Fox News is one of the most famous channels in America with millions of viewers. Since 1996 when you and Roger Ailes started the news channel, it has been growing fast and furiously over two decades. It has served as a great media for American audience with its quality news report and extensive coverage of information during the time of controversies. However, Fox New Channel has been accused for biased reporting and delivering one-sided political opinion over the years, too. For a news channel, having a bad reputation for biased content is critical to its credibility. As The New York Times pointed out, your channel has broadcasted Mitt Romney’s speech for more than two hours while Obama’s speech was only thirty minutes, and your confidence …show more content…
The terrorist attack is aimed to create fear and intimidation, and it is rapidly increasing with the advent of ISIS. The most well-known and brutal terrorist attack was 9/11, and the overall reaction to the terror has drastically changed after the event. The impact was strong and long lasting. Even the daily life, art, music, and politics have been widely influenced by the fear and resentment. Consequently, public, especially Americans immediately connect the word ‘terror’ with the emotion and experience of 9/11. However, the Fox News seems to be using the word more than other news channel. For example, when I searched ‘shooting’ on Fox News website, I found 36,457 results, and most of them happened in the U.S., but I found 43,007 while most of the incidents happened outside of the U.S. (Fox News). In addition, when I searched San Bernardino on Google, the major news channel labeled it as a shooting or mass shooting, while Fox News often used the term ‘terror’ and ‘terrorist’ to describe the …show more content…
Although the fox news can grab audience’s attention by using a strong term like ‘terror’, it seems like the term has been overused. Sensational terms can alter the public’s mood and disturb the society with fear. To be more specific, Roland von Känel from Neuropsychosomatic and Stress Biology Research Group in Switzerland wrote in the article that “that about one in five victims who survive a terrorist attack will develop posttraumatic stress disorder that is characterized by symptoms such as intrusive memories and nightmares of the violent act, feeling emotionally numb and easily startled” (1248). That being said, reminding the victims who has survived from terrorist attack with unnecessary use of the term will stir their mental instability. Furthermore, the emotional stress from terrorist acts can cause “acute increases in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure, constriction of heart vessels, inflammation activation, and thickening of the blood, all of which underlie the triggering of a heart attack and sudden death” (1248). Some of these diseases are critical to one’s life. As a consequence, the term ‘terror’ should not be
A great terror struck our nation September 11, 2001, two aircraft’s hit the world trade centers, killing 2000 people and injuring over twice as many. A third aircraft flew into the Pentagon while a fourth crashed in a rural area in Pennsylvania. This day will forever be engrained into history as one of the worst terror attacks faced in this nation. Nearly three years later, in an attempt to figure out what happened on that tragic day, scholars came together to discuss the possible parallels between foreign and domestic terrorist. The author, Michael Kimmel, outlines the possible cause of the 2001 attacks and offers us a link between both foreign and domestic terrorism.
“9/11 changed America fundamentally, far more so than outsiders realized at the time. For Americans it genuinely was a new Pearl Harbour, an attack on the homeland that made them feel vulnerable for the first time in 60 years,” (Powell, 2003). The terrorist attacks of 9/11 affect America today because they instigated the creation of the Department of Homeland Security and the “War on Terror,” and led to an increase in anti-Muslim hate crimes. “Often referred to as 9/11, the attacks resulted in extensive death and destruction, triggering major U.S. initiatives to combat terrorism and defining the presidency of George W. Bush,” (9/11, 2010). The most noticeable of these effects was the creation of the Department of Homeland Security.
In Richard Kearney’s article “Terror, Philosophy and The Sublime”, he begins with the statement “how can we understand the ‘terror’ of September 11th?” (23), Kearney begins to summarize the event of September 11th and the decision the United States made after the attack. In his second paragraph he relates his own experience from visiting a exhibition about “Terrors and Wonders” showing the representation of different monsters and how we see them today. Kearney uses his personal experience by trying to understand the “terror” of September 11th along with extensive research to show his credibility. The rhetorical appeals of logos, pathos and ethos creates an argument showing readers how we as americans are able to get through a monstrous situation.
