Dogs are a mans best friend. The book Where The Red Fern Grows is about a young boy named Billy as he goes on exciting adventures with his two dogs Old dan and Little ann. Billy never knew how much his dogs loved him until one night that something terrible happened. Old dan and Little ann are some of the most fine,loving,and smart hounds you’ll ever meet. Come as we learn what achievements and obstacles Billy goes through with and without Little ann and Old dan. First we will talk about what obstacles and achievement billy went through in the book. One obstacle Billy faced during the book is that his mom was scared he would get hurt and didn't want him to go hunting. Billy didn't want to wait so he went across the mountains to tahlequah to get old dan and Little ann. When they got back to the ozark mountain Billy had found the names that he was going to name his dog engraved in a tree the dogs were …show more content…
In the movie it there are two sister. The movie was a lot like the book and a lot different at the same time but that for the next paragraph. In the movie billy was given the gold cup and he never won the silver cup. Little ann and Old dan weren't running around and they didn't have snow on them during the blizzard. Finally i will be talking about the similarities and differences between the book and movie. One of the differences is that in the book Billy had three sister and in the movie Billy had two sisters. One similarity is the names of the characters. In the book hunting was at night and in the movie hunting was in the daytime. Both in the movie and in the book Billy found the names Little ann and Old dan engraved in a tree. In conclusion i will be telling if i like either the book or movie better. I think the book was better. The book shows more emotion and feelings than in the movie. The movie didn't show half the stuff that went on in the book. The movie shows no feelings or
Billy worked hard to save up for two hunting dogs. He trained his dogs to be the best coon hounds in the Ozarks. Lots of exciting events occured in this book for example when a mountain lion got into a fight with the dogs. Or when one of the boys that he made a bet with dies. There are many other tragic things about the book but in my opinion the movie was better.
Another similarity I found between the book and the movie was how the Landlady gave Billy the tea. This is an important event that had to be in the text and film because the tea is poison and that is how she kills him to be stuffed. Also, in the film and text, the Landlady
In my opinion there are a lot of comparisons between the film and the book, but there are also differences between them too, but also they have impacted the audience in both the film and the
The family had a nice structure in both. The same as the movie and book, they both had the grandparents in bed. Different from the book that has a dad, the movie does not have a dad. The Oompa Loompas were also unique. Similar to the movie, both described and showed the Oompa Loompas were small.
It had more narration so the reader could understand what is happening. Secondly, the movie. The movie was different than the book. It had some parts that were in the book, but it lacked some details.
Another difference is that in the movie they go into town, but in the book it 's never mentioned. Something else that was different was that in the book the mood was happy most of the time, while in the movie the mood was sad. A difference between the book and the movie is that in the book momma was going to burn Byron, but in the movie she does not burn him. A big difference is that in the
The movie has a different story structure. Unlike the book the movie has some flashbacks. Some differences are that she walks in oh the man in the beginning. The tells his wife in the movie that he is having an affair with another woman. The story clerk does not offer the woman cheesecake in the book.
Yes, the basics of the plot are similar, but in the movie, there are changed details, mainly like missing scenes in the movie that the book originally had, or simplified events. In the movie, there was an additional girl character that was not in the book. The house Moon eventually came to at the end of the story was supposed to be a brick house. Some of the things the characters in the movie said were a bit different from what was said in the book. Things like that.
This part in the book was fascinating to read because you didn't know what would happen next, for example there was a snowstorm that happened during the championships. (pg # 95-112) The last point I have to prove the settings in the novel were better is that In the movie Billy just goes to the station and gets his dog and arrives home. In the movie this part does not have much detail and information, for example in the book when Billy's on his way home he comes across a school he finally got to see what a school looked like. When Billy crosses the school and gets bullied and beaten up by a few kids.
The Nightjohn movie was very different from the book. One reason that it was so different is because of how much the Wallers are talked about. In the book they only talk about the Wallers when slaves are being punished. In the movie, they were shown much more. The Wallers don’t have kids in the book.
There are some similarities and some differences between the two. First off what happens in the book is that billy begs for two coonhounds. After he finds an advertisement from an old magazine he does odd jobs for people to get some extra money. He saves up every money he gets and after months of saving he gets enough money to get the two hounds. He goes to his grandpa’s store to ask him if he can order them.
There are details left out of the movie that were in the book, the movie doesn 't demonstrate the ongoing theme of hunger as well as the book does, and the the movie does a better job with
The first one that I will address is that in the play the Van Daans are already in the Annex when the Franks arrive, but in the movie, the Franks are already in the Annex and had been there for a while when the Van Daans arrived. The next difference is that in the play Peter knocks over a lamp when the robbers are downstairs, but in the movie, Peter does not knock over the lamp while the robbers are down stairs. In the movie Anne has more of a romantic relationship with Peter, but in the book it is more of just a friendly relationship. In the book Anne and Peter do not have a good relationship. It is just Anne teasing Peter, but in the movie they are friends early on.
Since Thomas is a lot more passive in the novel his stories are more easily understood. The biggest similarity in the book had to be the plot line where Victor's father dies in Arizona and he needed the help of Thomas to pick up his ashes. The difference is how they traveled to Arizona, in the film it was by bus in the novel it was by plane. Another difference in the amount of money Victor was given in the film he says his mother gave him fourth dollars in the novel he was given one hundred by the tribe. All in all the largest difference would be the origination
I enjoyed the movie better than the book. It included just the right amount of action scenes, description words, and details from the story. The story was amazing but I like seeing things more than reading them. I usually like the movies better than the book.