In this comparison I will be addressing the similarities and the differences of two film adaptations of Hamlet. A version is the one by Michael Almereyda which was released in the early 2000 while the other is by Kenneth Branagh which was released in an earlier date of 1996. Both of these were similar to one another to an extent as they were based on the true original text of the play Hamlet but at the same time presented in two different ways. As the plot stayed the same within the two films there were other factors that made it different to each other. Like the settings and like the environment of the play. As well as the way the characters presented their actions and emotions. But other than those it was quite similar to one another and created the same atmosphere of what Hamlet was truly about. First of, there was a big discrepancy between the actors that were in the movies. As one was with older actors while the other was more younger. In addition, there was fashion that they had in their clothing like one was modern and the other was old. This changes the way the audience views the characters age and even the way that they dress. Furthermore, in the version of Michael Almereyda, the character's voice was louder and more powerful creating stronger emotions while in the …show more content…
Technically speaking, the one in the castle is probably the most appropriate environment for Hamlet since the original text shows that the play was in the medieval but the other one works too. This is significant because it shows the impact of the setting towards the plot of the story and how the play is seen by the audience. As one was in the crowded area of the state of New York while the other is more in the tiny castle with very few people around. You can see that there’s a difference between the setting of the two films and it has different effects to the plot of the
My version of Hamlet would combine elements from Branagh and Cumberbatch’s interpretations with some original ideas. The setting would be similar to Branagh’s version, and it would consist mainly of tracking shots. Hamlet would walk through a maze in his garden where Polonius is also wandering. The camera zooms out and shows and aerial view of the maze. It zooms back in on Polonius as he reaches Hamlet and the scene unfolds.
The author explores how character archetypes are used in both stories. The author discusses the differences between the two works. He notes that while both stories use archetypal characters, the archetypes in The Lion King are more simplified than those in Hamlet. This is because the former uses a more straightforward narrative structure. For example, the protagonist in The Lion King, Simba, is characterized as a young, naive lion cub who must learn to take responsibility for his actions and rise to the challenge of ruling his kingdom.
Hamlet is one of the most remarkable tragedy plays in the world, thus there are many reproductions to create same sensation. Films of Hamlet are the most famous versions of these and there are so several films created. These include Branagh’s version released in 1996 and Tennant’s version released in 2009. Branagh 's film is four hours long movie trying to create the exact version of story Hamlet on the screen and Tennant’s is three hours long television film, famous because it is a modernized version of Hamlet. Although Branagh’s and Tennant’s versions films have vast differences, they are both be able to convey the play’s theme of madness in their films.
Hamlet is a young loyal man while the queen is nothing close to being loyal. Hamlet is loyal to his father and want revenges for his death by killing Claudius while Queen Gertrude is disloyal to Old Hamlet by marrying his
Although Zeffirelli’s abridgment may prevent a few yawns out of his audience, his shortened version comes at a definite price; various omissions in the film take away from Shakespeare’s masterwork, leaving viewers with a watered down experience. Yet, this change definitively makes both the film and plot more engaging. In contrast, the much longer version by Branagh builds stronger character development and enables Branagh to follow closer to the text of Shakespeare. Perhaps one of the largest differences between these films is also the most passive; the setting. Branagh’s adaptation is set sometime in the 19th century and portrays a more modern Hamlet, which is best illustrated by the gorgeous palace of Elsinore; mirrored doors, decorative white trim, elaborate staircase and bright lighting all share dramatic contrast to the palace in Zeffirelli’s film.
As with all written works that are turned into movies, Hamlet the movie was different from Hamlet the play. One difference that I noted was the time setting of the story. The play is set in the late middle ages while the movie representation is set in the modern era. Another difference that I noted was that Hamlet in the movie, as well as Ophelia in the movie, seemed a lot crazier than I had pictured when reading the play. Hamlet was represented as psychotic in the movie, while in the play I pictured a man who was crazy over the death of his father, the marriage of his mother, and his love for Ophelia, but not to the point of an absolute psychotic man.
Branagh’s version was true to the plot and was based in a modern period of time, while Zeffirelli 's skewed away from the original text and set his film in the medieval times. However, while those dislike the medieval setting of Zeffirelli 's film, the way the director has his character roam throughout the kingdom, allows his viewers to observe the society during the period in which the play was set. Unlike in Branagh’s film, where characters were usually restricted to certain rooms in the castle. When comparing the overall quality of the two films, one can observe the amount of effort Branagh placed upon ensuring his portrayal of Hamlet was true to the script. Nevertheless, the greatest differentiation between the two films was how they portrayed the characters.
From personalities, to actions, a lot of things about the characters are different. For instance, the script of the play that was read in class did not include the part when the girls were dancing with Tituba in the forest. That scene is not entirely necessary, but it would have opened more people’s eyes instead of them having to use context clues to figure out what happened. On the contrary, others would argue that the beginning part with the girls and Tituba was not necessary to start the plot of the story. Another instance would be that during the movie, the character seem to be more aggressive and emotional.
The moral background within the story of Hamlet and The Lion KIng are similar consisting that their plots also correspond. In every situation whether it be in Hamlet or The Lion KIng all the actors or cast members displayed an act of portraying a personality not seen at first glance. Which can be similar corresponding to “real” life that most people aren't who they appear to be. For example The King’s brother or Simba’s uncle took on this role of being responsible, caring, and a very big role model in the kingdom but in turn his real role in society was to play this manipulative, and inconsiderate being. The common people; however, followed the role he displayed not the role that made him who he was.
As presented throughout the play, Hamlet and Horatio have both similarities and differences that better help the reader examine character foils and their significance in the
Hamlet and Lion King Hamlet and the movie Lion King have many similarities. They are composed of the same storyline and have many of the same symbolisms. They both are about a royal family and the betrayal of the King 's death by their brother. It also holds in common the son and how he seeks revenge upon his father’s death. In comparing Hamlet and Lion King there are many differences too.
In the ever changing world of literature, one play stands the test and that is William Shakespeare's Hamlet. This dramatic, thrilling, tragic play tells the story of a “young prince of Denmark, Hamlet, who is seeking vengeance for his father’s murder.” () The storyline itself is able to grasp the reader, and take them alongside Hamlet as he slowly takes down his enemies and uncovers the secrets, betrayal, and scheming nature of his family. Aside from the storyline, what makes this play great is the monologues, as well as dialogues between characters. Shakespeare incorporates an array of vivid imagery, metaphors, and exquisite vocabulary to make known the passion and heart behind every single character.
Hamlet and the lion king are a lot alike in many ways. It seems that both movie/play could be considered tragedies. But, in some or in many ways they are very different. Disney seems to use a lot of plots from plays and poems for their movies. Hamlet happens to be one of them.
The play Hamlet, written by William Shakespeare left a lot to the reader’s imagination. While it is important for the reader to form their own interpretations, illustrations such as those painted by Richard Dadd and Henry Fuseli give the reader a concreate image of specific scenes from the play. These depictions share similar characteristic, and their own twists that make them unique. Both paintings are effective in conveying the mood and themes of the piece, and provide imagery that enhances the reader’s experience.
A tragic hero is a multifaceted, admirable character with a tragic flaw that turns his life from glory into suffering. Hamlet is an example. ‘Born’ personality, shifting mentality, and inevitable fate leads to its tragedy which eventually triggers audience’s pity. Unlike other tragedies where tragic heros discover the truths by their own actions at the end of the story, realizing that the reversal was brought by their own actions. Hamlet begins differently by knowing the truth from things happening to him.