Was Johnson really exercising his right to free speech while burning the American flag? Some would argue he did, but others will say he didn’t. In most cases, majority would say he wasn’t practicing free speech which lead him to dishonor the U.S. flag. Flag burning will endanger the symbol of the role as representation of nationhood and national unity. We would be permitting a Sate to “prescribe what shall be orthodox” by saying that one may burn the flag to convey one’s attitude toward it and its referents only if one does not endanger the flag’s representation. Here I stand to say that for Johnson to burn the flag is very disturbing to our country as well to our peers. For him to do that wasn’t right and very rude. Many U.S. troops fight for our flag each and every day for our freedom and for us to live a natural free life instead of having many rules that would over power us. …show more content…
That is very dishonoring for him to burn the flag. Many people died for our country to keep the flag up and high to show how great our country is. By Johnson for burning the flag he could have cause many people in danger if it got out of control.
Burning the flag is a very dishonor to the United States and everything in between. The flag represents nationhood which gives us the freedom we need and want. Johnson for burning the flag leads to many causes. For him to do that, that’s means he doesn’t honor our nations freedom as well as the unity of our governments.
If Johnson wasn’t careful with what he did he wouldn’t have been in this big of a situation. He caused a lot of people to dislike him in many ways. The physical abuse of the flag carried out in a way likely to be offensive which lead him to be in a big
Johnson was loyal to the Union but did not agree completely with Lincoln’s view on the freedom of African Americans since he was from Tennessee. Andrew Johnson wanted to reconstruct the nation but did not think the freedom of African Americans had anything role in it. Johnson pardons confederate leaders and lets the southern states incorporate Black Codes into their state constitutions. Eric Foner explains that “what aroused the most opposition to Johnson’s Reconstruction policy were the Black Codes, laws passed by the new southern governments that attempted to regulate the lives of the former slaves”(565). The Black Codes kept African Americans freedom limited, which is not what the republicans wanted.
Johnson abuses his power as president. For example, he broke the Tenure of Office Act. He fired the secretary of war (Stanton), even though the act was made to limit AJ’s abilities to dismiss government officials. In addition, He pardoned people who would take an oath for allegiance, and he required leaders and wealthy men special presidential
The actions and words of Andrew Johnson were very contradictory. The cartoon states: "Treason is a crime and must be made odious, and traitors must be punished". He told the people of a reconstruction plan that was supposed to punish the confederate rebels. Johnson did the opposite by ordering many pardons The Northern Republicans in Congress were ostracized because he continually vetoed their attempts at reconstruction.
The court sentenced Johnson to one year in prison, and a fine of $2,000. Texas reversed Johnson’s conviction and the U.S. supreme court agreed to hear the case. If Johnson is not guilty, then he was right to his freedom of speech, because he burned the flag to get the laws attention Johnson tried to get the laws attention for what he needed to say, but they didn’t care for what he had to say. The only way to get the laws attention was doing something violent.
Johnson's speech argues that there is “no Southern problem. There is no Northern problem. There is only an American problem.” stating that we as a nation are bringing conflict towards one another simply due to the fact we are not the same color. He urges the people not based on their positions but rather the fact that they are all Americans and he wants the freedom that their past ancestors died for to be granted to every man and woman.
( Josh white). The flag was flown before, during, and after the Civil War. This does not mean it’s racist. The flag represents the heritage of the men and women who live in the southern states today. At Hudson High School, there was a group of students who raised the Rebel Flag on the school's flagpole during the night.
The Great Flag Debate of 1964, ultimately leading to the creation of Canada's national flag, was among the notable events of the 1960s. According to M.P. John Matheson, a member of the parliamentary committee that selected the flag, said the creation of the flag was the work of "many loving hands. " The controversy over the Canadian flag was a turning point in the history of the nation. At the time, Canadians were seeking to express their sense of national identity and to come up with a symbol that would stand in for them worldwide. Many people strongly argued for their favored design during the contentious and controversial debate over whivh flag desgin would win the chosen title.
Honestly, no I do not believe that the confederate battle flag is a symbol of racism or hatred. Personally I believe that anyone who thinks that the confederate flag is “racist” seriously needs a history lesson. In this essay, you will learn the history of the confederate flag, if it actually is a symbol of hatred, and what the United States plan to do to keep the country calm. The flag as we know it was born not as a symbol, but as a very practical banner.
In the article Veterans Day: Never Forget Their Duty by Senator John McCain “He was not making the flag because it made Mike Christian feel better. He was making that flag because he knew how important it was for us to be able to pledge our allegiance to our flag and country.” Being an american mean having the right to stand for what you believe and having the chance to say the Pledge of allegiance. He didn 't do this powerful action in result of pleasing another soul but he did this in the appeasement of his own actions. He knows how important it to pledge your loyalty toward your beliefs.
The law in Texas at the time banned flag burnings. He was convicted, and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court. We ruled that Johnson’s right to free speech had been violated. He was expressing symbolic speech. We ruled that even though an opinion is unpopular, doesn’t mean we have the right to restrict his freedom of
When a flag is presented in a rival that brings hate and discontent to America it should be removed from being displayed. I strongly am offended of the Confederate flag and my opinion is a lot of others are also offended. The constant reminder of the mistreatment and enslavement of the black race is still being suffered by black people today. The confederate flag brings grief to my heart as my ancestors were subjected to slavery.
First in the court case “Texas V. Johnson majority opinion” they stated that the people had the right to burn the flags due to the first amendment protecting them even if offended. For example they quoted “the way to preserve the flags special role is to not punish those who feel different it’s to persuade them that they are wrong”(lines 30-36). Furthermore “our decision is a reaffirmation of the principles of freedom and inclusiveness that the flag best reflects” (lines 27-29). So these quotes tell’s me that the courts tone is precise and that they are sure about their
Texas v. Johnson (1989) was a Supreme court case deciding whether or not flag burning is supported by “symbolic speech” protected by the first amendment. Gregory Lee Johnson is caught burning the American flag in Dallas, Texas in 1989 to protest Ronald Reagan`s policies. When Johnson had burned the flag during the protest the state of Texas arrested him for desecrating a venerated object. Although Johnson did not hurt or threaten to hurt anyone witnesses and spectators claimed to be seriously offended by seeing Johnson burn the flag. Most of the people in the courtroom were sided with Gregory Johnson supporting the fact that flag burning is considered as symbolic speech which is protected by the first amendment.
Assuming that the flag has a deep history of racial injustice that exceed far beyond the Civil War. Adding that his motive is patriotism, the flag has been managed as a symbol of racism and radical inequality. While the Confederate flag is a prevailing and problematical symbol, one that should entirely be dismantled. Taking down the flag is only the first step. What we must do is knock down racism.
Cornell University stated in an article, “Johnson was convicted of desertion of a venerated object in violation of Texas statute.” Johnson's actions were protected by the First Amendment so he was not sent to prison as stated in the United States Supreme Court case Texas v Johnson. His actions against the flag should have been more severe. Since Johnson’s actions were not threatening the branches of peace, there was no threat in the moment. “... and since the