There are some student-athletes who are actually struggling right now with this problem. What should the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) do? Due to their hard work, time and risk of injuries, college athletes should be paid. Even if the NCAA or their own colleges can’t pay them too much, they deserve to be paid even just a little. It would be really helpful for some students to get some extra money.
Remember back then when teachers made us pick our college,and we were obsessed that we even made posters etc. So now that you are in college in the college you dreamed to go , now is your responsibility to represent your college either playing a sport or something else. Now think about what college you go to represent you will have to represent your mascot to . if the sport they are playing does not make them rich or famous is because they did not put too much dedication. “But the players or athletes who are good and entertain us those are the ones who will get paid”-source B.
As we all know, college can be very expensive. With the scholarships and grants, college student-athletes can go to school for free and get their day-to-day needs such as food, housing, clothes, etc. Ackerman and Scotts, purpose is to show that college is a learning experience and with the help of college sports, the student-athletes will have a chance to grow and be successful in life rather than being exploited. However, critics believe that college student-athletes should be paid salary, like professional athletes, because they want people to see the “athletes are the rule, not the expectation” (par 11). They want the audience to think that it’s a rule for student-athletes to go play pro after two years, will no expectation.
Furthermore, the decision to start paying the athletes not only would create a even playing field that has typically been swayed toward the universities. Stipends are needed to control how much is allocated, but that itself will be the spark that is needed. This is important because the relationship between the NCAA and their athletes are like any other employer its employee; employer should pay the employee what they are worth, not just what they feel is equal. The NCAA has duplicated the structure that held many people down in the 1800’s - slavery. They earn the massive income as the laborers (athlete) settle for pennies.
The argument made by these two professors state that Division 1 players qualify as employees under Federal Labor Laws. Since players are under this law, the McCormick’s feel players should get financially compensated due to the physical rigors and balance education simultaneously (Cooper, 2011). It’s unbelievable how this couple thinks Division 1 athletes should get paid. The privilege to attend a university that is costly on full scholarship should be more than enough. Furthermore, student-athletes received stipends as an allowance assist with their livelihood.
Some college athletes are just as well known as pro players which is one of the arguments for why they should be paid. Although some athletes are very well known the purpose of college is to a student first. Which is why the top tier players can wait for professional sports to be paid, and while in college they can students. Another argument for why athletes should be paid is because there is already lots of under the table deals that take place with college athletes. Under the table deals will only hurt the athlete in the long run.
College athletics are an exciting experience for many. Student athletes put in time and work to prepare for game day while fans anticipate to watch from the stands or their TVs. In the article, "College Athletes Should Be Paid," by Ann Kaufmann, she argues that student athletes should be paid because they are so profitable, yet they don 't receive a dime of what they make for their college. But these students are just that, students. Since these athletes receive athletic scholarships, are not professionals, and pose a threat to other school programs to be paid, should they really receive a salary for what they
If they stay in college, they will have more stability in the future since they will have more money. They should stay in college since they will be preparing for the future and it will show them how to become more independent. Many may say that students should drop out because college is costly. This is true, but they will have a much better life if they stay in
This is a big issue today in college sports. The NCAA thinks coaches are paying top ranked high school players to go play for their team. While others get caught some hide and disagree when suspected of such a thing. That is what makes this book interesting, seeing how things work inside these leagues. If you are one of those
Being able to juggle both school and a sport is a lot of pressure and takes a lot of hard work and dedication. For all the hard work and dedication, a college athlete put in they should be reward for that. College athletes deserve to get paid
My first reason is that the kids get stressed about handling sports, a job, and school. Recent studies say 1 out of 4 athletes get stressed from juggling all those responsibilities. Expert Andy Schwarz say “paying kids for athletics would cut down on 50 percent of that stress.” An article from Debate Club supports my opinion and “The huge amount of money being made off college sports has led some to question whether student-athletes can be considered amateurs any longer, and whether they
Between Tv deals, ticket sales, and jersey sales there is plenty of money to go around in college athletics, and it is time that the NCAA steps up and compensates athletes. College athletes are stuck in a brief conflict where they think they deserve to be paid just like the pros do. They consider their sport as a job and think they deserve to be paid just like the coaches do. Colleges make a lot of their money through the sports department. Ticket sales are a big way colleges bring in big money.