Before the terrible event of 9/11 many United States citizens could agree that they felt generally safe living in the U.S. People could live their lives and not worry about an attack against them or their love ones. Everyone was friendly and opened to each other because there was no fear. But, unfortunately the views of everyday living have changed as a result of the attacks on the United States. The continued threat of terrorism has affected the lives of Americans in negative ways. 9/11 has made a big impact and has effected U.S citizens for many reasons.
A date that has gone down infamously in America’s history is the tragic event that occurred on September 11, 2001. This date was a turning point in the world, and many changes could be seen, such as the addition of the TSA in airports and increased security. However, one of the lesser known effects was the sense of fear that was unconsciously instilled within our communities. Today, this fear is represented through our heightened awareness towards terrorism, and the increased distance we tend to place between ourselves and our fellow community members. While 9/11 was a day most noted for its horrific display of terror and the loss of many lives, it was also the day that we, as a nation, lost our sense of security and replaced it with a sense
Nearly the whole country watched in horror on the morning of September 11, 2001. As the planes crashed and the towers burned, many thought it simply wasn’t true. They believed that it was impossible that someone could hate America that much. It was true, and it left lasting effects on Americans everywhere. Al-Qaeda had carried out a plan so horrific that it killed nearly three thousand people.
I will then list in the columns to follow which program uses these words, how often, and the time stamp in which they use the word. I will also be comparing the length and number of terrorism segments on each network for the given times. Because I am interested in discovering the difference in each side’s attempt to set the agenda and frame certain people as more likely to be terrorists I will be directly comparing the frequency of these words and the number of segments involving terrorism as a central theme. This will hopefully also shed light on how framing of people involved in said terrorist attack differs depending on the media
People assume that because someone is Islam or Muslim that they must be a terrorist, and they become weary of them to protect themselves. These situations demonstrate how permitting self-preservation to lead to hysteria causes destruction and hurt throughout the community. If not fixed, these situations will lead the destruction of the world. The theme of hysteria and self-preservation is evident throughout The Crucible and in real life.
Ironically, Rupert Murdoch, the head of Fox News’ parent company, has been quoted saying, "I challenge anybody to show me an example of bias in Fox News Channel." (Murdoch) Bias is clearly evident in much of the coverage from Fox News, however in this case the data is on their side, and they have presented a grand argument for the SCCC organization’s
It is almost sixteen years since that fear was imposed on us and the age of terror began in earnest. From the moment the Twin Towers fell, 9/11 was seen as a watershed, a historical turning point of grand and irreversible proportions. With the acrid smoke still swirling above ground zero, the mantras repeated constantly were that 9/11 had ?changed everything that nothing would ever be the same.? By now we see those mantras for what they were: natural, perhaps inevitable, exaggerations in the face of
The morning of Tuesday September 11, 2011 is one of the biggest tradgies of all time. On this specific day four airlines were hijacked by an Islamic group that goes by the name al-Qaeda. The attacks took the lives of 2,996 innocent people, injured nearly 6,000 people, and caused at least $10 billion in infracture and property damage. These attacks, also known as the 9/11 attacks, will forever be remebered as one of the most horrific days for so many people around this world.
I believe the majority of media outlets are liberal companies rather than conservative. Democrats are often known as liberals while republicans are known as conservatives. Media critics say that liberal bias exists in a wide variety of media networks,
If the media would report information as it happens with factual information, American would be left to interpret the data how they see fit. The Americans ' background and socialization will allow the information to be digested and interpreted in specific way. The media needs to be a platform to share information on a specific topic accurately, not a place to advance one 's
The media have produced their own definitions and examples of cyberterrorism even though to be classed as cyberterrorism it needs the four elements. To date, there have not been any cyberterrorist attacks if considering the definition provided by Kenney (2015). Cyberterrorism is a product of framing and interpretation, in which meaning is given to the world via language, images and other discursive practices: be they pictures of hand grenades, discussion of hypothetical ‘doomsday’ scenarios, or headlines about ‘malicious computer worms’. Jarvis et al. conducted an experiment and searched for particular keywords in media outlets in relation to cyberterrorism.
What happens in a terrorist attack affects many people in the world. The aftermath of an attack is what has the largest impact on people’s lives. However, terrorism does not have the same effect on everyone. The threat is not taken as seriously by some people. Some might think that it is an empty threat, but others might think it is a serious threat.