both unfamiliar with the people that stood before them. The Native American and Spanish views and opinions of one another are more similar than different because when meeting and getting to know each other, neither the Spaniards nor the Native Americans saw the other group of people as human. Both groups of people thought of one another as barbaric monsters and were confused and amazed by each other’s cultures.
The beginning of the 17th Century marked the practice of slavery which continued till next 250 years by the colonies and states in America. Slaves, mostly from Africa, worked in the production of tobacco and cotton crops. Later , they were employed or ‘enslaved’ by the whites as for the job of care takers of their houses. The practice of slavery also led the beginning of racism among the people of America. The blacks were restricted for all the basic and legally privileged rights.
The Spanish based their colonies on the promise of finding gold and possessing it, while the English Settlers based their colonies on the preaching of Christianity all while believing that the land they possessed and owned was how they would gain their liberty, independence, and ultimately their freedom. The Native Americans believed that the land belonged to not one person, but to a community instead; as long a you showed deep respect for it and cared for it as so mandated by the great spirit. Whether it be by the use of violence, religious education, or respect, every society and every person had different views on how the land and its resources should be
Prior to the English landing on the Eastern shores in 1607 of what is now known as the United States of America, Native Americans dominated areas from coast to coast [of the future nation]. Many of these tribes had built their own form of society, influenced by maternal dominance, agriculture, fishing, hunting, trade, and religion (Foner, Chapter 1).Unfortunately, their way of life was altered as soon as Europeans began emigrating and landing on the Americas, and began taking over the land Native Americans had possessed for centuries. Although weakened by a wave of disease, many tribes showed acts of resistance against their invaders, in disputes like the Pueblo Revolt, King Philip 's’ War, and Worcester v. Georgia. These acts of resistance
In the essay, Bowden goes on to explain the true meaning of the two religious systems and trying to make the Pueblo Revolt more
Although it was not an ideal situation to be in, it was much better than being a plantation slave. This document shows the relationship between the indigenous peoples and the African slave communities that has been established because of the trans-Atlantic slave trade. The relationship between these two communities would never have been established if it hadn't been for the slave trade. The two communities "allied together for common
The main difference that we see between both racial ethnic groups is that white Americans believed that they could strip Native Americans from their culture and civilize them while “nurture could not improve the nature of blacks” (67). Although some Native Americans did try to live under the laws of white Americans, they were eventually betrayed and forced to leave the