Michael Almereyda Hamlet Comparison Essay

580 Words3 Pages

In this comparison I will be addressing the similarities and the differences of two film adaptations of Hamlet. A version is the one by Michael Almereyda which was released in the early 2000 while the other is by Kenneth Branagh which was released in an earlier date of 1996. Both of these were similar to one another to an extent as they were based on the true original text of the play Hamlet but at the same time presented in two different ways. As the plot stayed the same within the two films there were other factors that made it different to each other. Like the settings and like the environment of the play. As well as the way the characters presented their actions and emotions. But other than those it was quite similar to one another and created the same atmosphere of what Hamlet was truly about. First of, there was a big discrepancy between the actors that were in the movies. As one was with older actors while the other was more younger. In addition, there was fashion that they had in their clothing like one was modern and the other was old. This changes the way the audience views the characters age and even the way that they dress. Furthermore, in the version of Michael Almereyda, the character's voice was louder and more powerful creating stronger emotions while in the …show more content…

Technically speaking, the one in the castle is probably the most appropriate environment for Hamlet since the original text shows that the play was in the medieval but the other one works too. This is significant because it shows the impact of the setting towards the plot of the story and how the play is seen by the audience. As one was in the crowded area of the state of New York while the other is more in the tiny castle with very few people around. You can see that there’s a difference between the setting of the two films and it has different effects to the plot of the

Open Document