Money, everyone loves it, everyone also has the chance and opportunity in life to support themselves and make their own source of money. Recently though there have been debates and raising questions about whether or not students should have the opportunity to gain money from doing well in school. Students get paid for good grades is a high debate that has gone on in the past, and is yet again making another comeback to continue its settlement against the argument. Although the idea of students getting paid for good grades may seem good and encouraging at first there will always be the cons that out flaw it, such as the lines that students will cross to get their rewards or payments from the school. This is why this topic is always so debated because of the mixed opinions and evidence backing up both sides of the argument which always leaves it to a mutual pause of discussion. The first reason that students getting paid for doing well in school is not the best idea, because of the fact that it will bring cheating to arise and students will take advantage of the system trying to get the most out of it unfairly. There are some goods in this and one of the good reasons that this may be beneficial is because it would allow for students to have something to work towards leading them …show more content…
Many people think that paying students for doing well in school are misled or bias due to them being current students in the school system or not have realized the cons or negatives that come along with rewarding students. There are also a lot of cons to this system while it also has its benefits in encouraging students to do their best work possible, but while this is happening there will always be the risk of people cheating. While there are others taking advantage of exploiting the system's purpose in
The Changes of Segregation “I have a dream” Martin Luther King Jr.. MLK jr. protested on how African Americans (blacks) were treated, for example they couldn’t go to certain place without getting arrested or beaten up. Without Martin, Kids wouldn’t be able to go to school, parents get jobs, or even go out in some public places without getting arrested! How would it feel if someone couldn’t go to school just because of what color skin he/she had?
Dr. Steve Chen, an educator in Sport Management at Morehead University and author of "Ought to Student-Athletes Get Paid", feels the same way with regards to paying school competitors. Chen trusts that scholastics are the primary motivation behind school. He feels that a school 's essential target is to give understudies a quality training that sets them up to be furnished with the instruments to make due in this present reality. Paying competitors would remove the understudy from understudy competitor and that would crush the reason for a school 's fundamental target. Competitors don 't understand the significance of the instruction they are acquiring while they play their game and that is the reason they ought not get paid, it is not an occupation rather only
Let’s face it some schools have more money set to sports than others. So if college athletes started getting paid some schools would be better off than others. Lets say that a kid from Sioux Falls that excels at football decides he wants to play football in college. If student athletes got paid that student would be more likely to play at a school like Alabama versus a smaller school closer to home that wouldn’t pay him quite as much like University of South Dakota.
Some students could really use the extra help by getting money when their playing and working hard on their favorite sport. Students that are attending college have already worked so hard to get through all of their school years, so I believe they deserve this. Also, college is already very expensive for most students attending. This would help them out a lot.
In ‘What gets students motivated to work harder? Not money’ by Matthew G. Springer, he explains how many use money to motivate children to work hard and how it doesn’t actually work. To prove this he will use his status and credibility, his information and statistics, and emotions to get us, the readers, to side with him. In his argument Springer uses ethos, logos and pathos to get you to lean towards his side.
High school athletes go through career ending experiences everyday 22% of these are mental and the vast majority are physical and the majority of the time these experiences are for nothing. The majority of people don’t think that high school athletes should be paid because of how the amount of time students put into school vs sports would change dramatically, but some students are already getting paid for their academics. These students also have seen better improvements in the classroom, so if we were to reward athletes in the same way then maybe their performance in both sports and school would improve due to the fact that they would begin to put the max amount of effort into their assignments so they can play in the sports. High School
students would try their hardest but still wouldn 't get acknowledged for the hard work they’ve overcome. Now they have to struggle to find a job that at least pays good money to support a family. People are suffering just to support their family and have the necessities they need. No matter how hard they try to succeed, it’s not good
For example,“When you pay student athletes a share of what they contribute to the college sports programs, they'll want to work harder and do better. ”(3 reasons why collage athletes get payed pg 1) It is clear to see that if kids get payed they will do better. Also if they get payed they would want to do better because they migh want to bring money home and help there family and him. Even if the kids dont get payed they might want to quit and not do as good or work as hard.
There has been no studies on paying for good grades can badly affect us. That 's why parents should pay us for good grades and like I said before if we get paid we will get better grades and have a better attitude towards school and think of it as an actual job. So that 's why I believe that we should pay students for good
How does the idea of college athletes getting paid sound? The benefits of this is that it can help athletes support their family. Another benefit is players could stay longer in school. But their is some cons, like financial irresponsibility and unfair competition between players. So by doing this you could be facing pros and cons.
Did you know that paying students for having good grades resulted in a decrease in dropout rates, gangs, alcohol, and drug use? Students should get paid for having excellent grades. The reason why this is important is because it could lead to a brighter future for society. Three reasons why students should get paid for having awesome grades is because cash for good grades provide students with career-like rewards, it decreases dropout rates, and with the right incentive,could lead to success. All of those three reasons could and will result in success.
When considering the choice of paying students for good grades and not paying students for good grades, the choice should definitely be, students should not be paid for good grades. Paying students for good grades may start off their youth incorrectly. Instead of focusing on getting an education, the reward of money is likely to block their priorities. Students will be angry when not given the money, and not being able to raise test scores or grades. In order for a bright and successful future, students should not be paid for good
Now, before you tell me that school is different. It isn’t. If we can teach our young-athletes that participating is enough to be rewarded, can we not expect the same inside the classroom, or later down the line in the workplace? If your child receives the lowest possible mark on a test, would you want them to be rewarded with stickers on the sheet? I can’t speak for every parent, but I am sure the majority would want their kids to smarten up and work harder at the task.
Students shouldn't have to pay for college, should they? No they shouldn't. Many smart kids who are more likely to succeed have little money and cannot afford college. More kids would go to college, also students would have more freedom to choose what they really wanted to do.
“A teacher affects eternity; he can never tell where his influence stops” states Henry Brooks Adams, a historian, educator, and author. In today’s society, teachers are undervalued and underappreciated for the huge part that they play in a child, teenager, and adult’s life. Teachers should be paid more because they contribute more to the future of the world than any other career, help students psychologically and financially, and most students in a survey chose that teachers need to be paid more than their annual salary. Teachers contribute more to the future of the world than any other career. They teach students social and intellectual skills needed to be an effective member of society.