ipl-logo

When Was It Called The Constitutional Convention Of September 17, 1787

1474 Words6 Pages

On September 17, 1787 the Constitution was written. This event is also known as the Constitutional Convention. The Anti-Federalists and the Federalists, had different views on the Constitution, the Federalists had wanted the Constitution to be ratified with limited power of the government. Where as the Anti-Federalists had not wanted the Constitution to be ratified and wanted a compromise for this problem. For this conflict to have a compromise this is where the Bill of Rights came in. On September 25, 1789 the Bill of Rights was added with the Ten Amendments and finally proposed on December 15,1791.
Before all this had happened there had been the Constitution by the government. The Constitution was just the guidelines and the rules that …show more content…

The anti-federalist were the opposing party of the federalist disagreeing with the strong government. The anti-federalists had wanted a weaker government and had wanted individual rights for people by adding the bill of rights to the constitution.The anti-federalists were the type of political group who wanted rights for the people and for the United States, so everyone could have their individual rights as people.The anti-federalists believed that the federalists and the constitution was granting too much power to the federal courts at any expense. The Anti-federalists were arguing that the federal courts would be to far away to have justice for each average citizen.That is when the goal of the anti federalists was to stop the ratification of the constitution from …show more content…

The anti federalist wanted the individual rights or known as bill of rights to be added. So both anti federalists and federalists had bothe gotten what each party had wanted. The federalists had asked the anti federalists to vote for the constitution for it to be ratified and then the federalists would have the Bill of rights added to the constitution.At one point the anti federalists had gotten worried that the federalist would not add the bill of rights to the constitution.Both political parties had agreed on this, which came to this idea of a compromise for each side of the debate.
After each side had made a compromise more amendments had been added for good by the congress. On September 25, 1789 the First congress had finally proposed the twelve amendments to the constitution.The congress had passed the twelve amendments and provided the first original ten amendments to the constitution.The first ten amendments were referred as Bill of rights and

Show More
Related

  • How Did John Jay Help America Against Britain

    353 Words  | 2 Pages

    Congress passed 12 amendments, the states ratified 10. December 1791, the 10 amendments were added to the constitution and became, The Bill of Rights. In 1790, Hamilton proposed that the new government payed off their debt. Congress agreed to pay off their debts. A special district was laid out between Virginia and Maryland along the banks of the Potomac river, it was called Washington D.C. Native

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    468 Words  | 2 Pages

    After the Revolutionary War the thirteen colonies wanted a government to replace the British system they wanted overthrown. So they came up with the Articles of Confederation. The articles went into effect in 1781, but were short lived because they had too many flaws in them to work effectively. Even though they went into effect there was still a problem the colonies had and that was that they had no real national leadership.

    Read More

  • Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

    705 Words  | 3 Pages

    It took the convincing of the Anti-Federalists to explain how the Constitution gave too much power to the central government and did not state the rights and freedoms of the people, therefore lacking a Bill of Rights. The Federalists agreed to a Bill of Rights, and later the Constitution was ratified with nine out of thirteen votes on June 21 of 1788. Soon after the Constitution was ratified, the separation of powers was understood in the United States government. The separation of powers separated each branch of government.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of B. O. R.

    684 Words  | 3 Pages

    Apparently the Anti-Federalists thought that with the Constitution, they wouldn’t have any individual liberties. Unfortunately the Federalists didn’t see the problem with the Constitution. This is where compromise comes in. After the Federalists and Anti-Federalists discussed their ideas, each side gave up something they wanted in order to get something they did want. Finally after a long, long discussion both sides agreed on the amendments for the Bill of Rights.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Us Constitution Dbq Essay

    827 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Articles Of Confederation

    706 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Articles of Confederation were in need of a change. The document was a failure because the United States weren't able to raise money and pay for troops. The founder’s ideas of how the country should be ran all varied. The biggest disagreement was the representation of big vs. small states, this introduced two plans, the New Jersey and Virginia Plan. The New Jersey Plan, which was supported by the Anti-Federalists, supported small states while the Virginia Plan, which was supported by the Federalists, supported big states.

    Read More

  • Fourth Amendment Pros And Cons Essay

    562 Words  | 3 Pages

    Along time ago there was a king in England who would take colonists homes, put us in prison, and not tell us why. The king would take our guns which we needed to protect ourselves back then. We got into a war when we were trying to free ourselves from England. We won the war so we created a new government. But we wanted to have some rules the government has to follow so this new government doesn 't do the same thing the old garment did.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Dbq Essay

    755 Words  | 4 Pages

    In regards to having no Bill of Rights, James Madison and the Federal Government created the Bill of Rights under the first ten amendments to the Constitution. Amendments were changes to the

    Read More

  • Anti Federalists Dbq Essay

    456 Words  | 2 Pages

    The constitution that was written September 17, 1787 was poorly written with weaknesses. The Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of oppression. The Weaknesses of the Articles

    Read More

  • Bill Of Rights Vs Anti-Feds

    244 Words  | 1 Pages

    Introduction: The Bill of Rights was created as a compromise between the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Due to how old the document is the Supreme Court often has to reinterpret their meaning when adjusting the laws to better fit the ever changing landscape of modern day America. Woot-woot. Feds believed in strong government while Anti-Feds believe in a more local government.

    Read More

  • The Anti-Federalists

    730 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Anti-Federalist’s view of government about having a federal government where the states have more power rather than to have a central government was justified. The Anti-federalists wanted to ensure the protection of individual rights along with allowing the states to have the role of checking and balancing each other. Although their inspiration was the Articles of Confederation, their main goal was to make a few adjustments along with adding a Bill of Rights to secure the citizens’ rights for many generations to come. Federalists, people who supported the Constitution, sided with having a central government. They had the determination to have the Constitution ratified.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

    585 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Federalist main argument was stated based off the opinion that the government would never have complete power over the citizens, but the citizens would also have a little more power and a say in the things that involve them. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists believed in limited powers specifically stated, they wanted strong state governments, and wanted a Bill of Rights added to the Constitution to protect the people from the government (Document 4). This was their point of view due to the fact that they believed that the individual states know and can act more based on their people that on federal government can. They focused their argument on the rights of the citizens. For the Federalists and Anti-Federalists to agree on a new government, they created a compromise that combined each of their ideas.

    Read More

  • Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

    494 Words  | 2 Pages

    They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

    Read More

  • Differences And Similarities Between Anti-Federalists And Anti-Federalists

    622 Words  | 3 Pages

    Federalists and Anti-Federalists had opposing views in the Constitution because of their differences; but they also had many similarities that ended up leading to the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists and Federalist had many similarities. Both were supportive of this new country and knew that they needed a government. They both wanted the congress to have power to create war and to create treaties.

    Read More

  • Robert Yates Anti Federalist 17 Summary

    445 Words  | 2 Pages

    The author of anti-federalist 17# was Robert Yates (not the serial killer), at the time he was a politician and judge also the oldest of his family. he lived in the state of New York and tried to run for governor. The document yates wrote was just about states that the anti-federalists did not desire a constitution as a result of they felt that it 'd offer the central government an excessive amount of power which it 'd remove all power from the states. "to raise and support armies at pleasure, in addition in peace as in war, and their management over the militia, tend not solely to a consolidation of the govt. , however the destruction of liberty..." a stronger central government would higher shield everybody and is additional for the good

    Read More

More about When Was It Called The Constitutional Convention Of September 17, 1787

Open Document