ipl-logo

Ethical Differences Between Slaughtering And Experimentation With Animals

1037 Words5 Pages

Ethics are the moral principles and norms on which human activities are judged. Is it right to use animals in experimentation? What makes the experimentation with animals right or wrong? What are the differences between slaughtering and experimenting with animals? How ethical and moral can experimenting with animals be? I am going to discuss the views of these issues concerning the ethics that goes along with experimenting with animals in this passage.
Firstly, animals may be subject to experimentation or be modified into conditions useful for gaining knowledge about human diseases or for testing human potential treatments. For example, it was discovered long ago that rats have similar genetic build-up and the identical systems as human being, so rats have been used along for experimentation. According to the animal research: the ethics of animal experimentation that was published in July the sixtieth 2010,some people argue that experimentation with animals should end because it is wrong to treat animals merely as tools for further knowledge while others ague that animal are better target as opposed to using human beings.
However, I think there is nothing wrong with experimenting with animals because; most of the animals are killed for meat, leather and for various ceremonies in some traditions. Some animals are also killed due to lack of …show more content…

So this simply means that the animals can feel pain and experience pleasure, therefore they should have the same status as human and deserve equal treatment as human. This drives home the point that human beings should not have the right to harm, kill, or treat animals merely as a means to achieve their own goal or to further their knowledge. So according to these, anything that has something to do with the suffering of the animals that is caused by men should be abolished and these include experimentation with

Show More
Related

Ap Psychology Chapter 2 Summary

1304 Words | 6 Pages

Critics have claimed that the results from an animal cannot generalize over to people, and while this can be true, assumptions about human behavior based on animal research takes into consideration data from descriptive as well as experimental studies with people. The second objection to animal research is that it has no practical value as the research only provides facts that are only useful to a theoretician. While this might sometimes be the case the findings from animal research have been able to be put to good use in topics such as child rearing, sports, and education. Lastly, many critics are quick to say that animal research is unethical as people have no more right to experiment on animals as animals have to experiment on people. While there are ethical concerns that should be taken seriously these concerns beg the question of if it is unethical to use animals in research what about eating them, what about forcing them to be our pets or what about using animals on

Read More

A Question Of Ethics 'And Animal Research Saves Lives'

987 Words | 4 Pages

“A Question of Ethics” by Jane Goodall and “Animal Research Saves Lives” by Heloisa Sabin presents two sides of the same coin in regards to Animal testing. Thereby, questioning the validity or necessity of animal research and testing today. In “A Question of Ethics” by Goodall she presents a scenery of the living conditions of the animals which are often isolated; posing the ultimate questions of, whether animal research is essential to medical research? Or How many tests are performed only to conform to laws and not out of scientific merit? The Suggestion was made that scientists should explore alternative options, such as testing on cell and tissue cultures.

Read More

Persuasive Speech Animal Testing

1084 Words | 5 Pages

Since the value of animal life as a living being should be recognized and to a certain extent equated to the value of human life, the animal experiments raise a range of ethical questions (Armstrong & Botzler,

Read More

Summary Of Animal Liberation By Peter Singer

1451 Words | 6 Pages

Currently, human’s life is accorded a higher value than animal’s life (Singer, 1973) . The animal has been used in genetic manipulation experiments, but it is illegal to use human subjects in similar research activities. Human believes they have authority over animals hence it is difficult to prevent them from using animals for research especially when the results are not

Read More

Animal Testing In Cosmetic Products

971 Words | 4 Pages

In conclusion, I disagree with use animals for experiments because testing animals may be only a little life which was forgotten. Some species were classified as animals disgusting. But what of the animals was back with an enormous value which allows humans to develop various medical science and help humans survived a disease. It would not be wrong to say that the success of these is what is derived from experimental animals. So, it is time we should look at the lives of animals as creatures that must bear the pain instead of

Read More

Eat Animals The Nice Way Analysis

751 Words | 4 Pages

The both sides of this topic are very controversial because there are many opinions about this and in this essay i will explain the both sides and in between of the argument. Between the arguments of animals being experimented on and animals being people who are our pets; there is a major controversial conflict about it. In the article, “Eating Animals the Nice Way.” by Jeff McMahan, he states, “Many people are opposed to factory farming because of the terrible suffering it inflicts on animals, yet see no

Read More

Why Animal Experimentation Is Unethical

1066 Words | 5 Pages

Animal experimentation is unacceptable because it is unethical. The article “Animal Experimentation” it states, “many people object to the use of animals in scientific studies because the animals are denied their freedom and often suffer serious injury and discomfort.” People disagree with animal experimentation because the animals do not have the freedom to choose. Animals cannot speak for themselves to tell whether or not they want to get tested on, because of this then the animals that are tested on suffer a lot of discomfort and injuries. Another reason why animal experimentation is unethical because it is unreliable.

