The “Era of Good Feelings,” from 1815-1825, was not an accurate label of the period after the War of 1812 because of various conflicts in economic nationalism , disagreements in politics, and the disunion of the citizens. In addition, several sectional issues emerged, mostly between the North and the South, regarding to the Tariff of 1816 and the conflict over slavery. Both nationalism and sectionalism had a great influence on whether the period from 1815-1825 was actually the “Era of Good Feelings.” Despite the fact that nationalism was emerging, it also caused many economic issues, thus, the “Era of Good Feelings” was not labeled accurately. After the War of 1812, many Americans had a feeling of patriotism in the 1820s when they were still celebrating the Fourth of July after many years, which shows how unified the citizens were. (Doc. C). However, another thing that “helped unify” the nation was the Tariff of 1816 that was …show more content…
Although in the Missouri Compromise, Missouri became a slave state and Maine became a free state, it was an example of disunity. All new states north of the Mason-Dixon Line would be free and new states southward would be slave states. As a result, there was also an unbalanced sectional population between the North and South. (Doc. E & F).
Ultimately, the “Era of Good Feelings” was labeled inaccurately after the War of 1812 because of various conflicts in economic nationalism, such as the Panic of 1819, disagreements in politics, and the disunion between northern states and southern states. Both nationalism and sectionalism had a great impact on deciding that the “Era of Good Feelings” was actually a period of bad feelings. Various disagreements in American politics were present between the president and the secretary of state, and during the presidential
They initially landmark in the history of the Republic of Jackson - Andrew 1820-40 was dominated by the president of the configuration is the - usually given, by Jackson era that has enjoyed decades of the founding period of the United States mentioned certain solidarity between States. What chronicler John O'Sullivan was called in 1839 "a great nation in the future." So it's established principles there is no other choice but to develop a complex attitude to a given current progress, the young country is 63 year old birth was true . It was a sign of how that conflict has taken the meaning according to who uses a two-sided language of the past and progress became a unique part of the political discourse. In fact, the mid-182Os, all but three
After the War of 1812, neo-colonialism started to decline within the United States and a whole new approach to foreign and domestic policy began with the ushering in of a new political culture. With the war over and European interests shifted from the Americas to Africa and Asia it left the United States with the ability to focus on internal affairs such as building the economy, reform, and expansion within the continent. (Nash, et al., 2007. , p. 270) The War of 1812 also had the effect of strengthening American nationalism and when Spain seemed to renew its interest in rebuilding it’s American empire with the help of other European powers the Monroe Doctrine was born.
Before the South‘s secession the Missouri compromise helped a lot in keeping balance. After Missouri requested to be a slave state to the Union, Congress knew that it would cause an uproar between states that were and weren‘t slave oriented. Due to this, the Congress created the Missouri compromise to keep balance between everybody. On May 3, 1920 the compromise was put in place which meant that it set Maine as a free state and Missouri as a slave state still creating perfect balance. As the Missouri compromise was in place it was condemned by plenty of Southerners but even with that it lasted and kept peace with everyone as well as help keep the Union together for more than thirty years.
Both the newly formed domestic and foreign policies that America established after their claim for independence, undermined the nation’s strength and foundation and brought negative outcomes that would shape american politics from the 1790’s to the 1840’s. In the time ranging from the 1790’s to the 1840’s many events came that would bring Jeffersonians and Hamiltonians further against one another, splitting the body of the nation of America and eventually bringing opposing sides to each political decision. One issue came to cause much tension between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, and this was the proposed Bank of the United States which would be used by the federal government for money deposits. This new system
The United States Civil War is possible one of the most meaningful, bloodstained and controversial war fought in American history. Northern Americans against Southern Americans fought against one another for a variety of motives. These motives aroused from a wide range of ideologies that stirred around the states. In James M. McPherson’s What they fought for: 1861-1865, he analyzes the Union and Confederate soldier’s morale and ideological components through the letters they wrote to love ones while at war. While, John WhiteClay Chambers and G. Kurt Piehler depict Civil War soldiers through their letters detailing the agonizing battles of war in Major Problems in American Military History.
Throughout the war, Slavery was the main key that brought more problems to intensify the start of the war between the north and the south. To demonstrate in the textbook, “The Americans”, the author states that, “Most white southerners also feared that an end to their entire way of life was at hand. Many were desperate for
Economic Developments During the early 1800s, economic developments helped the America grow into a prosperous country. As nationalism was highly prominent during this era, many policies were experimented to try to help America grow with more power. Often times, since America’s population was so diverse, these policies often stemmed differing opinions from different citizens. However, such policies that were generally successful, such as the American System, would amalgamate many parts of the country, as well as producing a self-sustaining and unified nation.
After Andrew Jackson became president it seemed that America lost their nationalism. The era of good feelings came after the war of 1812. The government has a greater presence in the economy. The second U.S. bank was established. The government passed a protective tariff.
To give the period after the War of 1812 the name of “Era of Good Feelings” would be somewhat-inaccurate. America’s victory in the war surely did unite the states and brought upon some “good feelings” such as unity and growth as a thriving nation, but these good feelings were not all that came out of the war. The states were heavily separated even after the war with conflicts amongst each other and within themselves. Examples of America’s sectionalism come from their social, political, and economic differences, all in which pertain to distrust between the northern and southern parts of the country. Despite all of this, however, there is no denying that there was a sense of pride and togetherness during this time period.
The Era of Good Feelings, beginning in 1816 with the election of James Monroe as president, directly followed the War of 1812, was a time of nationalism, hope and and confidence in the United States. However, in the shadow of this national pride, different areas of the country began to shift apart in different ways, opening the door to domestic tension. The Era of Good Feeling was both a time of economic growth and political change for the country. This was caused by a surge in nationalistic feelings throughout the United States, as well as growing sectional tensions. The War of 1812 made the American people feel as though they should be aggressive in foreign affairs,which led to the introduction of a protective tariff and the Monroe Doctrine.
Slavery came to a complete end, the South lost much of its power, and President Abraham Lincoln died for his belief in the iconic words “All men were created equal.” Understanding the many effects of the end of the American Civil War can lead to a better understanding of the nation as a whole, and some of the current problems it
The aftermath of the Civil War caused drastic transformations among the American people between the years 1860 and 1880. Of these changes rose the issues of political and social relations within the nation. The issues of political and social relationships arose among several different groups of people, causing these relationships to drastically change. Through the transformations of public liberty, right of succession, and slavery, the Civil War and it's inevitable aftermath was able to alter the political and social relationships that had been instilled in the fabric of America before the times of 1860.
This promising principle of egalitarianism intoxicated every mind irrespective of social differences. Nationalism stood as the harbinger of a new age. It commanded popular support
America had yet to face the heartbreak and divisive struggles of its citizens which became more and more prevalent in the proceeding decade. America created a national identity as a strong negotiator and world power, but at home it did not have a handle on the rebelliousness signified in this age. Racial tensions became strong although the American citizens had fought the Nazis over religious discrimination. However, with this
The Civil War allowed the United States to make the changes necessary to unify the country. In addition, it began one of the most transitional periods in the United States’ history. This period, the Reconstruction, brought about many political, social, and economic changes, which were both beneficial and disagreeable. The 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, the Panic of 1873, and the formation of the Ku Klux Klan are just a few examples of heavily impacting events for the United States. During the Reconstruction period there were numerous political transformations in the country.