In the current decade, students are often encouraged to comment and criticize one’s work. This process is looked as a way to make students think and apply what they had learnt in classrooms. I agree that it indeed provokes students’ thought process and is effective for them to gain better understanding on a certain topic. However, the expectations of criticizing someone’s work had just been raised to a whole new level as they’re actually encouraged to tear apart someone’s work and always having something to disagree with rather than criticizing constructively. During discussions, teachers are often interested to hear students arguing about their own standpoints rather than the actual takeaways from the paper.
If their paychecks were based off of their students success in their classes, their entire attitudes would change. They would take their job more seriously, and have some motivation to do their job the thorough way students need. “Many performance based pay systems include components which allow principals to terminate teachers who continuously fail to meet goals and objectives. Most teacher unions adamantly opposed performance based pay because of this element. Standard teacher contracts make it difficult to terminate employment, but a performance based pay contract makes it easier to remove a bad teacher.
For fact, they see them struggling. Though I believe the rare benefits to having inclusion in the class with change there are always challenges. Yet I believe the teachers will have the biggest change as they will learn how to manage a classroom with students that learn on different levels. “Part of the problem, I think, was that we were desegregating with- out any regard whatsoever for if that particular child belonged in that particular class” (Carpenter, 2008, p. 136). Now that is a major challenge, placing students in the wrong setting of classes, can be damaging to the students.
Lipman supports her claim by proving that statistically, disciplinary teachers are improving their students, students that don’t show grit are proven to seek failure, and the further teachers push their students, the more goals they’ll achieve. The author’s purpose is to express the ideals of strict teachers and to inform readers and students that teachers are hard on them for a reason. In order to indicate why students shouldn’t feel threatened or frightened by tough teachers, Lipman also shows that teachers are improving the learning environment. I strongly agree with the author’s claim on how tough teachers receive astounding results.
They do not know him as a whole person. Unless he becomes a special problem or has a special need. The high school age is a critical age; it is the age that we can change the wrong beliefs and strange thoughts. That is, can happen easily, if teachers get closer to their students, and share them some common activities. So the students can trust them which give both a wide range of active conversation.
(MP#2) Based on these points, many people affirm that those are the root causes which lead to educational achievement gap to students and they believe that solve all the causes together is the only way to close it.(ELAC) In my opinion, their claim is true but not accurate enough. They ignore the education part habitually because they think those root causes determine all the gaps that we suffer in our society. (ELAC)In fact, school system is the real root cause for all of those aspects.
To improve this, teachers and parents need to be mindful of how their students feel and need to not push them as much. You could see why people might think cheating is okay and vital to succeed, that doesn’t change the fact that it’s wrong and that you should talk to your teachers about how you
As they are students, mentioned in the previous paragraph, the workers at Great Clips are learning. So, they have a teacher in one ear, and a customer in another. This complicates things, because if a student is not understanding what a customer wants, they could interpret it to mean something different from what it actually is. So, where they might be doing the right thing for what they interpreted, they are actually doing something completely different than what the customer wants. If, on another hand, the teacher is nearby and the student has made a mistake in their interpretation, the teacher can defend the student and their position because of the job being done correctly, despite it not being what the customer wanted.
With conversations started, arguments argued, and controversy settling; the question still stands - Should students be paid for grades? It is now very clear that students should absolutely not be paid for grades; they will lose their love of learning and crush their creativity, and they will no longer feel self-motivation. Instead, teachers and parents should pour out more positive encouragement into today’s youth, which will encourage students to naturally do better in school. Also, students should take responsibility and pride in their school-work, as this is the (easiest) fix to this rapid-fire
Students alone can 't dispose of it all alone. All in all, what are a few techniques that the school can apply to dispense with this involvement in an understudy 's scholarly life? As per Skinner and Belmont (1993), understudies will stay persuaded in the classroom if their mental needs are met. Skinner and Belmont (1993) claim that understudies are fulfilled when the accompanying instructor conduct classifications are available: (1) structure, (2) self-governance, and (3) association. Structure alludes to how the class or environment is organized or controlled by the instructor.
While this may impact those kids that are focused on, the other kids are pushed aside on the back burner. The main reason behind this is that teachers are forced to have their students reach a certain level of success by standards set by the nation and their bosses. The number of tests that students have to take removes their ability to be creative and have an opinion. Bronwyn Williams expresses this when she says, “Standardized testing, to be standardized, must create questions that leave no room for interpretation…allow for no independent meaning making from students.” (154).
Often students do not know how to reach out, who to talk to or how to respond to a conflict. For this reason conflicts escalate, even though there are people who are able to train teachers and peers to handle such conflict in healthy way. The traditional school conflict resolution method, where adult decides the outcome for the student is becoming inefficient, so peer mediation provides the student with an opportunity to talk it out and resolve the conflict they. The students see the value n the program, they want to learn how to act when in conflict, beside just with anger and save valuable relationships. This peer mediation program would be effective by reducing violence and fights.
The Education of Immigrant Children Introduction Each year there are a numerous circumstances immigrant children face in order to get the proper education they need. Researchers have recognized the importance of children education and have found a three-pronged approach on how to handle this issue by removing barriers and provide funds to postsecondary schools that will lead children to be successful in the future, improve ECE participation rates among immigrant children, and having parental and family involvement to help their kids more to give them a better understanding in school. The Problem According to researchers, immigrant children in school are affected in several ways, some ways that later on in the future they might not