Working Students Thesis

CHAPTER IV
PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPREATION OF DATA This chapter presents the interpretations and analysis of data and information gathered by the researchers. The data needed for the study has been gathered and presented in tables. The researchers attempted to answer the problems stated in chapter I.

1. Profile of the Respondents 1.1 Age
Table 1
Frequency and Percent Distribution of the Respondents by Age
AGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
17 15 15%
18 16 16%
19 29 29%
20 20 20%
21 12 12%
22 4 4%
23 3 3%
24 1 1%
TOTAL 100 100%

Table 1 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of the respondents according to their age. The age ranges from seventeen to twenty-four (17-24) years old. This may be explained by the fact that the Philippine

The number of students working inside the campus is higher compared to the working students working outside the campus. This is because it is easier to get hired in a university the students are in that look for a job out side the campus with a much more number of unemployed that is also looking for jobs. Companies hire college-degree holders even for part-timers that make it hard for students to look for jobs outside the campus (Mendoza,

General Trait of the UE College Working Students
Table 6
General Trait of the College Working Students
Traits Courage Persistence Honesty Wisdom
Mean 1.35 1.41 1.31 1.15

Table 6 shows the general trait of the college working students. The trait wisdom got a mean of 1.15 which is the highest among the four traits. Based on the results, the trait wisdom is the general trait of the college working students. College working students have more experiences compared to full-time students. This is because different environments were learned by college working students simultaneaously. The trait wisdom is the general trait of these students because their experiences mold the college working students. It is possible that life experiences of these college working students can be accountable to wisdom (Heyboer, 2014).
4. The Significant Relationship of Positive Individual Traits with the Profile Variables of the Respondents

Table 7
Significant Relationship by Sex
d.f. Obtained Value Critical Value Verbal Interpretation
1 1.47 3.841 No Significant