The government shouldn’t have to baby their people, they can think for themselves. Removing the ability for them to have a choice strips people of their freedom, and America is built on the ideal of freedom. Adding on, the soda ban might not even have any health benefits. Referring back to Gross’ article, a nutritionist is quoted as saying, “It is not reasonable to blame or cite one product… [the proposal] produces a false sense of accomplishment in the fight against obesity.” Even health experts disagree with the ban. This mandate supposedly improves people’s well-being, but it fails at accomplishing that goal.
Furthermore, Herbert says he is worried about the usage or the similar slogans would diminish its effectiveness. To counter that, Seaver states that, “Those who read our ad may well tend to go out and buy a Coke rather than our book…” He then continues to say they are fine with giving Coca-Cola this benefit. This once again mocks Herbert’s arguments because if Coca-Cola’s slogan is that well known, the book company would be advertising for Coca-Cola. This also indicates that people are unlikely to read a Coke ad and go out to buy a book so Herbert shouldn’t be worried about the slogan being less effective. The tone Seaver uses makes fun of Herbert’s letter and renders his arguments feeble, which increases the effectiveness of the Grove Press
So, all of the apologies were unneeded. Yes, I understand that we should accept and let him take care of business. But, he isn’t make very smart choices. Rick Snyder is governor so he is suppose to govern us meaning “take care of” so if you wanted to be a governor and accepted not to help people in a crisis such as The Flint Water Crisis then most definitely you should step down. The last reason why people don’t understand why Rick Snyder should step down is because Rick Snyder knew about the water being contaminated.
The government shouldn’t be trying to control what we eat, but they should instead be giving us a healthier, affordable alternative. It’s not okay that we lack healthier alternatives, nor is it okay that we lack information about what we’re consuming, but it is definitely not okay us to look at everything possible to blame without even looking at
In this strong statement, it’s clear that being smart is seen as unacceptable and disregarded. It being seen as an insult to you if you are intelligent makes you not be intelligent, and fit into the normal, wanted lifestyle that authorities enforced. Beatty also exclaimed to Montag that “Don’t give them any slippery stuff like philosophy or sociology” (Bradbury 58) This gives you a perspective of Philosophy. Making it seem like it’s something dangerous and undesirable. Beatty giving philosophy and sociology a bad connotation, so that Montag is persuaded not to rebel, and society is not in the wrong.
The final reason why gun control is unright is because banning them would be an attack on the second amendment. It seems that as time goes by, the constitution becomes less and less important. Let’s take a look at prohibition. It didn’t work. All it did was create more crime and illegal buying of alcohol (The Party of Principal).
Unfortunately, the border wall did not help as much like Americans thought it would. Like any other new tryout, it has its benefits and its disadvantages. The border wall was built to prevent drug trafficking, but instead it has made no change in this situation. One example of their disadvantages is that people still tend to cross drugs into the United States without being caught, and this puts people’s lives at risk. When something involves drugs, it involves money, and this makes people want power over everything.
The article states, “Gun control deters violent crime as well as the death penalty” (Hunter). The author uses logos here to point out that gun control is an ineffective as the death penalty when it comes to preventing violence. This supports his argument against strict gun control because, according to Hunter, many Liberals claim to oppose the death penalty because it does little to prevent future crime, yet Liberals are for strict gun control. However, strict gun control isn’t going to prevent criminals from committing crimes, because criminals do not follow the law
Rearing Petrochek patent, although Seltek would like to sell it along with the plant as a full offering package, it was not valuable for us at all. Petrochek was just used to solve water pollution problem and was not related to our business. Besides, our top management team also did not want to buy Petrochek patent. Therefore, we did not intend to buy it unless they offered a appealing price, for example, half of market price. Then we might buy it and sell at the market price afterwards to obtain an additional
This is considered a divine law which shouldn’t be changed for the good of a few people, much like how a state law can’t contradict a federal law. For physicians and the general public that disagree with assisted suicide feel that assisted suicide can give society the approval to kill. “Legislation that allows people to end their lives automatically creates incentives to seek death as a cost-saving option. The elderly and infirm are seen as burdens and can easily be disposed of. Suicide becomes the easy way out.” (Ben Broussard) Most of the time physicians are against the idea of physician assisted suicide because it goes against their job description and personal beliefs.