Read More

Physician Assisted Suicide And Euthana's Ethical Dilemma

509 Words | 3 Pages

If experiments done on animals do not cause them happiness, under Utilitarian view, they would be considered immoral. Furthermore, if humans are going to eat non-human animals, it can only be right if the non-human animals are treated right, up until they are

Read More

The Argument Against Animal Experiment

482 Words | 2 Pages

The researchers do not consider the animal’s capacity for suffering, and they already knew the experiment will cause the animals suffer. After the experiment, the animal suffers pain and the researchers will destroy the animals because they are only the sample in the research. The animal has a very little chance to live. The experiment is exploiting the right of an animal to live. The destroy of the animal sample is treat the animal as a tool, the animals become the substitutes to test for the human being interested, and the test is fatal.

Read More

Persuasive Essay Why Animal Testing Is Wrong

1111 Words | 5 Pages

Although the experimentation of animals has furthered medical knowledge, it should not be allowed because it is brutal and animals are unable to give their approval. In order to do a study on humans it must be authorized by them, where animals are unable to give consent, which strikes questions in the world of science on whether this is morally acceptable. Although animal experimentation can result in saving the lives of millions, many find it to be cruel and unjust. Seeing as animals are unable to speak for themselves, they are still able to express their emotions through their behavior.

Read More

Why Animal Testing Should Not Be Banned

796 Words | 4 Pages

Every year, millions of animals were suffering or killed due to scientific research. Some animal rights groups suggest that we should ban animal experiments because use animals for experimentation is cruel and animals should have the same right of living as human beings. A report from U.S. Department of Agriculture shows that more than 100 million animals are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical experimentation, and chemical, drug, food, and cosmetics testing. There are some other people believe that the death of animals will help and save millions of human lives. Personally I believe that the experimentation on animals for scientific and medical should not be stopped.

Read More

Animal Testing Is Bad

364 Words | 2 Pages

Some say that animal experimentation is good for us but is it good for the animals? Animal experimentation is cruel to the animals but not many people can see that because all they are thinking about is themselves. People use animals to test human products on them to see if they would be good for us but how do the animals feel when we hurt them like that? Animals are our companions and they were always meant to be our companions but lately the most they have been used for is animal testing.

Read More

Commercial Testing Vs Animal Testing

281 Words | 2 Pages

Should animals be used for scientific or commercial testing? This topic is compelling to me because I'm a fan of animals, even though i've never owned a pet. I believe it is wrong to use animals

Read More

Animal Testing Utilitarianism

2744 Words | 11 Pages

Introduction Animals testing have significantly contributed to the advancement of scientific knowledge in general and to biomedical progress specifically. Many example showing that laboratory animals in medical development and other aspects have significantly influenced human health and reduced suffering, for example improved diagnosis of infectious disease (Hau, Jann, Schapiro & Steven, 2002). But since 1960s and 1970s, animals testing protests has gained prominence and strength, people start to argue is it moral to continue “cruel” animal testing. Animal Testing is a Moral Act In the rest of this article, I shall apply different concept under utilitarianism try to discuss whether animal testing are moral acts. It is important to notice that (1) in this article, applying the general idea of utilitarianism which is “the greatest happiness of greatest number” and (2) the animals testing under the rules and regulations.

Read More

Does Animal Testing Benefit Humanity?

604 Words | 3 Pages

Most people believe that animal testing is okay, but it is not. It is true that animal testing has led us to incredible medical breakthroughs, such as the discovery of Anesthetics, blood transfusion, insulin, etc; however, there are alternate methods to achieve the same results. There are many reasons on why animal testing does not benefit humanity. Animals die for no good reason, animal drugs produced by humans to aid humans do not work, animal experiments are expensive, and can delay vaccines. Animal testing provides people nothing and that researcher should ultimately stop experimenting on animals.

Read More

More about Ethical Differences Between Slaughtering And Experimentation With Animals

Related Topics

Open Document