Why did the North the war? What would one do to help assist their side to win a war? Maybe one would make sure they have all an abundance of food and weapons so they would never run out. Perhaps one would get a large army. They could even have a plan of all the strategies in a battle to prepare themselves on how they attack the other side. In the Civil War, the north had done all of these tactics to defeat the South. They had some setbacks during some battles, but ended up pulling through and winning. The North won the war by having a larger army than the South, by being the more prepared with their supplies, and by utilizing the Anaconda plan. Having a larger army helped the North win the Civil War in many ways. When the North had more men than the other side, they can have a little more room for causalities …show more content…
Having a larger army meant that the North had more men to fight in all the battles that they will compete against in during the war. The North had nearing doubled the size of the South so it was harder for the South to compete against such a large army. The North was more prepared in getting supplies from their factories. The South had way less more factories and workers then the North did so they could not make and send out the supplies and/or food to the South as fast as the North could. The Anaconda plan was designed to block the Mississippi River to try to stop all supplies that are coming to the South. This resulted in the South not getting any more supplies so they will only have to work with a limited amount of supplies. The South then could not fight any longer so they had to surrender and let the North take the win. These are not the only reasons why the North won the war but they are big reason that helped them defeat the
It also gave the Union control of the Mississippi River. The Battle of Vicksburg was one of the most important Battles of the Civil War, and it helped speed up the end of the long fought war. It also let the north go into the deep south so they could eradicate the “Rebels”. It split the Confederacy in half. It made it easier to defeat the “Rebels” when they were not able to communicate with their other half.
To keep the confederacy and maintain slavery. 2. Describe the Northern/Union advantages and disadvantages during the Civil War. More fighting men
The North had a huge army far too big for the south to defeat and both sides knew that the North had all the supplies and resources necessary to win the war and end slavery. The Northern people knew they would win the war and talked about how life would change for the better, before the war ever ended. For example the passage “Fredrick Douglass” states, “When the war is over, the country is saved, peace is established, and the black man's rights are secured, as they will be, history With an impartial hand will dispose of that and sundry other questions”(Douglass, 481). Therefore the confidence the North had may have helped them win the
The North had many advantages. They beat the South in population they could draw soldiers from. The North had 22 million citizens where the South only had 5.5 million citizens. The North could transport supplies and people faster because of their roads, canals, and railroads. However the South disconnected from itself with barely any railroads and hard to move soldiers and goods from place to place.
Already they were at an advantage number-wise. As if this were not already enough, the Union also had clever, sly generals in place. Throughout the war, the Union continued to build railroads, they used this to their advantage. By using these new railroads, it became far easier to distribute rations and weapons to the Union soldiers. Furthermore, the Union used an anaconda tactic, which stopped the Confederate rations from getting to their soldiers.
I think that the greatest advantage that the north had was the numbers and the industrialization. If the south had the same access to the industrialization that the north had as well as the amount of people then I that there could have been a different outcome to the war. The south knew the topography and the weather conditions of the land where the battles were being fought. If they were able to employ the same type of force like the north had they would have had a better chance at winning the war. But since they did not see the point in taking the industrialization as serious as the north did since they were making such good profits from agriculture in my opinion they did not have a good chance at winning the war from the
Even though by the end of the Civil War each side had lost thousands of their men, and much of their morale, both the Union and the Confederate States of America had advantages through the beginning years of the war. The North had many advantages over the South. For one, the North had more dominance over the CSA in relation to the available resources for war. Because most factories were located inside the remaining states of the Union, the North could manufacture and produce their own supplies for war while the South was less privileged in this sense.
One the other hand, the Union had economic control. The north had become highly industrialized at this time and could easily overpower the Confederate military, owing to the fact that
The Union had more railroad lines and they had the telegraph system. The telegraph system was a huge advantage for the Union because they could now send messages thousands of miles away in less than a minute. President Abraham Lincoln could now command the Union’s generals in the safety of his own office. The railroad lines gave the Union a big advantage because they could transport resources faster than the Confederate
The economic impact of the war as is true in most if not all cases of war are that the spoils of war are the reward of the victors. The South was already in a weaker position in the industrial strength of its geographical coalition that it was amazing that they were as close to actually succeeding in their mission. They lacked the ability to replenish their troops with guns and ammunition and in many cases had to gather this gear from failed Confederate and Union soldiers. While in the north with a large population and a more sustained economy they were to accomplish the
Losses because the South lost more soldiers than the north. For these reasons Gettysburg was a major turning point in the Civil
The North had an excellent Navy that had the ability to blockade things that were headed to the Southern states. The South desperately needed food, weapons, and ammunition but weren’t able to get their supplies because the North had blockades that stopped the supplies they needed. The North also had gun factories, shipyards, and coal readily available at anytime which puts them at a huge advantage over the South. They had more money and were just more advanced in their industry, which helped them win the civil war.
One, in particular, would be the North’s abundance of soldiers. Edwin C. Bearss claims, “The South lost the Civil War because of a number of factors. It was inherently weaker in the various essentials to win a military victory in the North. The north had a population of more than twenty-two million people to the South’s nine and a half million of whom four and a half million were slaves”. With the North having more people to go to war with, it was clear their army would be able to defeat the South.
This including the electing of Abraham Lincoln made the southern states feel like they were going to lose control of the political choices in the southern territories, which would have lead to them not having control over their area in general (American Civil War History). These events are all effects where the underlying problem was the conflict of slavery that was between the north and south states. Showing how much of a factor it was during the civil war era. Making it one of the largest causes of why the civil war broke
The Southern and Northern states differentiate on many issues, which ultimately led them towards a Civil War. There stood deep social, economic, and political disparities between the North and the South. These modifications stemmed from the understanding of the United States Constitution on both sides. In the end, most of these disputes about the rights of states directed to the Civil War. There existed reasons other than slavery on behalf of the South 's breakaway.