Advantages Of The North In The Civil War

The North would get the raw material from the South and turn it into finished goods. In doing this they made good money. Even with making good money the North still only gave the South little amounts. The South got mad because they wanted more money and thought they deserved more money because they are the ones who are giving the North the product. Without them the North couldn’t make the money they are.

Though it may not have had as many battles or not garner much historical attention, the New Mexico Territory played a crucial asset to whichever side controlled the land. Because of its often overlooked usefulness, the Territory helped the Union win the American Civil War and allow the United States to today become the true land of the

This advantage allowed the colonists to have lesser casualties as opposed to their enemies. Since America had a large territory, the remaining troops would have to wait months at a time for other troops to arrive at the port. Colonists then would use that time to attack the remaining English troops.

Additionally, despite the fact that the Union had more resources and a better equipped army, the Confederacy was able to better arm and supply itself and take advantage of the Union resources by capturing the Union’s regional supply depot during the battle. To my mind, two compelling questions regarding the Second Battle of Bull Run would be ‘If the union armies had been cohesive, instead of separating into two separate groups, and had a better understanding of the local terrain at Bull Run would they have been able to be victorious?’, and ‘If the Southern States had been a bit more powerful economically, given the battlefield superiority of their generals such as Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson, would the south have won the civil war? If so, what would the USA look like

The southerners had an advantage of the land mass they owned, so it was easier for them because there people knew the land and this made it harder for the people who didn 't. While the swamps and forest were known by the people of the south but in the west the great river were used as the union 's supply routes. The geographic features of the land were both advantages and extremely unhelpful to both sides. The north had more industry and was far wealthier giving it a huge advantage to the north. On top of that the north had two million men fighting against the the south 's with just 900,000. As quoted from www.markedbyteachers.com/as.../why-did-the-south-lose-the-american-civil-war.html “ Troop levels, army supply and the finance of the war all played a major role in which side was to win the war.”.

For example, Friedrich Engels, co founder of Marxism, believed agriculture the direct cause for a loss of political innocence (Noble or Savage 2). Others argue that agricultural came as a great success for the survival of the human race, and believe it to be crucially beneficial to the development of humanity. Both arguments have their flaws and strengths, however, evidence suggests that the Agricultural Revolution benefited humanity from the perspective of a larger group, but came as a deficit to humanity from the perspective of the individual human. Because

The National Banking Act strengthened the Union economy and funded the war. It stabilized the Union economy by creating a centralized banking system, and successfully funded the war by decreasing federal debt and reducing inflation. If the National Banking Act had not been enacted, then the Union would not have had so much economic support for the war. Since the Confederacy’s strategy was to outlast the Union, they would have had better success if the Union did not have the strong economy and funding created by the National Banking

If the South was allowed to secede both countries would have advanced more. The South probably would not be in debt because the North was paying people and the North wouldn’t have to pay for Southern expenses. The North could’ve had their own President and the South wouldn’t care because we were independent and Abraham Lincoln was a main reason the South wanted to secede. Also, the North could fight their own wars and the South didn’t have to get involved because the North had many disputes with other countries but the South could save their army without the North using it. The South could have been a successful nation without the

Another advantage that was not as important was that the United States gained for land for farming and natural resources. An opposing disadvantage to the gaining of Louisiana, America had to defend and protect land double its original size before the purchase.  We are being honest the purchase of Louisiana was not constitutional the Jefferson want to gets his beliefs and bought Louisiana anyway. This leaves the United States with more land, and more land means, more managing and protecting.

The disadvantage of the South’s industry would play a role in the Civil War later. Currency was also an advantage for the North. Due to the booming industrial North, the value of its goods were high and with its strong financial advantages it stayed that way. The south had a disadvantage because of its agricultural ways. This did not create the demand for as much capital or currency circulation.

The colonists won the War for Independence due to their superior tactics and soldiering. We won the war because the people of that time had the will to fight. We mainly won the war because of the French. Until the French decided to give aid, our soldiers most likely did not have enough weapons and ammunition. I imagine that there would have been more battles like Breed 's Hill without them.

The reason is because if congress didn 't agree to the expansions then they would not expand their land. Jefferson was a major factor of motivating the push for expansion, not only did he tell the people he wanted to expand but made sure people did by lowering the prices for land. This made more people want live out there and want to expand there land as well. Another factor was John L. O’Sullivan’s document on Manifest Destiny which stated, “America is destined for better deeds…..

“If there were no consumers of slave-produce there would be no slaves” was an insight that gave free produce advocates an understanding of the role of consumers in economic activity.5The increase in the North’s population affected the demand for resources such as clothes. Despite the North’s disapproval of the “Peculiar Institution” or the slave system, the increase in demand of products left the North no choice but to rely on the production of cotton from the South, which was crucial to the textile industry. The North’s reliance on the South’s plantations did little to help abolish slavery but instead fueled it. White

Why did the North the war?                What would one do to help assist their side to win a war? Maybe one would make sure they have all an abundance of food and weapons so they would never run out.   Perhaps one would get a large army.

I believe there were some similarities in the Civil War between The North and The South, but there were also a lot of differences with technology, and The North had the advantage. In the Spring of 1861, decades of simmering tensions between the northern and southern united states over issues including states rights versus federal authority, westward expansion and slavery exploded into the American Civil War(1861-1865). The election of the anti-slavery Republican Abraham Lincoln as president in 1860 caused seven states to secede. (Causes)